Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

194,600 users have contributed to 42,924 threads and 257,981 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 2 new thread(s), 8 new post(s) and 118 new user(s).

  • This is so incredibly arrogant I had to comment, though I would prefer this thread lapse into its deserved obscurity. You are too busy and important and in-demand to spend any time on your music?

    I hope that never happens to me.

    o.K., I am out of here, as this hypocritical thread, by hypocritical people who are making money off of music done with VSL and then trashing it, has started to BORE me... go on with your recitations of why you are important and the not-even-released-yet string library is not good enough for you... [8-)]

  • last edited
    last edited

    @William said:

    This is so incredibly arrogant I had to comment, though I would prefer this thread lapse into its deserved obscurity. You are too busy and important and in-demand to spend any time on your music?


    This has nothiing to do with arrogance: it's his job. As for many, many of us who are using VSL's products.

    J.

  • I guess that what we learn from all this is that everyone has a different workflow. I cannot imagine ever plonking down chords on a "string" patch, any more than I would want a woodwind patch or brass patch (although I know people who do use the latter...!). For me I always think in at least 5 voices for the string section (assuming that it is a conventional setup), so a string patch wouldn't save me any time at all in programming. I also think that AS is probably the worst choice of Collection for a busked string section, as it is far to fat and woolly (from what I've heard) to be of much use.

    I think that all I'm trying to say is that we all have different ways of working that suit us, and whilst I can see uses for a general string patch (check out Atmosphere for pads), it doesn't make sense to me to have one for much of AS.

    DG

  • So this "free Appassionata violin" preview I keep reading about -- was that a special promotion for Pro Edition VSL owners? Or would I be eligible once I finish purchasing the full extended VI cube?

    Just asking,
    Peter

  • The one thing that concerned me was the scarcity of articulations for the basses... will these ever be increased?
    One of the things I've always admired in VSL is the thoroughness of the sampling - I was a bit surprised when I saw that the basses don't even have a performance legato patch! [:O]

  • I think it is a cost and time issue related to the initial reason behind the samples.

    The history of the Appassionata Strings is that they were originally a single session to provide additional violin samples as a "present" to existing VSL users of certain products. Requests were asked for and out of this the violin samples emerged.

    It was pretty obvious from the request responses that there was a wish for a certain type of sound and later these requests this spilled over into the other string groupings. I guess VSL responded to this and thought it a good idea to provide this requested sound across the whole string section as an extra library.

    This may be why there aren't the depth of articulations that exist in the main string library which makes sense from both a cost and duplication of product reason.

    Julian

  • last edited
    last edited

    @William said:

    This is so incredibly arrogant I had to comment, though I would prefer this thread lapse into its deserved obscurity. You are too busy and important and in-demand to spend any time on your music?

    I hope that never happens to me.

    o.K., I am out of here, as this hypocritical thread, by hypocritical people who are making money off of music done with VSL and then trashing it, has started to BORE me... go on with your recitations of why you are important and the not-even-released-yet string library is not good enough for you... [8-)]


    Wow...I'm just about speechless. Excuse me? You want to talk about arrogant? Who are you to judge my workflow? Do you hear me bashing your workflow?
    I posted because some didn't seem to understand why a full range would be neccessary. I tried to explain it's importance to me. I didn't post so I would irritate the incredible rightousness known herein as "William".

    And my post is just so damn offensive that it made you pull your hair out and you had come back and personally bash me because..... Grow up. Learn some manners. Take an anger mangement class.

    Maybe you should stop attacking others when you don't agree (I seem to recall that you have a long history of doing this in these forums) Better yet, if it pisses you off, don't post. If you can't be civil, don't post. Otherwise you're the one that comes off as arrogant and obnoxious.

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    you will get an armed response


    hahaha

    I'm going to steal that line.

  • (but I haven't tried tha A. strings and can't contribute anything intelligent to this thread)

  • Dear Forum Members,

    while it is always interesting to see heated discussions going on, I ask everybody to stick to a friendly and companionable tone. After all, we're talking about music here, so there's no need to be at feud with each other.

    [:)]

    Thanks a lot!

    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • ... and then there's that Dietmar. Always coming in and whining about "let's be nice to each other"...

    Nasty piece of work.

    [[:|]]

  • Group hug.