The Vaughn Williams score is not significant as a film score. Who the hell pays the slightest attention to that film? It is significant as a basis for the 7th symphony, which contradicts it as a film score. In other words, it was undeveloped as a film score and could go further as a symphony.
You could never say that about Herrmann. His only symphony was a rather mediocre work, but his film scores are the best ever composed.
Though Things to Come is a very good score, I agree on that one. I'm not sure it is one of the greatest, since the film was such a primordial work. Very uneven, largely as a result of H.G. Wells' tampering influence.
I agree with Paul on the quality of the film. For example, Basic Instinct. A piece of shit, completely devoid of the slightest trace of value of any possible kind. Though it made money, of course. As a pathetic commentary on the stupidity of its audiences. The fact that a great composer like Goldsmith has to write for a piece of crap like that is a travesty, and a commentary on the abyssmal level that Hollywood has sunk to.
You could never say that about Herrmann. His only symphony was a rather mediocre work, but his film scores are the best ever composed.
Though Things to Come is a very good score, I agree on that one. I'm not sure it is one of the greatest, since the film was such a primordial work. Very uneven, largely as a result of H.G. Wells' tampering influence.
I agree with Paul on the quality of the film. For example, Basic Instinct. A piece of shit, completely devoid of the slightest trace of value of any possible kind. Though it made money, of course. As a pathetic commentary on the stupidity of its audiences. The fact that a great composer like Goldsmith has to write for a piece of crap like that is a travesty, and a commentary on the abyssmal level that Hollywood has sunk to.