@Cyril-Blanc said:
Yes, MIR PRO is a fantastic software.
I have a question :
If you have multiple track of an instrument what is the best solution :
1) send all the tracks to a bus in Logic and send the bus to MIR PRO
2) send individually each tracks to MIR PRO
- a) pile each tracks at the same position
- b) put each track side by side
Thanks in advance for your answer
It really depends on your preference as to how much control you want.
In my case with VSL's libraries, I sometimes have up to seven MIDI tracks to be able to handle the masses of articulations, including self-created ones by combining them, without having too big expression maps. Since I also use VEPro7, I organise it so that I only have two outputs per instrument in Cubase: one for long and one for short articulations, because these sometimes have to be levelled differently. I then send these outputs separately through MIR Pro 3D, which I use in Cubase and not in VEPro7, at least in most cases. Of course, I place both signals in the same spot.
As I said, everyone has to know this for themselves and experimentation is recommended here to find out what suits one best. One also has to find out for oneself whether one prefers to use MIR Pro 3D in VEPro7, if one uses this software at all, or in the DAW. There is no general answer or solution that applies to everyone, as there are many factors that play a role: workflow, computing power of your machines (if you use multiple computers [master, slave]), how many screens you have and the resulting clarity, etc.
My solution described at the end of the second paragraph is mainly based on the fact that my master PC has the higher CPU performance or GPU performance (I bought the function to have the reverb calculated by my graphics card), which is why I mainly use MIR Pro 3D directly in the DAW. Of course, in my case it's also more practical that I don't have to constantly switch the input of one of my screens in order to access the user interface of my slave and thus be able to operate MIR Pro 3D. Remote Desktop in Windows is also a little too cumbersome for me when I'm in the workflow.
These are the reasons why I use MIR Pro 3D the way I do. However, as already mentioned, this does not mean that this applies to everyone.
By the way, I realise that I also gave you an answer to a question that you didn't even ask, but I thought it might be interesting in context.
