@charl said:
I have not read a single argument from the VSL team that will specifically comment on this issue (which is the core question), or provide a logical, convincing & acceptable argument that will justifie their decision.
Quite frankly I'm not surprised of this because I don't see how their position is defendable.
Well, I *looks* to me like -- I said it *looks*[:)], so maybe it's all diffrent -- that the idea is to force current users to buy both versions of the product :
To get the VIP price you have to buy the standard edition first. So you'll end up buying both.
If you want to just use the new interface (like me), you have to get both products, too, because, once you have payed full price for samples you already own (more or less), you want to take advantage of the products (your investment) you already have, so you will get the extended version for less money (VIP price). So, the strategy *seems* to be to sell both versions to current users.
New users have the advantage that they do not need to invest too much in the beginning, they still have the choice of upgrading and choosing a "lighter" version.
If this is the idea, I'm afraid that strategy won't work at least for me, because I can't afford the whole upgrade-package, so I'll just go on working the way I did before. If there *would be* another upgrade path, just for the samples I own (more or less), I'd take this seriously into consideration.
Do remember that Standard is not the same as Pro Ed. You get some Horizon content in Standard and not all of Pro Ed, so what you could do is upgrade bit by bit. That way you will always have what you already have to use and you will get the new interface and extra articulations and possibly new instruments on the bits that you choose to upgrade.
DG