Reading Peter Alexanders Review, I was not quite astonished about all praise he gave for the versality and usability of the new SC.
Meanwhile I haven't had any major problems with installing at all. I've got the impression wether this was not realy a major issue for P.A. to.
honestly the most irritated I was from his conclusion about the Strings.
OK, I am european and learned to love symphonic music more with classical recordings and live concerts than in more or less subconcious recognized filmsores. In so far I dont share the penchant for anything like an "original hollywood sound".
But how about Peter Alexanders opinion, convincing strings are only achieveable in combining different sample libraries.
Is that realy true???
On one hand I am realy reluctant with combining Libraries which are recorded in totally diffrent acoustic settings, or is there any Stringlibrary out there recorded in a comparable setting to the silentstage?
On the other hand, its true there is up to now no explicit VI second Violin-section like we have a second Harp f.i., but dont we have already kind of more than one stringlibrary with Orchestral Strings, Chamberstrings and Appassionata Strings?
Perhaps I haven't worked enough yet with VI-Strings to understand P.A.'s Point, therefore I am interested, what other VI-Users think: Is it realy necessarry, or if ever anyway possible to combine VI with other Libraries to achieve more "realistic" Strings?
Steffen
Meanwhile I haven't had any major problems with installing at all. I've got the impression wether this was not realy a major issue for P.A. to.
honestly the most irritated I was from his conclusion about the Strings.
OK, I am european and learned to love symphonic music more with classical recordings and live concerts than in more or less subconcious recognized filmsores. In so far I dont share the penchant for anything like an "original hollywood sound".
But how about Peter Alexanders opinion, convincing strings are only achieveable in combining different sample libraries.
Is that realy true???
On one hand I am realy reluctant with combining Libraries which are recorded in totally diffrent acoustic settings, or is there any Stringlibrary out there recorded in a comparable setting to the silentstage?
On the other hand, its true there is up to now no explicit VI second Violin-section like we have a second Harp f.i., but dont we have already kind of more than one stringlibrary with Orchestral Strings, Chamberstrings and Appassionata Strings?
Perhaps I haven't worked enough yet with VI-Strings to understand P.A.'s Point, therefore I am interested, what other VI-Users think: Is it realy necessarry, or if ever anyway possible to combine VI with other Libraries to achieve more "realistic" Strings?
Steffen
