Thank you Mystr Tiger. Yes, I have run into that before, so I definitely made sure to try assigning something to the input. I remain baffled.

Running Vienna Instruments as standalone is better than nothing, but a PITA, since I can only run one instance at a time. Building arrangements by sequencing one part at a time, then printing audio before going to the next part is making me crazy!

I received notice that Ilio is having a sale til Feb 15 - I'm wondering if I should invest further in these products. They sound so good, but I'm stuck trying to get this to work effectively in Pro Tools.

Is there a moderator in the house who could shed some light?

Hello charlzj,

there is no RTAS version available yet, although I´d love to tell you something different.

Honestly, the best way to use the Vienna Instruments in your setup is to get a slave computer for your samples. This way you will establish a reliable workflow that also allows you to use orchestral templates that you can load on a seperate computer.

Hope that helps.

Best regards,

Paul

@charlzj said:

FWIW, Here's my experience using Vienna Instruments with Pro Tools so far. The Fxpansion vst to rtas adaptor (which works great with other VST instruments) sees the Vienna Instrument, but is unable to convert it. So at this point I am forced to use the Vienna Instrument in standalone mode.

I was able to use VSI with Fxpansion VST to RTAS with no problem. It wrapped the plug with no problems. This was with Fx VST to RTAS version 1.6 (for DAE 6.9) I would asume that it should work the same with Fx VST to RTAS version 2.0 for DAE 7.X.

Hi,

it´s true that you can open the Vienna Instruments in a wrapper, and depending on your machine you can open up to 3-5 instances, which is simply not enough in our opinion....

Best,

Paul

Thanks to all who have responded!

I finally managed to get the VST wrapper to convert VSI to RTAS, and it works... sort of. Some annoying stuck note and dropped note bugginess, weird velocity response anomolies, erroneous release sample triggering, crashing,etc. And that's with only 2 or 3 instatiations.

I know, I should buy a second computer, run VSI on a different platform than Pro Tools... I wasn't counting on the additional expense, hassle, and complexity of another computer, interface, rewiring and re-configuring my rack, adding and learning a second software platform program, etc, etc. Yikes!! '[[:|]]' I'm not doing big film cues here, just string parts on pop records.

Additional non-RTAS-related problems (I will also post these to another, more relevant thread):

REPEATED disappearance of licenses. I've repaired disk permissions, re-installed licenses, dragged the plug-in out of and back into my VST plug-in folder, shutdown and restarted more times than I can count.

Save button is grayed out, so I can't save anything. And repairing disk permissions did not fix the problem.

Love the sounds, but the software is making me lose what little hair I have left... '[*-)]'

Thanks to user Simon Ravn, I can save now. Deleting the "Vienna Instruments Custom Data" folder and creating a new one fixed that problem.

You know, this is finally just irresponsible of VSL. I jumped in as some of you apparently did also, and bought the full VSL Instruments Strings I and II before the price-hike because there was a reference somewhere (Ilio?) that you could run it with PT. And as it turns out you can either run it as a VST instrument with a wrapper--and the performance is inadequate--or you can run it as a stand-alone and you can then use 1 instance of it at a time. This takes me back to the 1970's and the first Synclavier with mono sampling.

Ridiculous. I think there needs to be more than a moderator simply contributing a helpless shrug. Either VSL needs to say clearly in their promotional literature that the VSL Instruments don't work within ProTools and therefore you can only use a single instance of the plug as a stand-alone or they need to fix the problem. I will also grouse, while I'm at it, that for several years now this has been a problem with most of the the German companies--NI notoriously--the Mac versions are add-ons and the implementation is shaky. Years after Reaktor was first introduced it's still performs badly in ProTools. I hope VSL intends to do better than that.

Aren't some people running several instances of standalone by running copies of the standalone version?

You can also pick up Plogue Bidule cheaply (plug-in host program), instantiate as many VST VIs as you like, connect Bidule to PT via rewire, and voilà. Haven't done this extensively, but I've tried it, and it appears to work very well.

PL

If multiple Vienna Instrument instances can be run in stand-alone mode, I would like to know how... I could only open one.

I have managed to run multiple instances in ReWire via Plogue Bidule. But it's a bit complicated, and somewhat buggy. If anyone is interested, I can post the exact procedure. Someone else had previously posted a how-to, but I found that I had to do it a little differently in order to make it work.

drpgleeson, I'm with you. And I too have experienced problems with poor Mac versions of other instruments. An especially egregious example for me: EastWest Symphonic Gold Orch library, bundled with Kompakt. The Mac version is obviously a bastard stepchild, extremely buggy and crashy. And before I bought it, I actually called and specifically asked them if there were any Mac/PT issues and was assured that it was fine. Let me assure you it is not...

Sorry, I digress; this thread is about Vienna...

So how about it, Vienna - You've said you ran into problems making an RTAS vesion. So does that mean you're throwing in the RTAS towel, or are you still trying to make it happen?

welcome drpgleeson,

@Another User said:

Either VSL needs to say clearly in their promotional literature that the VSL Instruments don't work within ProTools

it says clearly on each product page *AU, VST, stand-alone*, RTAS is not mentioned there and if PT does not support AU or VST clearly some kind of other solution is needed - which one depends also on your specific setup.

on the other hand our devopers worked long and hard on a _usable_ RTAS version, which turned up to be more tricky than initially thought. i'd ask you to lurk around in several forums if and how reliable and performant various RTAS implementations run, always please considering the ratio of content/amount needed to be streamed.

as you know RTAS is not an open implementation like VST or AU and - simplified speaking - works in two modes: hardware and software. both are proprietary and since it looks like digidesign likes to push their own sampler, further conclusions should be obvious.

christian

ps: if you like to betatest RTAS versions you're welcome, let us know ...

CM - you should have been a politician! Nicely dodged!! '[[;)]]'

To quote myself,
"You've said you ran into problems making an RTAS vesion. So does that mean you're throwing in the RTAS towel, or are you still trying to make it happen?"

@Another User said:

"if you like to beta test RTAS versions you're welcome, let us know ..."

That would imply that the quest is ongoing after all.

yes/no '[*-)]:'


...Well, OK, I'll bite... I will beta test.

One more question - If I were to buy a slave computer to run VIs, can you please tell me the recommended platform (Mac or PC, and host program) that is best? Most efficient, bug-free, etc?

I'll beta test as well.

Hi charlzj,

the Vienna instruments run stable on both platforms, Mac and PC.
On a Slave Mac you use a host like Plogue Bidule or RAX to host the VIs, you can make use of 2.7 GB of RAM in the host.
On a Slave PC, if your are using a host like Forte (that is Large Memory Aware), you can also use up to 3 GB of RAM.

So it´s really a matter of taste.... [;)]

Best,

Paul

Thanks, Paul - I'm really a Mac guy, so I would probably lean towards that. Anybody out there feel like Forte (PC) is more adventageous than Plogue Bidule or RAX (Mac) as a host?

I will go hunt down info on the guys who use Mac Minis as slaves - I know that's a popular solution, but I don't know all the gory details as to what host they use, and how they route audio into their ProTools gear, and how they deal with digital sync...

BTW, I can't seem to get your forum search engine to work... Is there by any chance a compatibilty issue with Mac Safari?

I don´t get the Search function to work right now either, tried Safari and Firefox.... sorry for that.

But here´s the thread you will want to read for Mac Minis:
http://community.vsl.co.at/viewtopic.php?t=9302

Best,

Paul

Ah, I see in the "Mac Mini's as VSL Farms" thread some great detailed info from user Jerome. That is a serious setup!

CM and Paul,

Re RTAS beta-testing, any interest in my beta-testing RTAS specifically as it applies to Digital Performer running in DAE mode? (I'm a very experienced DP and PT user - my orchestral stuff is done almost entirely in DP using a PT Accel 3 system).

Don't know if that's of interest (it certainly is to me!{(:=)}), but I'd be happy to do it.

Peter

Clarification -- right now I'm using VI in on a slave Mac Pro. Believe it or not, right now I'm using my G5 dual 2.5 GHz as my master machine (so I can keep using my PT Accel 3 system), and I'm hosting VI on my Mac Pro. But I'd love to be able to host VI directly in DP under DAE.

@Another User said:

I don´t get the Search function to work right now either, tried Safari and Firefox

just as a sidenote: this has nothing to do with any browser - the search function is simply ... crap ... printing out the code gives you a listing about 10 m long, it regulary struggles down the server running horrible queries and finally runs into a timeout.
we are working on an alternative solution already
christian