Comparing to VI Brass1 and Brass2 will Synchron Brass be really important upgade? If anyone of VSL users made this comparison? I´d like to hear what changes (improvements) in sound and articulations this upgrade will mean. Thank you
VI Brass 1 and 2 are very "classical" sounding, while Synchron Brass is decidedly "cinematic". I'd hesitate to call Synchron Brass an "upgrade". I think it's more appropriate to say it's complimentary and fulfills a different sonic purpose.
When comparing the two, I think these are the most useful observations:
- VI Brass is dry, and therefore more flexibly used in a variety of situations. Synchron Brass is not dry, so it's stuck in the Synchron Stage. However, that stage - along with the absurdly large ensemble sizes - gives the sound an incredible "thunderclap" effect that is very, very difficult (if not impossible) to replicate digitally. This is most noticable in the short notes.
- VI Brass is comprehensive when it comes to articulations. Synchron Brass is made up of both originally recorded material and material taken from BBO products. While the structure of the keyswitching remains constant throughout, it also means that certain patches lack certain things. For example, the most noticable omission is that the 9 Trombones don't have a legato patch (as they were originally recorded for use in BBO, which is not meant to be as detailed or comprehensive as other product lines).
- VI Brass does not contain anything like the Low Brass patch in Synchron Brass (Which is also available as single BBO libraries). Since that patch was recorded in unison and in situ, it has an extraordinarily powerful sound.
- Synchron Brass introduces a seemingly small but amazing feature called "Timbre Adjust" which is essentially a custom filter control designed specifically for these brass instruments. This, along with very smooth velocity layers and crossfading, makes the dynamic control of the whole library *extremely* responsive, playable, and smooth.
Hope that helps inform your decision!