@DaveTubaKing said:
Derek Jarman's "War Requiem" - Benjamin Britten
The Score to 2001 Space Odyssey - several contributors.
Death in Venice - again several contributors.
But if I must play the game properly then;
Scott of the Antarctic - Vaughan Williams
The Belles of St Trinians - Malcolm Arnold
Things to Come - Arthur Bliss
Hehehehe.
The Belles of St Trinians works really well - I watched that tons of times at the cinema when I was a kid and the whole thing was excellent. Of course, Alistair Sim makes a massive difference. Also, The Green Man shows Alastair Sim at his fantastic, sardonic best. A great comedy film actor - one of the greatest probably.
Scott of the Antartic by Vaughan Williams - later to become a full blown symphony has been copied a thousand times.
Also, William Walton could write for film now and again. Battle of the Skies is too good for most filmscore writers today - and indeed, most of his Battle of Britain score was apparently too good for the director at the time.
But I think it's fair to say that most people today have absolutely no idea about what makes a good film score - partly because they have no sense of history whatsoever - and partly because they wouldn't know a good film if it came up and tatooed them on the ass 'THIS IS A GREAT FILM FOREVER'.
This is always the trouble with this type of discussion. They seem to think a film is no good if it doesn't entertain them within 5 nanoseconds or they don't like it for whatever reason.
There are tons of films I personally don't like that are absolutely brilliant - that's the difference between objectivity and being slavishly subjective when discussing this particualr artform.
Rule No. 1 - the filmscore doesn't mean shit if the film is no good.
Rule No. 2 - the filmscore is there to enhance the film.
Rule No. 3 - the filmscore doesn't mean shit if the film is no good.