Musos, you are apparently presumptious. First you PRESUME that I missed your point, then you PRESUME that your explanation could be the only situation to encapsulate all scenarios and then draw definitve (read: NOT open) conclusion(s) based on your presumptions. Dude, there are more possibilities out there than what you can think of, you know? So, having said my piece on that, I will respond to what you've said:
No hard feelings at all mate, but it's just a little annoying to have to be up against such incredible conlusions, some of which were directly about my own conclusions which you at this point can only have misunderstood as such.
Peace and let's be a little more open next time. To be so conclusive is how countries fall, religions murder, evil reigns, etc. The best thing that ever happened to human nature was when we said, "I am not sure."
Evan Evans
I understand your point, but do NOT agree.Try not to be so quick to jump to conclusions. Einstein worked his whole life trying to prove certian theories. He never concluded anything. Some of his theories were later able to be tested and concluded using the scientific method. But he never PRESUMED to have CONCLUSIVE results unless he did!
Colin
No hard feelings at all mate, but it's just a little annoying to have to be up against such incredible conlusions, some of which were directly about my own conclusions which you at this point can only have misunderstood as such.
Peace and let's be a little more open next time. To be so conclusive is how countries fall, religions murder, evil reigns, etc. The best thing that ever happened to human nature was when we said, "I am not sure."
Evan Evans