Hello again as well, Vlad.

Thanks for your kind response. Nothing against your favourite library and also nothing against your favourite room and mixing system.

Keep it, use it, love it.

All the rest is of course a matter of taste: distant orchestra, close orchestra - unfortunately discussions always end in this never ending "impass".

About the "Ferrari for shopping": Each articulation seems to come 8times or more with DS (one for each player) in case of the violins.

But it seems to me that most of the users only use them as one sound. So, having tonnes of samples on board but only using them always as one sound brought me to the comparison with the Ferrari and 30km/h... maybe a bit a daring comparison, sorry, but it probably contains a core of truth.

Once more: Watch the DS-video please http://www.vsl.co.at/videoplayer_mp4.asp?ID=304. from 04:30...

Now we changed 1000 words and I didn't get a demo...

I don't want to discuss about libraries and effects...

I only hope to listen to a string piece which contains obviously the big advantage of the Dimensions: The individual play of each musician in unison.

I would like a demo...because I never heard such a piece with the "Dimension" of DS.

Thanks

Beat

@Beat Kaufmann said:

... 

Why do you consider that advantage to be the obviously big one? To me the obvious advantage is the ability to process the audio output from each violin separately. In a different context, you seem to appreciate this advantage:

[quote=Beat Kaufmann]... I ... want to be free in adjusting the depth for each instrument... to my taste (by mixing the conventional way).

But as your Chambers don't allow you to do that, you overlook the obvious advantage provided by DS in that respect.

Hi BachRules

Thanks for your answers.

But, dear BachRules, I am since 1975 in the midi business and since 2003 (power) user of VSL samples. So believe me, I know, what I'm looking for...

@Another User said:

[quote=Beat Kaufmann]... I ... want to be free in adjusting the depth for each instrument... to my taste (by mixing the conventional way).

But as your Chambers don't allow you to do that, you overlook the obvious advantage provided by DS in that respect.

1. I could route every VI to another output within my DAW if necessary... (16 outputs, with my everday AudioInterface / 192 Outputs with my madi system).

2. You missed the context ... I gave this answer  because I don't want demos "trough" MIR because I love to mix the conventional way and not with an automatic mixing system.

Unfortuately even more words and even less demos ... sad.

Once more

I don't want to discuss libraries, techniques, effects, 

I only would like to get a DS orchestra demo

played with the individual trigger mode,

please, please please!!!

A link is enough

This seems to be an unrealizable wish...[:(]

Sorry my impatience.

Beat

@Beat Kaufmann said:

Can some body publish a DS-Demo ...

A) ...which shows all 8 violins individual triggered

Sorry if you already know this, but when you send the same MIDI data to all 8 Dimension violins, each violin gets triggered with different "Humanize" settings. In other words, the time-randomization and tuning randomization are different for each violin. That could be considered "individual triggering", depending on semantics.

It seems odd that no one seems to have grasped what Beat is asking for here,

One of the first things I did with Dimension strings, was to play the same thing eight times, each to a dimension player. It is a long winded way of doing things,  but that is how a real orchestra play, so it seemed to me the best way to do it.

How ever it did take a long time to do this, and when you do a similar thing with playing once and using VI Pro to randomize timing for each player, it also gets close to the same effect.

My recording unfortuanaley for Beat,  was processed through MIR, so I can't offer a dry demo either, 

but I do think Beat's request for a dry multi played layer demo is a reasonable request.

@Beat Kaufmann said:

... I ... want to be free in adjusting the depth for each instrument... to my taste (by mixing the conventional way).

But as your Chambers don't allow you to do that, you overlook the obvious advantage provided by DS in that respect.

1. I could route every VI to another output within my DAW if necessary... (16 outputs, with my everday AudioInterface / 192 Outputs with my madi system).

You're talking about routing VI's separately, but I'm talking about routing violins separately. I can put the 8 Dimension violins in different positions in a virtual room (not MIR, since you don't want that), and they all reflect off the walls at different times, since they're in different positions, and the left and right mics in a virtual Decca-tree capture the sounds at different times. You cannot do this with Chamber, even if you route your VI's separately.

@andyjh said:

It seems odd that no one seems to have grasped what Beat is asking for here,

I grasp it, but haven't found the time to meet his demands. This thread is still pretty new. I'm not so pessimistic that Beat's demands won't be met eventually.

@BachRules said:

You cannot do this with Chamber, even if you route your VI's separately.

OK then, my dear, let's listen to such an orchestra with individual placed players. 

Take A/B, ORTF, a DeccaTree, NOS, DIN, EBS, Surroound...  for me only counts the result.

I want to come as close as possible to those real recordings. And I thought that the DS could go a step further. 

But all the Demos don't show a really step foreward. Quite the oposit, I don't like the sound (MIR?) and when the are syncronized the sound not realy how an ensemble.

But I'm repeating my self - words words words but obviously no demo.

@andyjh said:

How ever it did take a long time to do this, and when you do a similar thing with playing once and using VI Pro to randomize timing for each player, it also gets close to the same effect.

Hi Andy

This is really a good hint.

Even if I am a trained user I still need 1day for 1 minute of music (average).

So this means that I will use a lot more time for eventually a bit more reality.

Thanks, and yes it seems that nobody had the patience to produce a piece which obviously uses a much more effort.

Best

Beat

@Another User said:

when you send the same MIDI data to all 8 Dimension violins, each violin gets triggered with different "Humanize" settings. In other words, the time-randomization and tuning randomization are different for each violin. That could be considered "individual triggering"....

Greetings,

I share Beat's position on DS, and would like to hear a demo which depicts clearly the aforementioned aspects of the product. Most demos I found worked in disservice for DS, because I believe they were made with the intention of showcasing its overall sound. However, more experienced users usually expect a technical demonstration, and I think that is lacking in sound form. 

@Beat Kaufmann said:

... Can some body publish a DS-Demo ...

A) ...which shows all 8 violins individual triggered or even played with individual articulations?

Can you recommend any particular pieces where Bach scored 8 different articulations for 8 violins playing in unison? If I understand your request correctly? If not Bach, then Beethoven?

@Tralen said:

Greetings,

I share Beat's position on DS, and would like to hear a demo which depicts clearly the aforementioned aspects of the product. Most demos I found worked in disservice for DS, because I believe they were made with the intention of showcasing its overall sound. However, more experienced users usually expect a technical demonstration, and I think that is lacking in sound form. 

Hi Tralen,

maybe this video is helpful for you. (the part from TC 4:20 to 5:30)

http://www.vsl.co.at/videoplayer_mp4.asp?ID=304

best

Herb

@BachRules said:

Can you recommend any particular pieces where Bach scored 8 different articulations

No restrictions. Bach, Mozart, Haydn what ever... 

Beat

I'm not about to make anything that sounds close to that, and few here are, regardless of their choice of libraries; and you already knew that. So I'm not going to try to compare to that, but if you want to post a short, simple example of Chamber violins (or some other Chamber instrument, but just one, please), sticking to one and only one articulation, I'll try to make a DS version of what you post. Otherwise, it's going to be a question of who's better at programming articulations, which seems irrelevant for all present intents and purposes.

Dear Bachrules, thanks a lot for your great help for me to get a DS demo.

The thread here shows that obviously even power users don't use this "multiple-option" because it seems to need a lot of additional work.

So your effort is very kind, BachRules, and you all who wanted to help me till now. But, nobody should produce an extra demo for me.

So I suggest to wait until the end of this weekend and when nobody has a demo - then nobody has one.

Could be that G. Bacos will produce once one one - now with the basses inclusive.

I still believe in a huge undiscovered potential of DS - showed within some seconds in the DS-Video...

So let us being patient ...

Beat

@Beat Kaufmann said:

Dear Bachrules, thanks a lot for your great help for me to get a DS demo.

The thread here shows that obviously even power users don't use this "multiple-option" because it seems to need a lot of additional work.

So your effort is very kind, BachRules, and you all who wanted to help me till now. But, nobody should produce an extra demo for me.

So I suggest to wait until the end of this weekend and when nobody has a demo - then nobody has one.

Could be that G. Bacos will produce once one one - now with the basses inclusive.

I still believe in a huge undiscovered potential of DS - showed within some seconds in the DS-Video...

So let us being patient ...

Beat

This thread shows that people lacking Dimension Cellos -- even power-users / articulation-extremists lacking Dimension Cellos -- are unable to achieve such a wide cello sound as this:

[url]https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5ZYXb_HdIQhVEFEdXE2UVRnbTg/edit?usp=sharing[/url]

Maybe Beat can produce something comparable with the Chamber Cellos. Let's wait until the end of this weekend and if nobody achieves such width using only Chamber Cellos - then nobody achieves it. I'll wait patiently.

@Beat Kaufmann said:

But, dear BachRules, I am since 1975 in the midi business

What was it like using MIDI a decade before it was invented?

@John Melcher said:

That's pretty amazing, since the MIDI specification was published in 1983.

Hi Mr. Detective

OK, you are right, nevertheless I bought my first Roland Synthesizer in 1975. It was an SH-7 (which came on the market in 1973) and of course it was controlled by Voltage (CV).

Of course I only wanted to say that I'm an "old hand" in the synthetic sound and sample world. [:@]

Give us a link for listening to your "much-more-realistic-orchestra", please. So we have at least one demo even if it is not quite the one I like to have.

Beat