vagn, i didn't discuss it with our devolopers in depth, but from what i can tell: whichever way you look at it, it simply lacks performance.
one reason might to be found highly probable in the fact that protools is a recording application at first and not a sequencer, another one is the huge amount of samples to be loaded and the short preload.
additionally the nature of RTAS is to process everything in the CPU and not in the PT hardware and the system load for the GUI (a general problem with OS X PPC) does it's own ...
i'd like to add this is not a technically 100% accurate statement but basically hits the nail. several aproaches to avoid at least some of these limitations are under investigation.
christian
one reason might to be found highly probable in the fact that protools is a recording application at first and not a sequencer, another one is the huge amount of samples to be loaded and the short preload.
additionally the nature of RTAS is to process everything in the CPU and not in the PT hardware and the system load for the GUI (a general problem with OS X PPC) does it's own ...
i'd like to add this is not a technically 100% accurate statement but basically hits the nail. several aproaches to avoid at least some of these limitations are under investigation.
christian
and remember: only a CRAY can run an endless loop in just three seconds.