I have a few questions for VSL, I'm trying to keep them as generic as possible.
When VSL completes the massively desired 'divisi library', I'm wanting to know whether there is a desire to build the libraries the same way as existing libraries or if VSL has thought about exploring more options. Whether that be more types of articulations than before, or a different approach to divisi than HS or DVZ are using. I'm wanting to know whether VSL is simply going to have Violin Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb and that's it... or if VSL is thinking more 'outside the box' in some way or form. I'm not asking what VSL will specifically do but simply if it is something more than the current paradigm VSL has had previously.
If VSL started recording today (I surely hope not! lol) how long-ish might it take to complete such a library? I know that VSL could have started a year ago, and may not even start for a year... but I'm curious as I have no idea how long these things take. If it was started today, would we likely be looking at 1 year, 5 years, tomorrow? lol - I'm curious about the time it takes on VSL's part, from recording, editing, to completion.
This is my only question that I think may not be able to be answered. I'm concerned about the size of the new library, not storage but the string sections. I know I won't get specifics, but where I'm concerned is Orchestral v Appassionata v __________? I don't want to see an all new orchestral library that is just divisi and nothing new other than that. Will it be the exact same as one of the current libraries (not asking which one) or will it be an absolutely new library? My concern is that I don't want 1) an addition to an existing library or 2) a replacement for an existing library (something that essentially is the Orchestral string library, but divisi instead). Will it be more than the current offerings other than simply adding divisi strings?
Thanks,
Sean