Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

194,027 users have contributed to 42,906 threads and 257,900 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 4 new thread(s), 19 new post(s) and 105 new user(s).

  1. Home
  2. Sample Libraries
  3. Vienna Instruments Libraries
  4. Multiple identical instances and RAM

  • Multiple identical instances and RAM

    D
    D
    I am using VI via FX-teleport over a network.

    I find that if I load the VI-14 VSL Preset Level 2, my memory usage goes up to about 700Mb. However, if I load the identical Preset into another instance my memory usage goes up to 1400Mb. I thought that the samples weren't loaded twice?
    Please could other people check this for me, so that I can see whether it is a VI problem or an FX-Teleport problem.

    DG
  • JBacalJ
    JBacalJ
    DG--

    I could be wrong, but I believe that on the PC instances do NOT share memory yet. I think they are working on this.

    Best,
    Jay
  • D
    D
    last edited
    last edited

    @JBacal said:

    DG--

    I could be wrong, but I believe that on the PC instances do NOT share memory yet. I think they are working on this. I also believe that they DO share memory on the Mac.

    Best,
    Jay

    Blimey, that's almost two reasons to consider buying buy a Mac now [:D] I suppose that I've just got used to loading up as many tracks in GS3 as I like with the same samples on each.

    Thanks Jay [:(]

    DG
  • PaulP
    VSL Team
    PaulP
    Hi,

    shared memory doesn´t work on a Mac either, and there´s a reason for this: When you use "Optimize RAM" and have the same patches loaded in another VI, that plays different notes, there would be a severe conflict....

    Best, Paul
    Paul Kopf Product Manager VSL
  • C
    C
    Hi Paul. Would be nice if this in some way was fixed. I was planning on loading two similar instances for 1st and 2nd violin.
  • D
    D
    last edited
    last edited

    @Paul said:

    Hi,

    shared memory doesn´t work on a Mac either, and there´s a reason for this: When you use "Optimize RAM" and have the same patches loaded in another VI, that plays different notes, there would be a severe conflict....

    Best, Paul

    But I don't want to optimise RAM, I just want to load the samples and leave them [:'(]

    Well at least I won't have to consider buying a Mac [:)]

    DG
  • C
    C
    last edited
    last edited

    @Paul said:

    Hi,

    shared memory doesn´t work on a Mac either, and there´s a reason for this: When you use "Optimize RAM" and have the same patches loaded in another VI, that plays different notes, there would be a severe conflict....

    Best, Paul

    But I don't want to optimise RAM, I just want to load the samples and leave them [:'(]

    DG

    Agreed. Just program it so if someone actually does you memory optimize its just tough luck for them, they loose the samples in both instances.
  • PaulP
    VSL Team
    PaulP
    Please don´t worry, I´m just stating how it is right now. Let´s see what the future brings.
    Paul Kopf Product Manager VSL
  • C
    C
    Hey were not worried [:)]

    Just giving you user feedback [H]