@Dietz said:
Ha! I could point you to mixes I did which would make you reconsider that wish. ;-D
I find that hard to believe [:)]
192,762 users have contributed to 42,853 threads and 257,641 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 19 new post(s) and 167 new user(s).
@Dietz said:
Ha! I could point you to mixes I did which would make you reconsider that wish. ;-D
I find that hard to believe [:)]
@Pyre said:
Apologies, I got my wires crossed somewhere, I vaguely remember hearing somewhere on here that Dimension Woodwinds wouldn't be necessary, and must have confused that with Herb's comments in the Dimension Strings interview about the differences in chord arrangements for woodwinds.
I didn't mean to imply that Herb never said this, apologies! Just that I don't recall the source of the comments we're discussing.
@jhstrong said:
I wouldn't be surprised if they finally released the strings as DL Insturments. They've covered pretty much everything from the major collections to individual instruments, so I'm feeling like it might be time for the Solo Strings to become DL Instruments.
They already are DL instruments, aren't they? I downloaded all of DS.
Here are my suggestions:
A violin section where the bowing uses different directions while playing various sustained notes and legato. For example: if you have 14 players, 7 would play legato and/or sustain up-bow and the other 7 players would play down-bow.
I would love to have open strings for solo, chamber, and orchestral strings.
While I am dreaming I will suggest Baroque instruments.
Another month of Discounts !
But, still nothing new announced [:^)]
Maybe Sept. ? or Oct. ? ..... or 2015 ? ... ?
@esperlad said:
For example: if you have 14 players, 7 would play legato and/or sustain up-bow and the other 7 players would play down-bow.
I would love to have open strings for solo, chamber, and orchestral strings.
Well, one of your dreams has come true. Dimension Strings has open strings, and the option to automatically "force" them or avoid them as you wish.
As for your other request, I don't see why you would want your players to use different bowing from one another. So much of string bowing is cenetered around the most natural way to play a line, and any good conductor would keep that mostly consistent. Sure you'll have one or two players who sometimes feel more comfortable bowing differently, but that's the exception, not the rule, and most lines have a very obvious natural rhythm to a string player. Downbeats will tend to suggest a stronger downbow, upbeats will tend to suggest a lighter upbow, if there's a longer sustained note coming up they'll alter their bowing to prepare for it, etc. Rather than to make an option where half the players use a downbow vs the other players using an upbow, I'd love to see an option to control the starting bow and the bowchanges thereafter. The difference is subtle but it could potentially breathe some more life into the samples. In my opinion it's too subtle to really worry much about, though.
Will we see new and exciting VSL products in Sept. ? or just another discount offer ?
Before Vienna Imperial, I don't think there was much discussion about the benefit of 100 velocity layers, but of course the result is astonishing. Perhaps we'll see orchestral instruments with more velocity layers, although it was necessary to have a machine play the Boesendorfer to get the velocities accurate enough- so I don't see so many layers in the near future. With Dimension instruments it's possible to simulate the effect of intermediate velocities, but it would be fascinating to hear what more layers would do for the solo instruments.
I'd love to know what's going on behind the scenes at the moment.