Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

182,934 users have contributed to 42,264 threads and 254,951 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 7 new post(s) and 50 new user(s).

  • last edited
    last edited

    @clarkcontrol said:

    The second measurement is peak readings derived from the entire movement?

    Clark

    Yes, the max. readout of the whole I. Allegro movement


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    I would like to hear the mock-up(s) to determine if the dynamics and balances between instruments are realistic to my ears. Do you have an mp3 that you could post?
    Another job for Felix. I provide the MIDI data, or the Logic project. I certainly not mixing the mock-up, I simply have no time for that. .

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Angelo Clematide said:

    Felix and Rob

     

    And now, please tell us what you do with this data, respectively how you apply it in a useful manner.

     

    Angelo

     

     

    Hey Angelo, thanks a lot! Even though most won´t believe me, I think this could help a lot. What I would do with that, is to compare the levels of my instruments with your levels. If you have an mp3 of the mix, the levels are adressed to, I could quite easy see, how I have to set my faders to gain a similar result with no instrument playing in a wrong velocity level.

  • Felix and others, "Intensities of Orchestral Instrument Scales Played at Prescribed Dynamic Markings" is a 1964 MIT paper, principal author William Strawn, available from AES online. I've uploaded a couple snippets to: http://homepage.mac.com/johnnymarks Useful data and interesting observations in the paper. Worth the $20 download. Cheers.

  • last edited
    last edited

    Orchestration and Dynamics

    There is an important difference between absolute and relative dynamics. Every instrument has some relative dynamic control in every register. However, some instruments in particular registers simply cannot achieve certain absolute dynamics: A group of brass playing in their high registers will never be very soft; a low flute can never be extremely loud. The best rule for a beginner is: Orchestrate your dynamics instead of just writing them as textual indications. Especially at dynamic extremes, ensure that the instruments and the registers chosen are conducive to the dynamic level required.

    As a rough guide, here is a table of what the various families can achieve in absolute dynamics.

    ppp

    pp

    p

    mf

    f

    ff

    fff

    woodwind

    (x)*

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    brass

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    percussion

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    strings

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    x

    * the clarinet can play whisper soft, provided it is not written too high.

    What is important in this chart is how to achieve dynamic extremes. Strings and certain percussion, (tam-tam, cymbals, and the lower drums) can start practically inaudibly. For sheer power, nothing has the force and impact of (high) brass plus percussion.

    The notation of dynamics is often problematic for beginners. A good approach is to act as though there are only four dynamic levels: pp, mf, f, and ff. First, orchestrate the passage so that the absolute dynamic level desired easily results from the choice of instruments and registers. Second, think of dynamics as character indications. Choose which dynamic of the above four best suits the passage. Third, avoid the middle dynamics (mp, mf) as starting points: these are what players do when there are no dynamics notated at all. Finally, beginners should avoid writing different dynamics for different instruments: This requires a great deal of experience, since players normally do not see each others dynamic indications, and normally tend to aim for rough balance, unless the conductor specifies otherwise.

    Reference:

    http://www.musique.umontreal.ca/personnel/Belkin/bk.o/o3.html


  •     Do you write your music that is to be performed with absolute dynamics? I understand writing absolute dynamics for something that will be realized only on a computer, but it seems that if a flute player sees a marking of mf in the low regester, he/she will hold in reserve a good deal for louder dynamics. If I played the Rachmaninoff 3 piano concerto (nothing more than a dream, for now), and at the end where the piano is playing only in the upper regester it said mf (I am not sure what the actual score says. I am just using a 'what-if'), I would assume that this part should not be played to the full potential of the piano. Obviously, this part is the huge climax of a huge piece, and should be played with all the power that has been built up through the rest of the piece. But, in using absolute dynamics to notate this piece, Rachmaninoff would have had to put something like a mf there, as the piano just cannot play an orchestral ff in that regester as loud as the brass that comes in.

        So my qestion is, are absolute dynamics a good option for music to be performed by an orchestra?

         Colin Thomson


  • last edited
    last edited

    @ColinThomson said:

    So my qestion is, are absolute dynamics a good option for music to be performed by an orchestra?

     

     

     Colin Thomson

    Colin, don't think that's practical (or practiced). A flute's forte equals a trombone's pianissimo (in absolute values). You'd need a new dynamic marking system/convention to accommodate absolute values in the score. Decibels! "Uhh...violas: the fourth bar, could you bring that down just a little more, maybe -37 instead of -30 as he's marked here?..." ;)

  • last edited
    last edited

    @ColinThomson said:

    So my qestion is, are absolute dynamics a good option for music to be performed by an orchestra?

     

     

     Colin Thomson

    Colin, don't think that's practical (or practiced). A flute's forte equals a trombone's pianissimo (in absolute values). You'd need a new dynamic marking system/convention to accommodate absolute values in the score. Decibels! "Uhh...violas: the fourth bar, could you bring that down just a little more, maybe -37 instead of -30 as he's marked here?..." ;) (Sorry, can't seem to bring up the edit page for this post above...). Colin: Also meant to to direct you again to the paper I've referenced a post or two up the page (Strawn, Intensities of Orchestral...). I believe this is exactly the information you expressed a desire for in an earlier post (and which I looked high and low last year to find!)

  • Angelo makes a good point.  Good arranging skills will let the ensemble balance naturally.

    And a piccolo can bury an orchestra.

    Clark


  • So I see clarkcontrol...

    You've gone over to the Dark Side.


  • LUUUKE....I AM YOUR FAAAAHHHTHER...

    Angelo and I have been seeing each other for weeks now. Maybe its time that you and I broke up. Sorry I cheated on you, but I wanted to see if this new thing took before cutting you off.[6]

    Actually, look back a page and you'll see that I've managed to thwart the recruitment of two new stormtroopers. They have now gone underground and are being trained in the ways of the pagan alliance.

    Liberty and Freedom for all!

    Clark


  • You are subtle, aren't you, Clarkcontrol? I had no idea that volume automation was the way of the pagan alliance.

    Colin Thomson 


  • SSHHHH!!

    The Empire is listening!

    If they know that automating volume levels erodes the dark forces of a dynamic range template, they will find some sneaky way of adopting our weaponry into their paradigm, thus annexing our well-intentioned cure-all into their subversive attack on musical dignity everywhere!

    Preserve the faith in your ears and your musical instincts!

    Oh, yeah, and Liberty and Freedom for all!

    Clark


  • last edited
    last edited

    @William said:

    So I see clarkcontrol...

    You've gone over to the Dark Side.

    We would be honoured if you would join us!

    We find your lack of faith disturbing. Search your feelings

    or you have failed me for the last time, Admiral. You will

    join us or die, master


  • last edited
    last edited

    @ColinThomson said:

    You are subtle, aren't you, Clarkcontrol? I had no idea that volume automation was the way of the pagan alliance.

    Colin Thomson 

    To young luke warm Skywalker, 


  • last edited
    last edited

    @clarkcontrol said:

    LUUUKE....I AM YOUR FAAAAHHHTHER...

    Angelo and I have been seeing each other for weeks now. Maybe its time that you and I broke up. Sorry I cheated on you, but I wanted to see if this new thing took before cutting you off.

    Actually, look back a page and you'll see that I've managed to thwart the recruitment of two new stormtroopers. They have now gone underground and are being trained in the ways of the pagan alliance.

    Liberty and Freedom for all!

    Clark

    First, let us enjoy some real music!



    Second, Viva dark matter! Viva El Presidente! Viva musica!

    Viva Bobby Joe, Viva!


  • last edited
    last edited

    @JohnnyMarks said:

    Felix and others, "Intensities of Orchestral Instrument Scales Played at Prescribed Dynamic Markings" is a 1964 MIT paper, principal author William Strawn, available from AES online. I've uploaded a couple snippets to: http://homepage.mac.com/johnnymarks Useful data and interesting observations in the paper. Worth the $20 download. Cheers.
     

    Nice find, thanks.


  • Before I make myself the stress to explain any further digital audio production specifications, I post a few links for my distinguished friends here.

    Below some links to papers which deal with the subject of mastering, signal overload, transcoding etc.:

    [B]Overload in Signal Conversion[/B]

    A paper about the headroom needed in processing, routing and reproduction of digital signals to prevent distortion and listening fatigue from happening. It includes a discussion of AD, DA, sample rate conversion and data reduction systems.

    by Soren Nielsen & Thomas Lund

    [url]http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/nielsen_lund_2003_overload.pdf[/url]

    [B]Mastering and Formats - Stop Counting Samples[/B]

    Report from the frontline of the CD Loudness war, 2006: It's not over yet. Read about distortion developing in CD players, data reduction systems etc. The Appendix suggests improved procedures to follow in production and mastering.

    by Thomas Lund

    [url]http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/lund_2006_stop_counting_samples_aes121.pdf[/url]

    [B]0 dBFS+ Levels in Digital Mastering[/B]

    This paper examines the sonic consequences when 0dBFS+ signals are reproduced in typical consumer equipment. The performance of a variety of domestic CD players exposed to such signals are presented and evaluated.

    by Soren Nielsen & Thomas Lund

    [url]http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/nielsen_lund_2000_0dbfs_le.pdf[/url]

    [B]Level Control in Digital Mastering[/B]

    Music mastering is becoming a battle for maximum level rather than a quest for audio quality, because counting consecutive samples at OdBFS is not an adequate restriction of level.

    by Soren Nielsen & Thomas Lund

    [url]http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/nielsen_lund_1999_level_co.pdf[/url]

    [B]The Secret of the Mastering Engineer[/B]

    Mastering is an art and a science. In this acclaimed booklet, Bob Katz shares good advice about monitoring, metering and processing. About listening to the music and supporting it as the road to Nirvana - from one of the true yogis of our industry.

    by Bob Katz

    [url]http://www.tcelectronic.com/media/katz_1999_secret_mastering.pdf[/url]


  • cont.

    Level Practices

    Part I: The 20th Century Dealing With Peaks

    http://www.digido.com/bob-katz/level-practices-part-1.html

    Part II: How To Make Better Recordings in the 21st Century - An Integrated Approach to Metering, Monitoring, and Leveling Practices

    http://www.digido.com/bob-katz/level-practices-part-2-includes-the-k-system.html

    .


  • Thanks very much, Angelo. I look forward to reading through those papers.

    Colin Thomson