Hello Bogdan,
thanks for the friendly words.
I will ask our local hardware-gurus for their thoughts on this.
Kind regards,
/Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
194,290 users have contributed to 42,914 threads and 257,948 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 2 new thread(s), 17 new post(s) and 85 new user(s).
Hi Bogdan,
I'm a simple user since last august; I'm on a i7 980X (@ 6x4 GHz, HT on), Motherboard X58; 24 GB RAM; the most samples streamed from two 256 SSD;
that's a certified DAW for MIR and I'm very glad until today for deciding to go with those machine. Very stable, no glitches and stutters using low latencies (128 or 256) for moderate projects (until using of 14 GB RAM) - CPU usage 15 - 40 %); and works very well even for a whole orchestra - naturally I have to choice than a latency buffer between (512 until 2048), depends of the arrangement. In this way never I didn't care for the Mir requirements...On this system it hasn't been noticeable for me. Hope the informations are helpful for you.
Best
Frank
Thank you Dietz and Doubleattack for your input. Doubleattack can I ask you what is the manufacturer of the certified station ?...I'm not sure if is allowed here to put names of the other companies, but I need it is just for info. Hopefully is from VSL recommended certified stations. I'm a little bit intrigued about streaming from 2 ssds; I was thinking to construct the system by myself but I've never taken into consideration using SSD for streaming. Interesting details though. Thank you once again!
Best
B
Hello Bogdan,
the certified workstation is a vsl recommended one - build of da-x (Digital AudionetworX) Berlin. I've read somewhere that first time vsl hasn't been satisfied with the work by the Berliners, but I can confirm, that their daw for MIR is working very well! I'm really not a technic expert at all, so I can't say that for shure, but I'm very happy about their service.
I think the SSD HDs are an important part of the concept of such audio - DAW (with RAID 0 - which seems important for good streaming but don't ask me why :-) ) . Beside the noiseless write and reading, it increases the load times incredible. I'm really happy with the whole thing - every day again. Works all like a dream.
If you want to construct a system by yourself be aware that you need a good (silent!) Cooler and PSU too. As I said, I'm a complete layman regarding technic, but with a look on the specs I see that is same important for such strong systems like a powerful CPU or RAM.
Best
Frank
Many Thanks to Doubleattack and Dietz for info, it really helps to get a grasp of how to approach this new system configuration.
Anyway, I'm looking right now to see what systems they have for North America. After that, I'm going to go with MIR SE first and waiting the big update to take the full version.
Anyways, so nice of you to give me some ideas of what to choose ,
All the best
B
That's as always really a matter of taste, but the teldex studio and even every venue of the ORF studios is uniquely. IMHO the choice of the venue is very depends on the music material - so I think it's always good to have a wide range of possibilities. I find myself constantly alternate using all three roompacks, ' cause the venues of every roompack are very well selected for different requirements.
Finally speaking for myself, I find that the teldex studio has rounded off the options of the venues. So I find it very useful - for some kind of music.
Frank
Hi Agostino,
I'm away of only one click to buy this wonderful product. Just a question since you own it, possibly a silly question: how you construct for example a wind quintet or a mixed octet ? I have seen only three templates and when I tried the demo, I was more into how it sounds rather to think of constructing different arrangements?
Many Thanks
B
Hi Agostino,
Please, don't worry about "making " me to buy this software :)), I already took this decision few weeks ago. It was just a question about constructing different ensembles with MIR SE, and not achieving the perfect mix...in fact, honestly, which is the "perfect mix"? ;). Definitely, the message was intended to find out more about this feature, and not to involve someone and make him/her responsible for my actions. So, if you are willing to share how you construct different instruments arrangements with MIR SE is ok, if not, is ok also:)
I'm really sorry if my message was taken as inappropriate, it was really meant to provide me only some details from the ones who already own MIR SE
All the best,
B
bogdan, I would suggest that you read through the MIR (and MIR SE) manual. It spells things out very well. While templates are included that can get you started, you will usually be needing to create your own, as any particular piece might require a completely different instrument group.
It is very easy to set up unique templates for any sort of ensemble you might need. All you have to do is add an instrument, position it where you want it on the stage, and then create a matrix of whatever patches you need for that instrument. Do so for each instrument, and you are done. You can save each template you make for future use.
Bogdan, all your questions are perfectly valid - no need to be shy. :-)
If you want to get a feel about the basic sound of a Venue, you can always listen to the pre-rendered "Previews" we supply for MIR's Room Editor window as well as online: -> [URL]http://www.vsl.co.at/en/211/497/1687/364/1929/1581.htm[/URL]
Of course, there are complete musical demos available, too, for example here: -> [URL] http://www.vsl.co.at/en/211/497/1687/364/1967/1635.htm[/URL]
Personally, the Teldex Recording Hall is maybe the most versatile Venue available for MIR right now, and for my ears it sounds _awsome_, for single instruments as well as for big orchestras. :-)
Kind regards,