@William said:

If you look at the HP link it goes to different models and options including more cores and graphics cards including a Tesla which is huge capacity.  Many different possibilities so it is complicated to figure out exact costs.

I have seen this !

But there is no secret, if the HP 12 core is costing 9900$, the expansion of the one you selected will cost the same or even more !

(in France we are saying : you cannot get the butter, it's milk and the farmer's wife  LOL)

http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/12/24/apples-new-mac-pro-a-better-value-than-the-sum-of-its-parts

Another take on the price comparison

That's an excellent article - very useful.  I was too lazy to do the actual price differences so it is great to see the point for point comparison.  Given the fact I am shooting 4K video also,  this is all becoming very alarming for my bank account.   [:O]

@julian said:

http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/12/24/apples-new-mac-pro-a-better-value-than-the-sum-of-its-parts

Another take on the price comparison

Very good article.

I have been looking for the price of the AMD FirePro D500 and D700, could not find them, it looks it's a special production for Apple

So they compare with AMD FirePro W9000 GPUs at $3,399.99 each, I don't know much about graphic cards but the price is very high for a graphic card !

The question is - for VSL sample use, is the 12-core really needed? 

I was pricing the 8-core 3 ghz with maxed out RAM and PCLe and none of the more expensive graphics cards,  and it is about $2,000 cheaper.  

One other thing - I just read that you can upgrade the CPU !  Is that true?  Many people seem uncertain about it.  

If so, then one could get a base Mac Pro and later - when some more funds come in - upgrade everything.

Logic uses multicores really well including when using solely VSL au's so 12 core would be fully utilised but other DAW's may be different.

The CPU is socketed and potentially can be upgraded.

http://www.macrumors.com/2013/12/27/new-mac-pro-confirmed-to-have-removable-cpu/

The flash storage is user updatable.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6061?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

Julian

8 core x 3 ghz = 24

12 core x 2.7 ghz = 32.4 

If you have a large orchestral template it's better to have a 12 core !

Upgrading a CPU is not a good idea you will pay a lot more !

@Cyril said:

8 core x 3 ghz = 24

12 core x 2.7 ghz = 32.4 

If you have a large orchestral template it's better to have a 12 core !

Upgrading a CPU is not a good idea you will pay a lot more !

well of course it is better to have 12 core.  It would be better to have a Cray Quantum Computer with a Multiverse Internet Connection. 

But I was talking about saving just a little money.  Never mind.  I will figure it out by myself.  A better way to work anyway.

@Cyril said:

8 core x 3 ghz = 24

12 core x 2.7 ghz = 32.4 

If you have a large orchestral template it's better to have a 12 core !

Upgrading a CPU is not a good idea you will pay a lot more !

well of course it is better to have 12 core.  It would be better to have a Cray Quantum Computer with a Multiverse Internet Connection. 

But I was talking about saving just a little money.  Never mind.  I will figure it out by myself.  A better way to work anyway.

I think there may definitely be a case for buying a 4 core or 6 core MacPro and in 18 months to 24 months swapping out the CPU. By then you may be able to get a 12 core with a higher clock speed than the current offerings for well under half the price. At the moment the 12 option looks to be particularly expensive for the performance increase - the processor upgrade alone is about the same as buying a complete new 6 core MacPro!

Unless you are urgently needing a new computer it may be worth waiting a couple of months then speaking with OWC http://eshop.macsales.com about the viability of future upgrades.

Julian

Thanks Julian that sounds like a good idea.   I am just leery of going for the "ultimate" system simply because it is advertised that way.

I remember hearing about the Synclavier.   It was the "ultimate" sampler.  It cost more than $100,000 and used a mainframe.

Today a small orchestral sound module that costs about $300 has more power. 

Though of course you can't wait around forever simply because technology is always improving.  

@julian said:

[ At the moment the 12 option looks to be particularly expensive for the performance increase - the processor upgrade alone is about the same as buying a complete new 6 core MacPro!

The high end processors will be always VERY expensive ! And Intel will always change something so you need to change the mother board !

A way to save money is :

Buy the Quad core = 2999 $

Buy the 12 core processor at ??? Newegg = 2749 $   (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116925)

Total = 5748 $

If you buy directly the 12 core it is 6999 $ 

So you save 6999 - 5748 = 1251 $

You have 12 GB of memory instead of 16 GB !

But you are taking risks, I will wait that other persons does the deal !

Unless Apple clearly specify you can upgrade your Macpro with processors bought elsewhere, if you have problems you need to return the Macpro with the original processor !

That's an interesting idea Cyril and I am thinking that may be the way to go.

teardown macPro

http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Mac+Pro+Late+2013+Teardown/20778

http://blog.macsales.com/22108-new-mac-pro-2013-teardown

confirms the CPU is sitting in a socket ... just the PCIe SSD appears to be proprietary and i wonder if the 1TB model contains 2 of those devices (completing the symmetry).

Hi CM,

Do you think MIR, VE, or VI Pro will be able to utilise the GPU resources for computational tasks at some point in the future (particularly as a plug-in).

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7603/mac-pro-review-late-2013

This comprehensivew review from Anandtech indicates future leaps forward will be more GPU than CPU based and that software that is able to address this will benefit most.

Julian

Hi Julian,

"Never say never!", ;-) ... but at least in case of MIR Pro I can assure you that we have no plans to switch to GPU-processing in the forseeable future.

Kind regards,

PS: ... although we in fact _had_ plans for that back in 2004! (I just looked it up.) ;-D

@cm said:

teardown macPro

http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Mac+Pro+Late+2013+Teardown/20778

http://blog.macsales.com/22108-new-mac-pro-2013-teardown

confirms the CPU is sitting in a socket ... just the PCIe SSD appears to be proprietary and i wonder if the 1TB model contains 2 of those devices (completing the symmetry).

So this would mean getting the maximum  PCLe memory right now. 

@cm said:

i wonder if the 1TB model contains 2 of those devices (completing the symmetry).

It's a single module.  The Mac Pro has used all of the available PCIe lanes.  So there is no possibility without a chipset change to allow for two SSD modules.

As usual I am abandoning Mac for cheaper PCs.  I recently found  a Dell XPS 8700 i7 4th generation computer that maxes out to 32 gb RAM and 4 cores. So get two of them and you have an 8 core 64 gb sample player.  And the cost?  $1,700.  Compare that to the Mac Pro model.

Julian-  I am thinking those figures in that article are very skewed.   They don't translate into real world use of CPU/RAM/processing in general.  Though on paper they are impressive.

Hi William

You cannot compare an I7 and a Xeon processor !

It's like comparing a Audi A6 to a Ferari !

Best

Cyril