183,421 users have contributed to 42,298 threads and 255,072 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 5 new thread(s), 13 new post(s) and 55 new user(s).
@PaulR said:
Guy - you once did an oboe demo which I personally thought was sublime and musically you are excellent old school. But these cellos don't sound good. Sorry - but there it is.
Finally some agreement. (Thanks)
At least, I don't feel all alone now, and will cancel my Ear Doctor appointment [:D]
Cheers,
Muziksculp
Hi Guy,
I'm sorry if I have spread this to one other forum. But... I'm just being honest. Hope that's not a problem these days.
Hopefully, you can improve these wonderful demo compositions from a production aspect to sound better.
You are a very talented composer, so I hope you accept, and respect my critique in a professional, and positive perspective.
All The Best,
Muziksculp
Paul, you've stated this in your previous post. Yeah, I got it, you think the SOUND is NOT good. Fine.
As for me, I know there are some things, I didn't do right, and will improve in the future cello demos. Is there anything more to say?
Guy (from the very, very old school) [:)]
PS But thanks for appreciating the writing.
I have to agree. This makes me not want to buy dimension strings. Special edition sounds better, in my opinion. Not sure if it's the instrument samples themselves or the mix, though...
Muziksculp provided some of his qualitative description of what he dislikes about the sound which somehow I guess tries to describe his perception. I think it'd be useful to ask the last two posters for what aspects of the sound they find "sounding bad". In all fairness and with all due respect, you'd be better off elevating the conversational level around such comment as otherwise some people, yours truly included, would tend to dismiss your comments rather easily for finding them trivially unfounded.
Guy is being made to produce a totally perfect sound with absolutely new instruments which have completely different acoustic characteristics on a regular basis, and it is stupid to attack these demos this way. I didn't even hear any problem since I liked the music so much. Maybe they need some EQ? So what? That is normal for new sounds. So you say "I'm not buying this library" blah-blah - what a bunch of crap.
The Dimension strings are the best thing that has yet been created for string samples, and to trash them here is disgusting to me.
I don't believe anyone is trashing them at all. A more accurate statement might be to say that with the bar of expectation set so high, some listeneres (like me) experienced a slight sense of disappointment that the cello sound in these demos (and certainly not Guy's obviously exceptional writing) didn't quite send shivers down their spine like the violin demo's did. A small thing, let's keep it in perspective.
@William said:
Guy is being made to produce a totally perfect sound with absolutely new instruments which have completely different acoustic characteristics on a regular basis, and it is stupid to attack these demos this way. I didn't even hear any problem since I liked the music so much. Maybe they need some EQ? So what? That is normal for new sounds. So you say "I'm not buying this library" blah-blah - what a bunch of crap.
The Dimension strings are the best thing that has yet been created for string samples, and to trash them here is disgusting to me.
My understanding is that Guy's demos are sponsored by VSL as a way to entice people like me to buy them. These particular demos sound thin and brittle and do not appeal to my ears at all, especially compared to previous products. Guy is a fine VSLman, so that makes me immediately suspect the samples. Or it could be that there are a lot of high notes for the cello, which aren't too enjoyable at the best of times. Or maybe, as you imply, it's that Guy is "being made to produce" demos with instruments he's not familiar with in a rushed way, which if true would be a silly approach to promotion. Whatever the reason -- why would anyone spend $1000 unless the demos blow them away? Listening to demos is literally the only way of evaluating libraries short of putting up a large sum of cash. So, no sale here. Not yet. Not even if a guy on the internet called William says it's "the best thing."
So I listened to them again. They are covered in reverb for a start. That's not a great way to go for me. That's just me though. They sound nasal. They are not sounding good exposed. Maybe they will sound different when they play in unison or whatever with the rest of the strings. I don't know.
They sound compressed as if they've been pushed together from either end. Not good. This is how they sound to ME.
Reference - Quested 2108 monitors and an Apogee Ensemble. Also through HD600s.
If that isn't a good enough reference then it's obviously my fucking ears that sound wrong. I don't want to look at my emails and find yet another post that disagrees with what I'm hearing. Rather, I would prefer to read what individuals think all on their own. Without any help.
That's my last word on it and Good Morning.
@William said:
Guy is being made to produce a totally perfect sound with absolutely new instruments which have completely different acoustic characteristics on a regular basis, and it is stupid to attack these demos this way. I didn't even hear any problem since I liked the music so much. Maybe they need some EQ? So what? That is normal for new sounds. So you say "I'm not buying this library" blah-blah - what a bunch of crap.
The Dimension strings are the best thing that has yet been created for string samples, and to trash them here is disgusting to me.
Chill down a bit and read through the thread again. In my most humble opinion, you are way too sensitive to any statement that could be considered criticism of VSL, just or not. I love the products from VSL, they are second to none, both in terms of sample quality and software. I took advantage of the early bird offer when the violins where released, so I've already downloaded and installed the cellos. I do think they sound great.
