It is indeed very important that everyone understand that there is some new sampled material in the VIs.
I also agree that the new interface must have a price.
None of these arguments will however logically justifie the 'one single price' on standart S-cube applied for new and VIP users.
The VIP 'privilège' should be logically reflected at both steps of access to the S-Cube. Standard AND Extended. This is not the case.
VIP users are forced to buy into the extended versions if they want their money's worth. Not new users. This is pretty lame I think and does not match the VSL pricing philosophy.
I have not read a single argument from the VSL team that will specifically comment on this issue (which is the core question), or provide a logical, convincing & acceptable argument that will justifie their decision.
Quite frankly I'm not surprised of this because I don't see how their position is defendable.
I also agree that the new interface must have a price.
None of these arguments will however logically justifie the 'one single price' on standart S-cube applied for new and VIP users.
The VIP 'privilège' should be logically reflected at both steps of access to the S-Cube. Standard AND Extended. This is not the case.
VIP users are forced to buy into the extended versions if they want their money's worth. Not new users. This is pretty lame I think and does not match the VSL pricing philosophy.
I have not read a single argument from the VSL team that will specifically comment on this issue (which is the core question), or provide a logical, convincing & acceptable argument that will justifie their decision.
Quite frankly I'm not surprised of this because I don't see how their position is defendable.