Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

200,823 users have contributed to 43,214 threads and 259,138 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 7 new post(s) and 52 new user(s).

  • http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/04/05/mac.pro.special.xeon/

    That's the chip they're using.

    By the way, it's worth spending a little more for the Apple 30" display if you stare at these things all day long. When it first came out it was way too expensive, but I got mine a year ago (when it was considerably more than it is now but considerably less than when it first came out) and am extremely happy with it.

  • i've been long thinking about going fibre or not (not only on a mac) but finally there is only little improvement compared to gigabit etherent.
    having to lay new cabeling, purchasing new switches, several incompatibilities (i Gbit, 2 Gbit, 4 Gbit speed) made me look more into iSCSI ...
    christian

    and remember: only a CRAY can run an endless loop in just three seconds.
  • if you want to do something really good to your eyes ... http://www.eizo.com/products/lcd/S2411W/index.asp unfortunately up to 24" currently

    and remember: only a CRAY can run an endless loop in just three seconds.
  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    I doubt Apple will release redesigned Mac Pros at WWDC in June. A 2-months lifespan for these 8-core Mac Pro seems very short to me.


    To me it seems like the way this was quietly introduced as just another build-to-order option rather than a new model makes me think you're right, although I remember reading something about another event coming up in a couple of weeks; maybe this is a subtle statement that the 8-core machines people have been anticipating at that event aren't the big news.

    But really the question we need to be asking is what this means to musicians. The idea of having eight processors to handle plug-ins (both instrument and processing) is appealing, but is that going to happen? I've read lots of conflicting reports about how this works - that the OS handles it automatically and it will make a big difference, that it does very little and won't make a difference, that developers can address individual cores, that they can't...I have no idea what it means.

  • last edited
    last edited

    @cm said:

    if you want to do something really good to your eyes ... http://www.eizo.com/products/lcd/S2411W/index.asp unfortunately up to 24" currently

    any price ?

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    But really the question we need to be asking is what this means to musicians. The idea of having eight processors to handle plug-ins (both instrument and processing) is appealing, but is that going to happen? I've read lots of conflicting reports about how this works - that the OS handles it automatically and it will make a big difference, that it does very little and won't make a difference, that developers can address individual cores, that they can't...I have no idea what it means.


    Yeah, it required an update to Logic Pro to use 4-cores, and for what I know they're still not being used all the time... so how's 8-cores going to help us, that's a good question!

    J.

  • The price of the Eizo monitor is $1504 at CDW, $1486 at PC Nation. Looks like a terrific monitor - but not inexpensive.

    As far as the 8 core machine is concerned, since everyone seems to be speculating, I'll speculate a little more too. It seems possible that Apple released the 8 core machine now so that it would have it to demonstrate the new version of Final Cut - - and possibly of Logic (Amazon lists a book - Logic Pro X Power by Don Gunn and Orren Merton - for release on April 30, 2007, so there might be some cause to think that this correctly reflects the name of the update.) at NAB next week.

    As Nick observes this machine is listed as a build-to-order option - not a new model. Similarly, Barefeats.com notes that this machine has the same chassis as the other models, no Blu-ray option, no support for bridging graphics cards (i.e.SLI), same limit of 26 lanes in the PCIe bus, same speed on frontside bus. Thus it seems possible (at least to me) that this machine really is a stopgap and that new models of the Mac Pro with a different physical appearance and improvements in functionality are in the not too distant future. In any case, Barefeats.com states that it has ordered this machine and will publish test results involving multi-processor aware applications as soon as it has received and tested it.

  • Did Dennis Gunn co-write a book with Orren?!

    I had no idea. Orren's great, but Dennis is an ornery so-and-so. [:)]

    No, I just talked to Orren - it is Don Gunn. And X means "unknown." It's been on Amazon over a year.

  • These 8-core machines look like a bit of a stop-gap to me... A good friend of mine, who keeps a pretty close eye on the technology game, has been urging me to hold off on a new Mac Pro until the fall, when PCIe 2.0 is likely to be showing up in production. He's figuring there will be some pretty major board-level improvements at that time, which will have a significant impact on RAM capacity, performance, and price.

    Any thoughts, cm?

    J.

  • true - 45nm process, new chipsets (ICH9), possibly some E (extreme = more cache) types, ... as already mentioned - too much heat for my taste currently

    and remember: only a CRAY can run an endless loop in just three seconds.