Guys, i own the same library, and yes it is a different sound, and it is good, but it is the smallest denominator. You can go looking for the holy grail, but the only real place to find it is within.
-
Take the solo cello example.... thats not just writing chops. Thats an awesome full, warm and expressivesound.
-
You worked with Thomas on Epic Horns and I bet those sales were through the roof!! Develop something like this or even better and it will simply be your biggest selling library to date.
Doesn't Thomas work for EW? If so, that could be a bit of a problem.
Lee Blaske
-
@dunk187 said:
Hi Rob,
So is are these samples from the East West Sampled Orchestra?
Also, how do the Guitarrian Strings sound in your opinions......
-B
Yes - TJ said 100% custom PLUS his own K2 (scripting). Sounds like that pushed it over the top for Thomas. Sounds like that is the case BUT - take one note of the cello solo and section demos - and Oh that tone [[:|]] [:D]
I have K2 update on its way - time to become a 'tweak head' [:)]
Rob
-
@dunk187 said:
Hi Rob,
So is are these samples from the East West Sampled Orchestra?
Also, how do the Guitarrian Strings sound in your opinions......
-B
Yes - TJ said 100% custom PLUS his own K2 (scripting). Sounds like that pushed it over the top for Thomas.
Rob
100% custum ? could you tell us more ? did he record himself an entire string orchestra ? that would cost him a lot of money
-
All I know is taken from this thread
http://northernsounds.com/forum/showthread.php?p=370140#post370140
Rob
-
I hear you Bruce. It does change the way we look at samples and just 'settling' for what is commercially available.
I am not a tweak head - but without this type of sound and control offered from the major developers I may just be motivated to become one.
I think the new VI is working towards this same objective - it is just (in Thomas' demos) the obvious absence of the typcial string sample 'sterile, brittle' sound that is so darn noticable in just about every demo available. I wish I could articulate what it is about this sound other than it is 'alive'.
Herb and co. - I can imagine you have watched this thread and the one on NS. Care to comment? Your impression of what Thomas has been able to achieve with the 'scripting', tone of his samples?
Many thanks.
Rob
-
Thinking about Herb, it must be difficult to keep a direction without any doubt,
I'm dreaming about an inteligent VSL package that would be light, a few gigs, let say less than 100 gig, that would combine real samples and some script.
Maintaining focused on their goal is the must difficult, there may be a lot of different mind and opinion inside the VSL team, I imagine the reunion at night that are long but so exciting. Those guys are developping our tools and providing us the key to achieve our musical intentions.
-
@magates said:
being selfish doesn't preclude being smart infact I think it implies he can make more money by having sole access to it.
If you read through the thread on NS that started this whole discussion, you'll find, in pieces throughout several of his posts, Thomas' rationale. You can view the thread here: http://www.northernsounds.com/forum/showthread.php?t=41116
He even addresses your feeling of his "selfishness," which is an assessment I don't personally echo. Still, give it a read before drawing conclusions.
-
I think he said it in the NS thread - he's a composer. He develops these tools to aid HIS composition. Becoming a developer is another venture altogether. He could certainly make money with it, if he re-oriented his career. But if he feeds his passion without having to do that excrutiating task, why do it?
As has been said, it's the passion within (with the aid of some surgical scripting skills) that we're all reacting to. The best VSL demos demonstrate what someone with passion can do with world class tools. Thomas is no different. Right now, I just wanna hear more what he can do.