Congrats on the new computer, JWL. I value any report on your experiences, as I've persistently wondered just how much more powerful a quad 3 is contrasted to an aging G5.

"A 2-months lifespan for these 8-core Mac Pro seems very short to me." Indeed, short, but remember, the current line is all quads, with only one octo at the very high end. Steve's thoughts about a stopgap may be correct. I think Apple could not afford to lose the bleeding edge customers in the short run. They were facing a pent-up octo demand from a sliver of loyal, high-end customers, and waiting until WWDC was ill-advised. I consider this more of a mollifying than a full-blown roll-out, particularly after reading Christian's comments.

Not complaining though. Good to see progress.

Christian, can we expect VSL to give us specific benchmarks for an 8-core computer in the near future?

@Another User said:

...and waiting until WWDC was ill-advised. I consider this more of a mollifying than a full-blown roll-out, particularly after reading Christian's comments.

It's clearly not a full-blown roll-out-- there would have or should have been much more fanfare on this at the January Conference. Instead we got lots of nice, small appliances. It's clear that Apple has been working overtime to have gotten the 8-cores out the door since then.

Mollifying? Good word.

Question:

cluster craze and clock constraint... coincidence? What is it about 3 Ghz? Jobs had promised this would be surpassed on G5's three years ago. Lots have happily happened since, but it sounds as if it's been a victory harder won than expected.

Good links. Thanks.

"The Mac Pro outperforms the Power Mac G5 when it comes to integer calculations and scalar floating point calculations, while the Power Mac G5 outperforms the Mac Pro when it comes to vector floating point calculations and standard library memory performance."

Now, if only I knew how and to what extent that impacted our VI / EXS performance. Time will tell.

Do you suppose 8 core preocessors would be good enough to run MIR?

@Plowman said:

Good links. Thanks.

"The Mac Pro outperforms the Power Mac G5 when it comes to integer calculations and scalar floating point calculations, while the Power Mac G5 outperforms the Mac Pro when it comes to vector floating point calculations and standard library memory performance."

Now, if only I knew how and to what extent that impacted our VI / EXS performance. Time will tell.

Keep in mind that some of the things they used for testing might have been running under Rosetta or Boot Camp or whatever the heck it's called. Many more things are Universal Binary now, so the numbers may very well be up on the Intels. Apparently, it's had a positive impact on VI/EXS.

this is what I found at the bottom line after configuring my dream mac:

$14,258.00

:=(|)

However if you didn't buy hard drives, RAM or monitors from Apple it would be considerably less.

8 Core Mac Pro with airport card and ATI1900XT graphics: $4295
16GB RAM from Other World Computing $2049
4 500GB Wester Digital RE 16 SATA drives from NewEgg computer: $620
or 4 750GB Seagate SATA drives from NewEgg computer: $1240
If you want a 30" monitor you can get a Dell 3007WFP-HC for $1499 instead of the Apple 30" for $1799.

Thus you could get an Octo MacPro equipped with 16GB of RAM, 2TB of storage and able to drive two 30" monitors for $6964. Still not cheap, but less... but no doubt, you want the fibre channel stuff too in the "dream" machine?

http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/04/05/mac.pro.special.xeon/

That's the chip they're using.

By the way, it's worth spending a little more for the Apple 30" display if you stare at these things all day long. When it first came out it was way too expensive, but I got mine a year ago (when it was considerably more than it is now but considerably less than when it first came out) and am extremely happy with it.

i've been long thinking about going fibre or not (not only on a mac) but finally there is only little improvement compared to gigabit etherent.
having to lay new cabeling, purchasing new switches, several incompatibilities (i Gbit, 2 Gbit, 4 Gbit speed) made me look more into iSCSI ...
christian

if you want to do something really good to your eyes ... http://www.eizo.com/products/lcd/S2411W/index.asp unfortunately up to 24" currently

@Another User said:

I doubt Apple will release redesigned Mac Pros at WWDC in June. A 2-months lifespan for these 8-core Mac Pro seems very short to me.

To me it seems like the way this was quietly introduced as just another build-to-order option rather than a new model makes me think you're right, although I remember reading something about another event coming up in a couple of weeks; maybe this is a subtle statement that the 8-core machines people have been anticipating at that event aren't the big news.

But really the question we need to be asking is what this means to musicians. The idea of having eight processors to handle plug-ins (both instrument and processing) is appealing, but is that going to happen? I've read lots of conflicting reports about how this works - that the OS handles it automatically and it will make a big difference, that it does very little and won't make a difference, that developers can address individual cores, that they can't...I have no idea what it means.

@cm said:

if you want to do something really good to your eyes ... http://www.eizo.com/products/lcd/S2411W/index.asp unfortunately up to 24" currently

any price ?

@Another User said:

But really the question we need to be asking is what this means to musicians. The idea of having eight processors to handle plug-ins (both instrument and processing) is appealing, but is that going to happen? I've read lots of conflicting reports about how this works - that the OS handles it automatically and it will make a big difference, that it does very little and won't make a difference, that developers can address individual cores, that they can't...I have no idea what it means.

Yeah, it required an update to Logic Pro to use 4-cores, and for what I know they're still not being used all the time... so how's 8-cores going to help us, that's a good question!

J.

The price of the Eizo monitor is $1504 at CDW, $1486 at PC Nation. Looks like a terrific monitor - but not inexpensive.

As far as the 8 core machine is concerned, since everyone seems to be speculating, I'll speculate a little more too. It seems possible that Apple released the 8 core machine now so that it would have it to demonstrate the new version of Final Cut - - and possibly of Logic (Amazon lists a book - Logic Pro X Power by Don Gunn and Orren Merton - for release on April 30, 2007, so there might be some cause to think that this correctly reflects the name of the update.) at NAB next week.

As Nick observes this machine is listed as a build-to-order option - not a new model. Similarly, Barefeats.com notes that this machine has the same chassis as the other models, no Blu-ray option, no support for bridging graphics cards (i.e.SLI), same limit of 26 lanes in the PCIe bus, same speed on frontside bus. Thus it seems possible (at least to me) that this machine really is a stopgap and that new models of the Mac Pro with a different physical appearance and improvements in functionality are in the not too distant future. In any case, Barefeats.com states that it has ordered this machine and will publish test results involving multi-processor aware applications as soon as it has received and tested it.

Did Dennis Gunn co-write a book with Orren?!

I had no idea. Orren's great, but Dennis is an ornery so-and-so. [:)]

No, I just talked to Orren - it is Don Gunn. And X means "unknown." It's been on Amazon over a year.

These 8-core machines look like a bit of a stop-gap to me... A good friend of mine, who keeps a pretty close eye on the technology game, has been urging me to hold off on a new Mac Pro until the fall, when PCIe 2.0 is likely to be showing up in production. He's figuring there will be some pretty major board-level improvements at that time, which will have a significant impact on RAM capacity, performance, and price.

Any thoughts, cm?

J.

true - 45nm process, new chipsets (ICH9), possibly some E (extreme = more cache) types, ... as already mentioned - too much heat for my taste currently