@hermitage59 said:
There are demos that contradict this, (Holst, etc.) but writing for living doing film is surely more than 'give me a sample base, and i'm doing big and grand, without any gaps between notes.'
Is the current trend the beginning of death for Pizz and Scat, and the deafening roar that is brief silence?
Regards,
Alex.
I read the subject title Pizza and Scat? Whoa - where did that come from. Stac! Yeah - OK. Scat singing and playing Taste (Rory Gallagher) style.
You almost have to seperate out the two writing styles and elements here.
First, the type of Wagnerian/Beethoven style takes a lot of time, skill and knowledge. I certainly don't have enough of those 3 elements to go down that road.
Film scoring style is always subject to time constraints amongst other things - writers don't have the time to write vast works and even if they could or did - it would almost certainly (a) not be wanted by the director and (b) derivative. Listen to any film orchestral score in recent years - mostly derivative, either from a classic or another film writer - which doesn't bother me as long as it's good and it works with the film.
Just had a similar conversation with a new young Hitchcock/Herrmann convert somewhere else. Most of todays commercial writing, whether it's for film/tv or Classic FM is musical wallpaper that does not require any effort from the audience/listener. That doesn't make it bad in my book - but it's not challenging. There again, a lay non musical audience DON'T really want to be challenged intellectually on any level in our society today.
Do the arts mirror society - or does society mirror the arts?
Going back to Holst's day and way before that, there was a lot more time to savour the arts. Everything today is instant and disposable, including music. The biggest selling music in America and probably Europe is Hip Hop. Go figure!
When you talk about sweeping chords and brass swells and a thin melody line etc - this is the lowest common denominator in this film form today and has been for ages. The younger people who wish to write for images have their filmscore heroes from only a few years back - they haven't even seen or heard 95% of what's gone before - so it's no surprise that demos, for instance, will go down that route quite a bit of the time. But directors must want this style of writing a lot of the time - the circle continues.
It doesn't bother me as much as it used to - I'll listen to anything these days.
I did a demo ages ago that really spits stac and pizz - and the placement is totally unreal in terms of what a 'real' orchestra would sound like live - which is what I like personally. I don't want things to sound real all the time. Films aren't real - people in films and camera angles, editing over and under a shoulder etc are NOT real - this is why I cannot understand when writers are using sample libraries they get hung up about REAL!
[:D]