Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

192,787 users have contributed to 42,853 threads and 257,642 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 2 new thread(s), 13 new post(s) and 175 new user(s).

  • Actually, putting an MP3 here is something I also would like to know how to do.


    I have some cool helicopter sounds... [:P]

  • So now that all are so relieved that everything is back to music, as opposed to sarcasm...

    WHAT THE HELL WAS THE POINT OF THIS THREAD?

    (That's no sarcasm by the way. A simple question.)

    Thor and his obedient disciple here have made no points whatsoever. The room sound is bad, the room sound is o.k. VSL is bad, VSL is good. EWQLSO is better, EWQLSO is not better -----

    what is your point? You have said absolutely nothing with many, many words. Say something meaningful. That is a simple, direct challenge for you. Say something that means something about music, samples, etc. Don't waffle, don't bullshit, just say something that has something which linguists call DENOTATION. Or SENTIENCE. Or THOUGHT PROCESSES...

  • last edited
    last edited

    @dpcon said:

    There were rare exceptions like the Vienna oboe which everyone complained about

    NOOOO..... I do love the Viennese oboe! [:D] (at least not everyone then hehe [H] )

  • Well, there you go and I wouldn't disagree. Nothing wrong with the instrument or the samples and I understand you loving it. My main point was that VSL responds to it's customers when there's even a percieved problem or even just an earnest request. The fact that there was no French Oboe which many are used to was the issue - not the quality of the samples etc.

  • last edited
    last edited

    @William said:



    WHAT THE HELL WAS THE POINT OF THIS THREAD?


    Thor and his obedient disciple here have made no points whatsoever. The room sound is bad, the room sound is o.k. VSL is bad, VSL is good. EWQLSO is better, EWQLSO is not better -----

    what is your point? You have said absolutely nothing with many, many words. Say something meaningful. That is a simple, direct challenge for you. Say something that means something about music, samples, etc. Don't waffle, don't bullshit, just say something that has something which linguists call DENOTATION. Or SENTIENCE. Or THOUGHT PROCESSES...



    BLACK or WHITE ! Well. to me everything is a bit more complex than that, sorry if that's too complicated for you.
    I'll try to be more ONE AND ONLY OPINION WRITTEN IN CAPITAL LETTERS...ok ?

    btw, where is the post where I say EWQLSO is better ....? ...hm...where do I say that VSL (as a whole) is bad ?? ...

    I haven't seen anything that has something which linguists call DENOTATION. Or SENTIENCE. Or THOUGHT PROCESSES...coming from you Sir William...

    [:D]

  • last edited
    last edited

    @William said:

    what is your point?


    I don't know if I'm about to go off-topic, but my point of view is that VSL guys came out with a product clearly conceived to replace, at least in most cases, a real orchestra.

    I watched again the Universal Mode video: Synful is too limited for a comparison. For now, apart from VSL there are no other digital orchestras playable in real-time.

    Honestly speaking, it doesn't seem an insignificant innovation...

  • Just one comment regarding one poster's so delicate style...cough! cough!

    I think we all have the right to occasionally loose it and get out of line. I have done so. But when someone constantly harasses the same people post after post that is carrying it too far! People have the right to their own opinion on this forum. Say what you have to say but no need to get arrogant! Please respect that!

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Guy said:

    Say what you have to say but no need to get arrogant!


    Why not?

    [6]

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Guy said:

    Say what you have to say but no need to get arrogant!


    Why not?

    [6]

    ??

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Guy said:

    Say what you have to say but no need to get arrogant!


    Why not?

    [6]

    Thanks for helping PaulR...

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Guy said:

    Say what you have to say but no need to get arrogant!


    Why not?

    [6]

    Thanks for helping PaulR...

    Guy - I just don't think it's necessary to keep going over old ground - over and over and over and over again.

    And btw - I've seen many posts from people who say they want to post an MP3 example of this or that sound or piece of music. 99% of the time it's usually OK at best - but generally a disappointment at worst. MP3 examples don't prove anything with regard to what's been posted on this thread.

  • But Paul! I'm the 1% exception.... [H]


    Pretty arrogant, ain't I?

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Guy said:

    But Paul! I'm the 1% exception.... [H]
    Pretty arrogant, ain't I?


    Not at all my dear fellow.

    Jeez, I can't even remember what this thread is about and I sure ain't reading through it again.

    I got sent a piece from a friend of mine in France - oh - about 4 weeks or so ago. Real orchestra recording.

    Believe me, this was some serious sounding music. Honestly, MP3's of sampled material AFAIC - CAN impress me insomuch as the programming. I've heard just about every John Williams clone going since sample libraries were invented for instance. John Williams impresses me - but JW soundalikes don't. Their programming does - but that's another thing altogether.

    You will now, because you are top 1% - seriously need to come out with something extra special now old chap. If it comes out sounding like HZ - I may put out a contract on you.

    [:P] [:D]

  • Guy: Who died and made you Queen of the Forum? I'll write anything I feel like. Especially if it irritates you. End of that part of discussion.

    Thor: Well, I notice yet again - absolutely nothing of substance. And yet I asked what was your point. You answered with more nothingness. Apparently, I must assume your point is a very modern one: possibly Deconstructionist, in that nothing - no text, no statement, no possible point of view - means anything in reality. This is only an assumption of course. Based upon your very Deconstructed writings.

    Paul: yes, the JW clones are extremely disturbing and in fact should probably be subjected to intense de-programming, involving regular electroshock therapy reducing them to drooling wrecks whose only mental activity consists of repeating the statement over and over again:

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

  • last edited
    last edited

    @William said:

    Guy: Who died and made you Queen of the Forum? I'll write anything I feel like. Especially if it irritates you. End of that part of discussion.



    You mean you didn't hear? Queen Shebah died last night, and not having a daughter I am now the new Queen!

  • last edited
    last edited

    @William said:

    Guy: Who died and made you Queen of the Forum? I'll write anything I feel like. Especially if it irritates you. End of that part of discussion.

    Thor: Well, I notice yet again - absolutely nothing of substance. And yet I asked what was your point. You answered with more nothingness. Apparently, I must assume your point is a very modern one: possibly Deconstructionist, in that nothing - no text, no statement, no possible point of view - means anything in reality. This is only an assumption of course. Based upon your very Deconstructed writings.

    Paul: yes, the JW clones are extremely disturbing and in fact should probably be subjected to intense de-programming, involving regular electroshock therapy reducing them to drooling wrecks whose only mental activity consists of repeating the statement over and over again:

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."

    "I will stop copying John Williams' use of the II chord with a raised third over a tonic pedal point especially if it involves spiccato violins."



    Huh ??? You shouldn't talk about JW...Bernard Hermann would be more appropriate for you...

    Duh Dee Duh Duh ....
    Duh Dee Duh Duh ....
    Duh Dee Duh Duh ....
    Duh Dee Duh Duh ....
    Duh Dee Duh Duh ....
    Duh Dee Duh Duh ....
    Duh Dee Duh Duh ....
    Duh Dee Duh Duh ....

    not sure if you will get the joke...

    and here comes more nothing from me..Yipeee...

    With people like you in this forum why would I make a point ?? Nothing is all that is needed...hehe

    See ya, wouldn't wanna be ya...

    [:D]

  • Brrrrrrrrrrrrr! It's freeeeeeeeezing in this thread!

    Even my computer freezes when I go to this thread!
    [:O]ops:

    The Queen is dead! Long lives the Queen!!!!!

    Queen Guy
    (Queen of the forum)

  • Thor: After asking repeatedly, it is obvious -

    Nothing is all you're capable of. You have no point, no ideas, no music. Why do I bother with you?

    I have no idea... I am out of here. Go try to impress other people with your non-existent bullshit posts.

    If you posted some music, then I would take you seriously. Even if it was bad, which I respect totally. I do bad music, and totally respect other bad composers. Because they have the guts to put it out there for jerks to rip their guts out with. But you don't even do that, so you are not worthy of further comment. You are HOT AIR. Until you show what you're capable of, goodbye HOT AIR.

  • You desperately want Thor to put an mp3 so you could say: "That sounds like shit!!!!!!" And get the last word. Isn't that what you want?

    Guy
    Queen of the forum

  • Not at all, Guy.

    I simply don't trust any human, until I have heard what music he writes.