196,245 users have contributed to 43,015 threads and 258,398 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 1 new thread(s), 7 new post(s) and 152 new user(s).
I just have another question. Is the standard library more than enough since it includes all the articulations? Will I really need all those extra mic positions to make a good sound, or are the standard mics good enough?
I would say the standard library is enough, unless you need to work in Surround and 3D sound formats. The mics available in the standard library are more than sufficient for a standard stereo production and sound great.
Thanks for the information, JimmyHellfire.
Regards,
Richard
I just have another question. Is the standard library more than enough since it includes all the articulations? Will I really need all those extra mic positions to make a good sound, or are the standard mics good enough?
I would say the standard library is enough, unless you need to work in Surround and 3D sound formats. The mics available in the standard library are more than sufficient for a standard stereo production and sound great.
This thread is pointless as the people here simply want to be negative to establish themselves as experts.
I started it as a celebration of a great new library but that doesn't fit in with the agenda of the people on this Forum, so...
Goodbye.
To be very honest I don't think people spend hundreds of USD/€ just to "establish themselves as experts" nor the way of establishing it is "to be negative".
I'm happy you are happy, and I wish you lot of satisfaction with your new fairly expensive toy.
I'm not equally happy with the missing opportunity of discussing details that may give to VSL team interesting technical and emotional feedback from users, not only from the "celebration" side, but from the disappointment and improvement side as well. Nothing is more valuable for product managers and developers than detailed feedback.
cheers.
I just have another question. Is the standard library more than enough since it includes all the articulations? Will I really need all those extra mic positions to make a good sound, or are the standard mics good enough?
Good enough depends on your personal taste. On Synchron Percussion there is a comparision between Stereo Mix and Surround to Stereo Downmix. Might be nice to have something for Synchron Strings as well.
I just have another question. Is the standard library more than enough since it includes all the articulations? Will I really need all those extra mic positions to make a good sound, or are the standard mics good enough?
Hi Richard,
nice to meet you again! Yes I confirm it: yesterday i did quite a bit of experiments with Dimension and Chamber strings and MIR Pro. I wasn't able of replicating the nice sonic balance of Synchron strings default stereo mix, that always sounds better than any of my attempt to mix in MIR Pro old lybraries then finally I consider it a real added value (it was my main doubt buying the lybrary).
ciao, Fabio.
This thread is pointless as the people here simply want to be negative to establish themselves as experts.
I started it as a celebration of a great new library but that doesn't fit in with the agenda of the people on this Forum, so...
Goodbye.
Unfortunately, this seems common, especially with composers. It is one reason I don't participate at most composer forums anymore. I, for one, was glad to see your enthusiastic post. I am very optimistic about Synchron Strings, and any future Synchron products.
There is no reason for people to hijack a positive thread. They could easily start a new one, and should. Enjoy Synchron, I know I am. It has already made its way into my current film score.
This thread is pointless as the people here simply want to be negative to establish themselves as experts. I started it as a celebration of a great new library but that doesn't fit in with the agenda of the people on this Forum, so... Goodbye.Unfortunately, this seems common, especially with composers. It is one reason I don't participate at most composer forums anymore. I, for one, was glad to see your enthusiastic post. I am very optimistic about Synchron Strings, and any future Synchron products. There is no reason for people to hijack a positive thread. They could easily start a new one, and should. Enjoy Synchron, I know I am. It has already made its way into my current film score. Well, there certainly is a reason for this thread being 'hijacked', which is the extraordinary claims that were made about this library ... I am sure, otherwise Jimmy would have just created a new thread to express his opinion. It is quite funny, because on the other forum Jimmy was punished for defending this library against sceptics, here it is the other way around! This just shows me that some people seem to have a problem with other people having a different opinion and expressing it. Personally, I respect everyone here who thinks this is the best string library there is. I may disagree with it and explain, why, but I won't degrade their opinions by claiming such things, as you did. By those accusations you do nothing but making a fool of yourself.
This just shows me that some people seem to have a problem with other people having a different opinion and expressing it. Personally, I respect everyone here who thinks this is the best string library there is.
If you respect others opinions, then let the OP have his thread. I don't see why that would be a problem. It would be more productive to post complaints in a separate thread anyway as it is easier for developers to read and respond.
This just shows me that some people seem to have a problem with other people having a different opinion and expressing it.Personally, I respect everyone here who thinks this is the best string library there is.If you respect others opinions, then let the OP have his thread. I don't see why that would be a problem. It would be more productive to post complaints in a separate thread anyway as it is easier for developers to read and respond. I posted this a few times in the past and I post it a last time now. A perfect Community has a separate Bugreport-Collection-area. This should be visible in the Header like Forum-rules and announcements. That will be the bestcase-Situation for developers and Users. (BTW do i think this will stop SOME conflicts in the Community)
Well, there certainly is a reason for this thread being 'hijacked', which is the extraordinary claims that were made about this library ... I am sure, otherwise Jimmy would have just created a new thread to express his opinion. It is quite funny, because on the other forum Jimmy was punished for defending this library against sceptics, here it is the other way around! This just shows me that some people seem to have a problem with other people having a different opinion and expressing it.
Yeah, it's funny. On V.I. Control, I'm the blind, deaf and retardedly loyal "fanboy" who would jump off a bridge if Herb told me to, and here, I'm the thread hijacking leader of the pitchfork wielding horde. 😊
Actually I'm sorry for "hijacking" the thread. But indeed, I felt that it was important to relativize what to me seemed like a somewhat misplaced and misleading hymn of praise, while in fact elsewhere legitimate criticism is being raised. For the sake of objectivity and to put things into a real perspective. I thought it was important to make sure that genuine VSL users voice their concerns here, without the noise and hyperbole of people in other forums who seemingly find more interest and joy in starting bush fires than anything else.
Perhaps a thread of its own would have been better though. Maybe an administrator could split off the posts in a new thread. And call it "Synchron is not yet the best!" or something ... 😃
If you respect others opinions, then let the OP have his thread. I don't see why that would be a problem.That's not how a forum works. It's a place for discussion, not an echo chamber for whoever started the thread.
Right. Then discuss, but no need to counter someone's opinion just because they offered one you disagree with.
This is why forums aren't considered viable places for discussion for many of us - "how a forum works" currently isn't how constructive, respectful dialogue works. That is one reason I (and most of my colleagues that I know of) don't spend much time on forums anymore; also simply too busy. And here I am being reminded why I don't usually post on forums. Back to work.
Congrats to VSL on Synchron! Love the stage too - hope to record there at some point.
Hi Fabio,
Thanks for the information. Is this the same Fabio from the GPO community!?
Regards,
Richard
I just have another question. Is the standard library more than enough since it includes all the articulations? Will I really need all those extra mic positions to make a good sound, or are the standard mics good enough?
Hi Richard,
nice to meet you again! Yes I confirm it: yesterday i did quite a bit of experiments with Dimension and Chamber strings and MIR Pro. I wasn't able of replicating the nice sonic balance of Synchron strings default stereo mix, that always sounds better than any of my attempt to mix in MIR Pro old lybraries then finally I consider it a real added value (it was my main doubt buying the lybrary).
ciao, Fabio.
It's a matter of phases problem when you have to crossfade between different samples..
There is a phase issue when a sample is played twice, not with different samples, or we couldn't listen to 2 violins playing together. There are nice phase effects, not phase problems.
It's a matter of phases problem when you have to crossfade between different samples..
There is a phase issue when a sample is played twice, not with different samples, or we couldn't listen to 2 violins playing together. There are nice phase effects, not phase problems.
Crossfading between velocity layers is a much complex task, and phases are a problem.
I'm afraid there are much more phase problems in the audio world than you could imagine.
The one you mentioned is just one exemple of phase issue that leads to a Comb Filter effect (in fact is probably the only one that is used as a creative effect, and it's even used to create digital reverbs...). Crossfading between velocity layers is a much complex task, and phases are a problem.
Deterios surdus eo nullus, qui renuit audire.
If crossfading between two layers should be a problem, mixing two similar sources should always be a problem too. Phase effect always occur everywhere in a stereo field. It may be more or less prominent but never a "phase issue" we can encounter with one single sample. And I disagree with your rule "phases are a problem when crossfading between velocity layers", as soon as they're made of different samples.Think of it like this: When playing one sample of 8 violins, you hear 8 violins. If you mix (crossfade) this by 50% with another sample of 8 violins, you hear a composite of 16 violins. It's more apparent with crossfading solo strings (where you will suddenly hear 2 instruments when mixing two samples), however the same effect still applies to ensembles. It may not bother you, but it's hard to deny that it's an issue.
