Angelo,
Yeah, and so I'm responding to him. So what's your point? You have no point. Just attempting to contradict me in general, huh?
What neither you nor Mathis respond to is what I was disturbed by - Boulez trashing all of previous composers and music history in favor of....
himself.
That is my problem. That someone that arrogant and childish, would be put up as something to "study." As Mathis suggests. But since you contradict me, I must assume you approve of all that trashing he did, as Mathis does. So, you believe he - Mr. Boulez - is superior to not only Beethoven, but Mozart, Tchaikovsky AND J.S. Bach.
O.K. Whatever... [8-)]
Yeah, and so I'm responding to him. So what's your point? You have no point. Just attempting to contradict me in general, huh?
What neither you nor Mathis respond to is what I was disturbed by - Boulez trashing all of previous composers and music history in favor of....
himself.
That is my problem. That someone that arrogant and childish, would be put up as something to "study." As Mathis suggests. But since you contradict me, I must assume you approve of all that trashing he did, as Mathis does. So, you believe he - Mr. Boulez - is superior to not only Beethoven, but Mozart, Tchaikovsky AND J.S. Bach.
O.K. Whatever... [8-)]