@evanevans said:
Mouthing off
I never said you were stupid nor as such -- read the post again. If you're too lazy to see that it was me, then you were obviously too lazy to read what I wrote. This 'respect for the individual' mumbojumbo is laughable. You came across as arrogant and I called you on it.
You came across as saying you dictated every note and every fingering for every instrument. That *is* arrogant. If that's not what you meant, and you meant to say "in certain situations" then that's fine. However, those players will see the alternate marking and more than likely ignore it and go for one that's easier to use, and has the correct timbre of the note. I have no problem understanding written speech, though you seem to have a little problem trying to convey what you mean.
Wow, you know how to write multiple fingerings. Go you. Frankly, I don't care what you do with your music -- it's your music. If you think you're making innovations, bully for you. Unless you're making new techniques for making sounds -- striking the brass instrument with a flute's cleaning rod, taking a haircomb and pulling it across the harp strings, or taping a piece of foil on the end of the brass bell -- you're not doing anything groundbreaking and "outside of the box."
Beethoven and Co. wrote music that wasn't playable at that time period. The instrumentational issues and the construction of the instruments were what hindered the players. What you're doing is not new, thus it's not 'unplayable' by today's players. If you want an instrument built for you -- go for it. I doubt anyone else will, and to think that one will just be built for you (without your intervention) is extremely conceited. But hey! We could always use something else to give the kids to study about in their theory class.
Like someone else say about the sul G/A/C/E/whatever strings -- if you're looking for that much realism you'd be better off just calling in a player.