Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

183,109 users have contributed to 42,275 threads and 254,983 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 2 new thread(s), 6 new post(s) and 37 new user(s).

  • I am puzzled by this thread. 

    Having used all the string libraries, Solo, Chamber, Orchestral, Appassionata and now Dimension, I recently did one of the most extreme examples in film music of legato strings - Vertigo's Scene d'amour.   This is the greatest string writing ever done for a movie.  And it features violin legato more than any other musical articulation. 

    Using the Dimension Violins on this was simply FABULOUS!  I absolutely loved the legato sound of the violins - it was molto espressivo and very connected, fluid,  beautiful, and the complexity of slightly mistimed transitions added to the realism to an uncanny degree.  And this is in comparison to ALL the other string libraries. 

    Also, I had programmed the Grieg "Last Spring" for the Appassionata/Orchestral strings, and then reprogrammed it recently for the Dimension violins.  They sound as good or better in legato. 

    True, Appassionata has some more extreme portamento, mainly because it is a huge sweeping fluid sound of  twenty players on one note. Also, if more samples/programming tweaks are added that is always good.   But I simply never heard any problem with legato, and in fact think it is amazingly beautiful in the Dimension violins. 


  • I understand the comparisons to live strings as mentioned by some, and I understand William's point with his work on Vertigo and I agree with it all. However, if I have a piece where there's an exposed single string part, be it a violin or cello melody, I feel the regular VSL legato can at times not be lyrical enough, and the portamentos are simply too much. We need variations in-between. So, as I've said so many times, I've created these variations with time-stretching. But I wish I didn't have to do this.


    Before VSL released their Dimension Strings, I thought to myself that they must be working on something very special and that it would include the most advanced legato programming on the market. I thought they would push the envelope beyond what all the other libraries were doing, given that that's always been the nature of their work. So of course I was very disappointed when they released Dimension Strings and it had the same old legato as all their other libraries have had for the past 10 years. What this says to me that they have a certain philosophy about how legato should be done (after all, they invented it!), and they are sticking to it. There's nothing wrong with that whatsoever -- and in fact it's commendable -- however in my opinion they're behind the curve in the legato department, and need to make advances with the technology to keep pace with other libraries are out there. I have all the other latest string libraries from other manufacturers, and I truly believe they fall short of VSL in every area except for legato. The quality control of the VSL libraries blows away everything else I've tried. Period. VSL doesn't released half-baked libraries with updates having to be made for glaring errors such as tuning, tonal and volume irregularities, sloppiness, etc. So, given how great VSL is in my opinion, and so many others, I would hope they would find a way to give us true variable legato transition times, that perhaps goes beyond the Band-Aid fix of time-stretching, and that is integrated into the Vienna Instruments Pro player for all their libraries, past and present (or more realistically, present and future).


  • Spot on ^


  • I haven't found any legato problems with DS. If anyone here would care to list a problematical note transition they have experienced within a certain patch (as opposed to general criticisms), I'd be happy to see if I can replicate it.


  • I haven't found any problematic transitions either, like I said, their quality-control is great.


  • Garylionelli

    What an eloquent and diplomatically worded post.   I could not have put it better, and I totally second your thoughts and senitments.   VSL's QC is second to none - I've honestly never found a bad transition or a tuning issue in any of their libraries (I have most of them).

    The issue is one of style, technical evolution and flexibility.  Legato programming is an area of the market that Vienna should own, and at the moment, it's not quite happening IMHO.   I fully accept that part of this comes down to personal taste, and that the small section size in Dim Strings also has a bearing, but I can't help feeling that if enough users are not wowed by the sound, then it might be worth looking at.

    Conquer, I think you many have misunderstood the message being conveyed.  Nobody is suggesting any transitions are broken.


  • Hi Trailerman, DG's statement "I don't want to hear holes between start and destination notes, and lumpy transitions" suggested to me that something was broken.


  • last edited
    last edited

     

    @DG said:

    I agree with that. In fact, I would go further. I think that the legatos need to be re-edited, because I don't think that they are of the same quality as the rest of VSL String libraries.
     

    Interesting, because for me the DS legatos work better than any other string collection we have produced.

    best

    Herb

    This is exactly what I thought about Dimension violins as soon as I heard the sound, which is why I don't understand this bizarre thread. 

    I will post some more music instead of blabbering. 


  • I'm very glad you removed your original comment William.  Don't know if that was a sudden rush of blood to the head, but it was just way off the mark.

    Most if not all of the people posting here with concerns, are absolute VSL devotees, not to mention a number who are involved in VSL's own QC system, so the suggestion that we/they are paid trolls is ridiculous.  Believe it or not, there are lost of furms where the debate and the motives are absolutely genuine.  I consider this to be one of them.

    Jules


  • I admire the civilised tone of this forum, and am glad that most participants have the grace to "agree to disagree" when conflicts of opinion arise. I feel the DS legatos are the equal of the legatos in all the other VSL string libraries (which I own), and while I respect other users' opinions on their usability, I am very surprised that anyone would suggest they are in some way below par. In my book, they are the best in the business and work superbly well.

    At the risk of straying slightly off topic, one thing I particularly like about VSL legato patches (and this applies to all the instrument families) is that if you sustain a note and rapidly reiterate a second note, you get a trill-like effect as the sustained note continually re-sounds. The same technique can be used to create very realistic grace notes. How many other orchestral libraries offer that particular legato facility?


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Trailerman said:

    I'm very glad you removed your original comment William.  Don't know if that was a sudden rush of blood to the head, but it was just way off the mark.

    Most if not all of the people posting here with concerns, are absolute VSL devotees, not to mention a number who are involved in VSL's own QC system, so the suggestion that we/they are paid trolls is ridiculous.  Believe it or not, there are lost of furms where the debate and the motives are absolutely genuine.  I consider this to be one of them.

    Jules


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Philippe BAYLAC said:

    Hi William,

    do you mean http://community.vsl.co.at/forums/t/34656.aspx ?

    Best.

    Phil.

    Yes, ha-ha, wrong link.  I now only respond with music.  No words.  However this went wrong so an explanation is needed. 

    By the way this Forum should only allow replies in music.  That way it will stay completely civilized.  Though it might get a little loud.  


  • F#!