Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

198,895 users have contributed to 43,138 threads and 258,852 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 1 new thread(s), 3 new post(s) and 47 new user(s).

  • I want to buy a Vepro dedicated slave machine. What cpu ?

    Hello, I just bought vepro 7, and I want to build myself some bad boy huge template with everything enabled, single articulation patches etc. 

    My current computer is : Ryzen 5600x, 64 gb dd4 ram, 8 Tb nvme SSDs for the samples. 

    What's the best practises for a slave computer ? Half the VI on the slave and Half on the master ? Everything on the slave ? Maxing out the maste first then filling the slave ? 

    I want to build a 126 gb ddr4 or 196 gb ddr5 RAM computer.

    What CPU would you advice me and why? I would like to stay in the 250-400$ range maximum. 

    Is the cpu even important for the slave? Better go for the fastest single core ? Or the most cores ?

     

    Thanks


  • Hi!

    If both computers are powerful enough, splitting the workload with two VE Pro servers is a good idea (you will need two VE Pro licenses and 1 or 2 physical iLOK USB keys). Otherwise, the samples should go to the more powerful machine.

    The more CPU cores, the better. But a single CPU core should still be fast enough to handle the thread's workload. The question of what CPU is a bit tricky. You can always load/play twice as many tracks and therefore require twice as much computing power.

    The necessary computing power depends on a LOT of variables... your libraries, plugins, project size, audio hardware, audio buffer size, settings etc - my suggestion is you experiment with your existing system and see how far you get. 

    A 100-200 GB template with single patch tracks sounds like the quickest way to run into days or weeks of work - just to discover that your template is unplayable/unreasonable with a 300$ CPU. But at the end of the day, there is no way around spending time on testing and optimizing - and building your template around your hardware.

    Best,
    Andreas


    VSL Team | Product Specialist & Media Editing
  • @Andreas8420 said in [I want to buy a Vepro dedicated slave machine. What cpu ?](/post/317275):

    Hi!

    If both computers are powerful enough, splitting the workload with two VE Pro servers is a good idea (you will need two VE Pro licenses and 1 or 2 physical iLOK USB keys). Otherwise, the samples should go to the more powerful machine.

    The more CPU cores, the better. But a single CPU core should still be fast enough to handle the thread's workload. The question of what CPU is a bit tricky. You can always load/play twice as many tracks and therefore require twice as much computing power.

    The necessary computing power depends on a LOT of variables... your libraries, plugins, project size, audio hardware, audio buffer size, settings etc - my suggestion is you experiment with your existing system and see how far you get. 

    A 100-200 GB template with single patch tracks sounds like the quickest way to run into days or weeks of work - just to discover that your template is unplayable/unreasonable with a 300$ CPU. But at the end of the day, there is no way around spending time on testing and optimizing - and building your template around your hardware.

    Best,
    Andreas

     

    Thanks. I am currently setting up my Vepro template with each kontakt hosting many patches and multiple midi channels and outputs. Is this the way to go for sparing computer ressources ? 


  • ErisnoE Erisno moved this topic from Vienna Instruments Pro on