Out of curiosity if this is of interest to anyone new to DP on M1, I just tested DP running VEP AU (DP Native) vs MAS (DP in Rosetta) using my full scoring template, with video attached.
1 - DP in Rosetta, VEP MAS:
- Pros: much lower Real time processing load/cpu usage, with the advantage of having multiple midi ports per instance.
- Cons: GUI is somewhat less responsive, or less smooth. Noticeable graphics anomalies when changing tabs.
2 - DP Native, VEP AU:
- Pros: DP runs very smoothly. GUI is quick and responsive. Excellent user experience by comparison.
- Cons: Higher real time processing/cpu load with VEP in AU format (DP's load without VEP instances is minimal). Only a single midi port per VEP instance.
So, those are our options. I am moving my scoring work to DP, and have an M1 Mac sitting here waiting, with scoring projects coming very soon. DP simply does not run well enough on Windows (my i7 at least), to be usable (GUI is way too slow). That leaves very few options.
We really need native compatibility for VEPro MAS ASAP. AU isn't a viable option for me and probably many other DP users. Note that DP was native compatible not long after the first M1s were released. It was native at least in November of 2020 - two years ago. MOTU may have been better positioned to make the transition quickly, but if they can do it, others could have as well. To be honest, copy protection is only for the benefit of the developer (again DP's simple system is a good example). It should never get in the way of customers or our work.
VSL - we are at the point even a rough timeframe for native compatibility is better than nothing. Many of us are having to consider costly alternatives to VSL and VEPro that, given the reality of our schedules, won't be temporary. That could mean lost sales for VSL in the future, and probably already has for customers new to VEPro and VSL.