So do not try to debase in that way those, whose arguments you can not answer more seriously.👎
Oh yes teacher!
-
So do not try to debase in that way those, whose arguments you can not answer more seriously.👎
Oh yes teacher!
Ok you exactly did the same thing again. This thread is not meant for your aggressive personal polemics but about how to improve the Synchron Strings.
-
So do not try to debase in that way those, whose arguments you can not answer more seriously.👎
Oh yes teacher!
Ok you exactly did the same thing again. This thread is not meant for your aggressive personal polemics but about how to improve the Synchron Strings.
fahl5, ever heard of "projection"?
-
"This thread is not meant for your aggressive personal polemics but about how to improve the Synchron Strings." - fahl5
This is incredible! I tried to be nice to this guy but he has gone off the deep end.
fahl5 - every single thing you ever write is arrogant, self-centered egotism. You pretend to be talking about music, but every time you are posting here you disparage anyone who irritates you as "beginner" or an idiot.
You are utterly incapable of talking on an equal basis to Guy Bacos who OBLITERATES YOU as a MIDI programmer and musician. You can't even come close. And on top of that he is a great composer and YOU DON'T EVEN COMPOSE. Stop acting like you are god's gift to music. There are people here who are so far beyond you that you have no concept. You are an amateur, right? Does somebody pay you for that website you say is the greatest thing in sampling in your signature? Do you get paid? Guess what - the other people here do get paid, to create music. They are professionals and you are an amateur with a big mouth.
I am saying this not as a typical internet over-the-top statement, but as a serious, simple statement of an obvious fact - you are mentally ill. In your brain no one exists except as a tool for your ego. You are in fact psychopathic, because that is the definition of "psychopath" - someone who doesn't essentially care about anyone else but who simply uses them for a self-centered purpose. That is you precisely. I actually have never encountered anyone as disgustingly egotistical as you - on the internet or off.
Now start with your sarcasm, long-winded endless diatribe against me, accompanied by stupid little emoticons and fractured, abuse-of-language sentences. I don't give a rat's ass about you or your responses. You are poison.
VSL - I am sorry for this post and I won't write any more, but this guy is insulting everyone on this Forum on a regular basis.
-
"This thread is not meant for your aggressive personal polemics but about how to improve the Synchron Strings." - fahl5
This is incredible! I tried to be nice to this guy but he has gone off the deep end.
fahl5 - every single thing you ever write is arrogant, self-centered egotism. You pretend to be talking about music, but every time you are posting here you disparage anyone who irritates you as "beginner" or an idiot.
You are utterly incapable of talking on an equal basis to Guy Bacos who OBLITERATES YOU as a MIDI programmer and musician. You can't even come close. And on top of that he is a great composer and YOU DON'T EVEN COMPOSE. Stop acting like you are god's gift to music. There are people here who are so far beyond you that you have no concept. You are an amateur, right? Does somebody pay you for that website you say is the greatest thing in sampling in your signature? Do you get paid? Guess what - the other people here do get paid, to create music. They are professionals and you are an amateur with a big mouth.
I am saying this not as a typical internet over-the-top statement, but as a serious, simple statement of an obvious fact - you are mentally ill. In your brain no one exists except as a tool for your ego. You are in fact psychopathic, because that is the definition of "psychopath" - someone who doesn't essentially care about anyone else but who simply uses them for a self-centered purpose. That is you precisely. I actually have never encountered anyone as disgustingly egotistical as you - on the internet or off.
Now start with your sarcasm, long-winded endless diatribe against me, accompanied by stupid little emoticons and fractured, abuse-of-language sentences. I don't give a rat's ass about you or your responses. You are poison.
VSL - I am sorry for this post and I won't write any more, but this guy is insulting everyone on this Forum on a regular basis.
I raise a pint to you, Bill. Strongly worded, but absolutely necessary (after years of ongoing drama). Thank you for having the courage to say this. Now, hopefully, this ends the drama and we can begin a fresh chapter, where musicians and hobbyists encourage, educate, and empower each other to greater success. Cheers to all those who share their talents and knowledge in a welcoming manner here on the VSL forum!
-
Tja, gestern noch der tolle Steffen. Und heute ist wieder alles anders. Denn heute fällt wieder mal auf ... du bist ja kein „echter Komponist“ ... etc. bla, bla Du kannst hier noch so tolle Lieder posten, das wird sich nicht ändern. Die letzten 3 R. Fuchs Stücke sind ein grandioses Beispiel für das, was mit den SS1 und den SY Chambers machbar ist. Aber die Diskussion und die Kritik an den SS1 wird so oder so kein Ende nehmen. Und der Frust der Leute wird immer wieder auf dich einprasseln (weil sich von der VSL hier sowieso kein Mensch meldet) Mal im erst ... warum machst du das mit? Wenn ich du wäre ... DIE KÖNNTEN MICH ALLE!
-
Mal im erst ... warum machst du das mit? Wenn ich du wäre ... DIE KÖNNTEN MICH ALLE!Ich mache das ja gerade nicht mit. Ich teile einfach was ich mache und versuche die Diskussionen möglichst sachbezogen und möglichst wenig emotionsbezogen zu halten. Ich denke das hat VSL verdient die wirklich nach wie vor aussergewöhnliches Leisten. Aber ab einem gewissen Punkt hast du recht, ist das was die hier treiben wirklich nicht mehr mein Problem. Aber da ich unsere Pappenheimer ja kenne beeindruckt mich derlei auch nicht so sehr, als dass es mich von irgendetwas abhalten würde.
P.S.: ich fürchte was die am meisten wurmt, ist wohl das Gefühl, dass ich das Komponieren zumindest so wie es heute von vielen (hier) betrieben wird wirklich schon lange nicht mehr unbedingt als die interessanteste Herausforderung in der Musik ansehe. O Gott gleich kommt wieder der Arroganzvorwurf falls einer von denen des Deutschen mächtig ist.
Aber ist doch lustig, was für ein Gegacker im Hühnerstall aufkommt, wenn man einfach dann und wann mal an das Thema des Threads erinnert.
@ non german speaking members
OK Folks thanks to the most intellectual brilliant and constructive contributions from Acclarion, William and Guy Bacos we all know now excactly what should be improved in Synchron Strings. Great Discussion! That is the way only real 'Proffessionals' (or how ever you call those who still depend on getting payed for what they do) are able to discuss!
-
-
Since Synchron Strings are imho defenitly "worth" to be improved here are some of my suggestions what I think might improve the Synchron Strings.
- I fear one of the most important aspects to work on are the default settings, that means what a user hear, when just loading the Library without any individual tweaks or adjustments.
- why for instance does nearly all EQ's emphazise exclusivly the higher ranges, while supressing nearly always a good part of the original basis of the tone?
- why for instance should the first available legatotype be"soft" which might be nice for very slow tempos but does not sound that convincing in normal tempo especially compared to normal. Why forinstance is the "auto speed" not the default Legato making sure that withouit any tweaks the Legato would be the mostz appropriate for the certain tempo played?
- Why is Lyrical Vibrato the default setting, which agaion might be great for low dynamic and/or slow movement, while the regulare Vibrato seems to me in most other cases much nearer to what one might expect as kind of default sound.
- I know the first Volume is nothing but the first step of what will come and I also know that even if we are used to look for the whole range of different Articulationtypes VSL has ever provided and often do not expect that many Subtypes in Synchron strings are already integrated in the behavior of the existing Patches. Nerverthe less. I currently see the following "gaps" which might be wort to complete
- Of course con sordino, harmonics and sul pont should and will proably come in further Volumes.
- The Dynamics and Sfz and non legatlo patches are currently restricted on kind of extreme types, which for themself are great (the "supershort" are brrilliant!) but still dont cover the need of more moderated types
- non legato and Portato patches still seem to be usefull
- more sustained Sfz would be great
- the long cres. and decresc. are impressing for themself but in normal use types of different length and of course different shorter seem to me much more needed.
- I still love very much the realism and usability of the old pfp patches in different length, which currently could only be replaced by meticoulus CC Expression + Vel-Xfade Editing
- And Yes I would like to have another kind of more passionate Vibrato like we have even two more in the Appasionata strings. I do not miss the large section size, but those more intensive vibratos would be a great addition.
Just my humble opinion what I like to see worked on in future updates and/or further Releases.
-
Ffahl5 ... Ik denk niet dat er reden is voor dit debat.
Google translate 😜.
"I do not think there is any reason for this debate to be so."
With my all respect to you all.
Regards ,
YasirYou are absolutly right 👍
Dear Steffen, So let us know about this curious fact: you wrote very often long philosophical explanation about your own interest, that is NOT realism, but some kind of ideal performance, and is NOT precise care for details, because you like rendering huge projects in very short time, and so of course you don’t have the material time of refining details at all. This is pretty evident in your production, that is always very far from being any close to realistic, and always alternate some little good phrasing to long mechanic and midish sections. I don’t argue about your choice, you always point that you do it for your own fun, and it’s fair enough. But actually, since your scope is just having fun producing low detail long ideal electronic renderings ( sounding more or less like old ringtones) then why do you pretend to discuss details about realism and sound, that you always say are out of scope for you, and they obviously are listening to your music? There’s something weird every time you start arguing about sound, realism and precision, with people outperfoming you on sound, realism and precision. Just curiosity, before I follow William’s theory. All the best, Fabio
-
Ffahl5 ... Ik denk niet dat er reden is voor dit debat.
Google translate 😜.
"I do not think there is any reason for this debate to be so."
With my all respect to you all.
Regards ,
YasirYou are absolutly right 👍
Dear Steffen,
So let us know about this curious fact: you wrote very often long philosophical explanation about your own interest, that is NOT realism, but some kind of ideal performance, and is NOT precise care for details, because you like rendering huge projects in very short time, and so of course you don’t have the material time of refining details at all.
This is pretty evident in your production, that is always very far from being any close to realistic, and always alternate some little good phrasing to long mechanic and midish sections. I don’t argue about your choice, you always point that you do it for your own fun, and it’s fair enough.
But actually, since your scope is just having fun producing low detail long ideal electronic renderings ( sounding more or less like old ringtones) then why do you pretend to discuss details about realism and sound, that you always say are out of scope for you, and they obviously are listening to your music?
There’s something weird every time you start arguing about sound, realism and precision, with people outperfoming you on sound, realism and precision. Just curiosity, before I follow William’s theory.
All the best, Fabio+1, spot on. As is William.
Unfortunately I think only VSL can improve SyS - and that will require huge amounts of new recordings. Let's face it, it's not gonna happen. But hey, sometime in the future they will do another string library with the same "bread and butter" articulations and hopefully it will turn out better! Maybe even an upcoming sordino strings library will be performed with less attention to "perfection" and with a better working legato concept. Not holding my breath but I won't rule it out. And I think they are working on sordinos, right?
-
Dear Fabio,
This topic is called " How to improve Synchron Strings I?"
Do not disgrrace your self with simply ignoring that.
I can see why you don't like this thread turning into a Steffen Fahl bash fest. But trying to reverse it acting like a policeman in here will not make you feel better. So why not just ignore the plethora of anti-Steffen posts and stick to posting about the subject matter.
-
Definitely! That’s exactly the reason for my comment. You argue about details and sound of synchron strings with passionate ( and often irritating) criticism for others contribution, while its obvious you are not interested and not expert in sound and details. So the whole work you did with synchron strings is a very good example of what should be improved in synchron strings, despite you desperately stating the opposite. The funny detail being you avoid answer and ask to be on topic every time you are in trouble, but you are indulgent with yourself off=topics when you write your sarcastic and sad attacks to other’s opinions about... (everything lol) ok, about how to improve Synchron Strings!Dear Fabio,
This topic is called " How to improve Synchron Strings I?"
Do not disgrrace your self with simply ignoring that.
-
Dear Fabio,
This topic is called " How to improve Synchron Strings I?"
Do not disgrrace your self with simply ignoring that.
I can see why you don't like this thread turning into a Steffen Fahl bash fest. But trying to reverse it acting like a policeman in here will not make you feel better. So why not just ignore the plethora of anti-Steffen posts and stick to posting about the subject matter.
You are absolutely right. But there is time for ignoring, and there is time for reaction. An open discussion is made of human relationship, and sometime form is also important. Personally I never intend to be police, the opposite I’m just my self talking to a guy saying something surprising to me. For the rest I apologize for the off topic pollution. Now back on topic.
-
Dear Fabio if your well "education" and "profesisonal interest" dont reach further than to share your personal aggrresions for other, than please open your own bashing thread. Obviously here are enough "professionals" who have "professional" as they are nothing better to do and will be happy to join it.
Did you seriously think there is any need to answer your weird personal insults when the question here is about Synchron Strings.
-
So why not just ignore the plethora of anti-Steffen posts and stick to posting about the subject matter.
I already did just reacting on your last for good reasons self deleted posting. And as "professional" all currently active members here are. None of them even you obviously were not able to answered only ón one single suggestion. But prefer bashing me now just for I reminded everybody how this thread is called.
Wow what a rude and horrobloe arrogant crime to remind the Topic of this thread. Of course again will someone comment in a long posting how arrogant this is and further "intelligent professionals" of that type will reply with their +1 to underline how real arrogant and cruel it is to remind the Topic and how much this deserves to get bashed as fierce as ever possible.
Is that ("kindergarden" as Dietzu will presumably put it) really what you think this Forum is about. Is that what you really think is of Benefit for anyone at all.
Wake up show that you are already a reasonable adult and are able to reflect on what really might help before posting.
-
Unfortunately I think only VSL can improve SyS - and that will require huge amounts of new recordings. Let's face it, it's not gonna happen.
I certainly wouldn't settle for that.
When I am commissioned for a project and the client thinks it needs rework --whatever the reason, we talk about it and I usually get back to said project, according to what was discussed. Sometimes I feel the client is wrong because they don't know much about music. But they pay me, I deliver.
I don't think VSL has ever released a product that raised so many eyebrows. Those who voiced their concerns here and elsewhere spent money, sometimes long before the product was released. Lots of them have already had the chance to use a few other strings libraries, and thus usually provide VSL with informed, knowledgeable feedback. Sadly, what they have been getting in return so far is silence, and in my view an opportunity to raise more eyebrows (Synchronized Chamber Strings).
The competition aside, everyone wants Synchron Strings to be a great product, which at this point I think it is not. Almost all of their other libraries are, and the rest of the Synchron line certainly is. So yes, I hope VSL do consider recording new material that fixes the library's shortcomings, because any other approach will sound like a slap in their customers' faces.
I'm back to work!
