Nail on the head.
-
Well, "Virtual Guitarist", this is exactly the same totally ridiculous argumentation I hear all the time when it comes to software piracy. You´re DEAD WRONG!
If you can´t afford anything, you can´t afford it. PERIOD!
There is absolutely no right on this world which legitimates you to act illegally only because you "can´t afford it". Come on, give me a break. This is outrageous!
It´s not only silly and dumb, it is totally unresponsible.
-
Not only that, but to have the nerve to come to a developer’s forum, while not having bought any of his products, and to proclaim that it is OK to steal his work because the money is lacking is outrageous. [[:|]]
It this was the prevailing attitude among people, VSL would cease to exist. Sometimes people forget that there is a whole team developing the products, musicians have to be hired, so there is a lot of cost involved.
If you don’t have the money to buy a car, you don’t buy one. You don’t go out to the carpark of a VW dealer and drive off with one of the cars, shouting: “I’ll pay for it when and if I have the money for it!”.
Ripping off a developer is not a necessity but a choice, and a very wrong one, because it turns you into a thief.
-
Software Piracy is theft.
Virtual Guitarist, how would you call a person, who steals a car in order to practice to get his drivers license?
You would call him a thief.
Even if he then buys a car.
This whole discussion is ludicrous and obsolete - Please, let´s just drop that thread and get back to work, before I loose my temper...
[8o|]
Marnix
-
To "Mister lawyer know-it-all" Jean:
In austrian and german jurisprudence, there is the notion of "Diebstahl geistigen Eigentums", which translates into "Theft of intellectual property", when it comes to copyright infringement.
Just to remind you, area of jurisdiction for all VSL contracts and license agreements is Vienna/Austria.
Sorry, if I am getting offensive when adressing you, but you weren´t exactly polite either...
Because I am working for VSL doesn´t automatically mean that I am stupid.
Marnix
-
Sorry, if I am getting offensive when adressing you, but you weren´t exactly polite either...
I am not aware I ever proclaimed that just because someone works at VSL, that must mean he is stupid. Are you confusing me with Evan Evans? [:D] (Sorry Evan, could not resist!)
Because I am working for VSL doesn´t automatically mean that I am stupid.
I certainly don’t want to offend anyone, apologies if you got that impression. Just setting the record straight with some insights from a professional. [[;)]]
-
Ok, all points taken... [[:|]]
Gawd, go and discuss with a lawyer...
I guess I was just p***d off with the topic along with Virtual Guitarists arguments and didn´t want to admit I used the wrong word. Just childish behaviour. [:O]ops:
You´re right, I´m wrong (and a "freizeitjurist" and a "wannabe-know-it-all").
Still, the analogy with the stolen car illustrates the way I feel about the whole issue, when somebody starts to tell me, he uses pirated/unlicensed software for "evaluation purposes" only.
Marnix
-
@marnix said:
Still, the analogy with the stolen car illustrates the way I feel about the whole issue, when somebody starts to tell me, he uses pirated/unlicensed software for "evaluation purposes" only.
Marnix
These days with so many good demos to listen to (for samples) there is really no excuse for "try before you buy"; unlike the old days, when one could spend ÂŁ400 on the recommendation of some magazine and find only one really useful sample on the whole disc.
However, in the past I have booked an appointment at Time and Space, turned up with a load of gear and tried all the stuff I was interested in buying. Unfortunately I bought far too much (according to my Bank Manager), but at least I knew that I would find a use for most of what I selected. I think that the "free" instruments that are given away with apps such as Giga are great in that it means that you know what you are buying.
DG
-
This threads kinda pointless. Of course VSL and many other libraries are available on p2p programs and you can't get it taken off of there. You could upload your own 3gb files full of garbage or whatever and name it VSL just to mess with piraters. Often when i'm d/l mp3's I d/l something and it turns out to be the wrong song, I hate that, imagine d/l 3gb to find out it's soemhting else! That would suck for them.
-
@GTBannah said:
So, Jean,
We have now got past the nuances and semantics of theft vs copyright infringment.
What is your view on theft/copyright infringment?
No more dancing, please .... [[;)]]
Lest anybody misunderstand my controversial post: I believe copyright infringment is a kind of theft. You are, in effect, misappropriating (usually we just call it stealing) someone else's intellectual property. It doesn't matter if the property is physical or immaterial. Just like sleeping on the job is employee theft, copyright infringement IS stealing.
Now . . . I must admit, I have at times borrowed software illegally. That is, I always pay for what I plan to use, otherwise I delete it. I know I shouldn't. But I just never feel comfortable spending chunks of cash on something I've never tried. For the advocate of demo tracks: try before you buy is very different. It's the difference between test driving a car before buying it and seeing someone else drive it on a closed track. The confidence level they afford is incomparable.
My original post here was intended to open a line of dialog with the developers as to how they might lessen the chance of intellectual property theft (or even "borrowing") in the future.
And in case anybody is wondering, I am a full paying customer of VSL and all other sample libraries I own. You should be too.
~Chris
-
To Dietz:
I disagree with you, because exactly like Galleddrim says, as a student one can't afford all the samples/software you need to be operatable, so HOW CAN ONE LEARN TO WORK WITH THOSE SAMPLES AND SOFTWARE???
To be honest (héhé I'm the first one to admit!!! yes I'm guilty), as a student composition, I HAVE used libraries which I DID NOT own.
Let me make a fast calculation: to be able to work with samples you need a lot of stuff: PC or Mac (at least 1200 euro to have something useable), software sequencer (i.e. Logic: 1000 euro), software sampler (i.e. gigastudio: 600 euro), good sound card (400 euro, and that's not too much), samples... (well that's difficult, but take i.e. a simple tool like Garritan Personal Orchestra, just for orchestral sounds, it costs you 250 euro, or take i.e. library's from Miroslav or Dan Dean or Kirk Hunter, they cost you at least 500 to 1000 euro), than add a masterkeyboard (to have something reasonably good, it will cost you again between 500 and 1000 euro), eventually a controller (around 200 euro?).
Well sum it all up and you have a bill between 4000 and 5000 euro. And admit it guys, to have a PROFESSIONAL setup you must double or triple the amount... Which student or even good amateur can afford that???
You know, I still didn't invest (although I was planning to do it this summer) in VSL, just because of the price. And I know, compared to all the work programmers and producers of software and sample creating companies, it's NOT expensive i.m.o. (we already discussed this before: 3200 euro for a complete orchestra is NOT EXPENSIVE!!!). But that's just not the point in this discussion. All together it IS a great deal of money to invest, and certainly for students and good amateurs, who in fact mostly even don't use it in productions to earn money from.
I completely agree to the fact, that once you use it in productions, and you start to earn money, you have NO EXCUSE AT ALL but to have licenses of everything you use for your production.
Well that's just some of my thoughts...
PS Look, who do I have to tip about those links? Because in fact, it's soooo easy to find them...
Oh come on!
I'm 23, I'm certainly not particulary wealthy and I am not guaranteed an income from composing, but I still went to see the bank manager and got a loan out to get VSL and the computers and software required to run it, because it is something that I really want to make a career out of. It was an investment I guess, I don't regret it.... Now its down to me to make the money back.
-
Oh come on!
I'm 23, I'm certainly not particulary wealthy and I am not guaranteed an income from composing, but I still went to see the bank manager and got a loan out to get VSL and the computers and software required to run it, because it is something that I really want to make a career out of. It was an investment I guess, I don't regret it.... Now its down to me to make the money back.
Yes, I had to take out a loan to buy a violin and bow; more expensive than the whole of the VSL libraries put together [[:|]] If you want to be a professional at anything, then you have to be prepared to buy the correct tools for the job, not steal them [H]
DG
-
Hmm......i always thought pointless threads (as some of you say) warranted no replies.This thread seems to have done quite well with regard to individual's responses.What is interesting as the author of this post i have not seen any pirated VSL for EXS format,it is all GIGA versions.Whether this is because GIGA is simply more popular or EXS and Logic harder to crack remains to be seen.
-
Paw.
I dont think its a case of this being a 'pointless thread'.
I think the problems arose with your initial 'gosh, piracy must be a real problem for you software developers' post (a little like suggesting that being diagnosed with cancer may spoil an otherwise good lunch) which somewhat (perhaps unintentionally) downplayed the seriousness of this issue.
And some of the other responses that, to varying degree's, implied that in some instances using kracked software could be justified.
As a user paying thousands of dollars for software I find it extremely annoying that others may be utilising this without paying...and since they dont have this overhead they can easily undercut composers who do pay for the software.
And I can only imagine how this must affect the developers...
-
@zigzag said:
Paw.
I dont think its a case of this being a 'pointless thread'.
I think the problems arose with your initial 'gosh, piracy must be a real problem for you software developers' post (a little like suggesting that being diagnosed with cancer may spoil an otherwise good lunch) which somewhat (perhaps unintentionally) downplayed the seriousness of this issue.
And some of the other responses that, to varying degree's, implied that in some instances using kracked software could be justified.
As a user paying thousands of dollars for software I find it extremely annoying that others may be utilising this without paying...and since they dont have this overhead they can easily undercut composers who do pay for the software.
And I can only imagine how this must affect the developers...
Hey, I like your cancer analogy. Really captures the initial impression. In any case, my comments were not meant to justify piracy (or even my previous "borrowing," though I never even tried to "borrow" VSL) but to make suggestions as to how such illigitimate use might be curtailed by developers. As a full paying customer, I would certainly want VSL to reap all possible financial benefit from their product.
However, as a composer, I am not concerned about being undercut by pirates. I think it would be a stupid risk (ethics aside) for them to try to make money with a pirated product of this nature. Only an idiot or a gambler would try it.
~Chris
-
@PolarBear said:
The gambling industry is one of the most and always successful business in and all over the world...
That is only too true. But the analogy holds up, don't you think? Who makes the money most of the time? The gambling addict or the casino?
~Chris
-
First of all, just because software is available via P2P does not scientifically prove that anyone is using the software illegally. Usage and copyright are two different legal pursuits.
As far as I'm concerned, VSL has done an excellent job thwarting illegal "use". Both via their excellent usage agreement, and via their usage protection mechanisms.
No one can stop copying. In fact copying is legal until you determine the intent of the copying. Under US Law, copying is allowed for educational purposes. There is no exception to that rule. It is what fuels progress according to our constitution. It could never be revoked as it's built-in to how this country exists fundamentally.
So I cannot speak fo rother countries, but here, if you are not profiting from the copied material, or using it illegally, than you are allowed to copy.
However, there is the implication that once you place an original on a P2P network that it will be copied, with the foreseeability of "illegal use". Under that pretext, one can prosecute offenders. Especially the "host". Because P2P has a built-in implication that NOT everyone is using copies for educational purposes.
The most common and rampant form of copying is called BACKUP. The reason it's legal is becuase the intent of use doesn't even exist. It is only there to replace an original should the original become damaged. You NEVER use your backup. There is no intended use, not even for educational purposes.
So as you can see, it's important to differentiate between "copying" and "intended use". You can only prosecute for around 40%-90% of actual copying/usage activity. And even then you need evidence to effecetively prosecute, let alone to get a judge to allow you to even have a trial (you can't just go prosecuting everybody unless you have evidence).
Just thought I'd add that food for thought.
Evan Evans
