@Dewdman42 said:

[...] i prefer to use Miracle or some other algorithmic reverb just for the very longest and latest part of the tail in order to get a bit more modulation and movement and fill in the cracks, but all the early reflections and some of the late reflections too are coming from MirPro, which capture the character of the rooms they are modeling...

[...]

👍 That sounds very familiar! 😊 

BTW - talking about long natural reverb tails: To my ears, RoomPack 5 - derived from Pernegg Monastery - has the most beautiful and even reverb of all MIR Pro Venues. As a matter of fact I've already used it for mixing movie scores*) in 3D by using the IRs from the choir's balcony as top layer. Now _that's_ some nice spatial enveloping, believe me. 8-)

*) .... admittedly not your typical "epic" Hollywood soundtrack ;-)

@Dewdman42 said:

Roompacks 2 and 6 are awesome and probably the most "hollywood" for lack of a better word, but if you are into eclectic sound, you should definitely check out Mystic spaces pack also...it has some absolutely dreamy long tail reverberation in it.  I started with 2 and 6, but ended up buying all the packs eventually anyway I just couldn't help it.  The churches they sampled and mystic spaces...have really cool interesting sounds on their own and if you're into eclectic sound I think you will find a lot of reverberation in the tail to work with in those spaces.

Using a hybrid approach, nothing wrong with that, but I also agree with Dietz, you can acheive as lot right in Mir all alone.  i prefer to use Miracle or some other algorithmic reverb just for the very longest and latest part of the tail in order to get a bit more modulation and movement and fill in the cracks, but all the early reflections and some of the late reflections too are coming from MirPro, which capture the character of the rooms they are modeling...

I took your advice and experimented with integrating more of MIR's reverb and found what you're saying to be quite true.  I could hear the distinct character of each instrument's echoes off of the walls in the Grosserhaal venue, something that gets completely lost in a hybrid approach.  It occurred to me there's a lot more to depth and spacial information than what's included in the first .3 to .5 ms, and that depth can achieve so much beautiful nuance that I find lacking in a lot of soundtrack music these days. 

I also found that stereo separation of like instruments (for example, the two flutes) remains consistent the more of MIR's tail there is due to the spatial information in there. If they are bussed to a centered algorithmic reverb, the similar timbres and pitches blend together towards the center even if panned very wide unless the signal is very, very dry (unacceptably dry, in this case)  This is an issue with reverb bussing that's been bugging me for a while and MIR fixes that handily.

I also investigated the mystic spaces and decided to put sounds from Massive and Absynth in there along with VSL instruments.  The results were incredible, especially when ping-ponged arpeggiators were placed on the balcony hotspots.  I was able to achieve a level of symbioses between sounds that couldn't be more different.  Some amount of algorithmic sweetening was still needed to make the synths sound like they weren't coming out of a synth keyboard, but you were right - the monasteries are amazing for off-the-wall stuff!

In short, I'll be saving up for the roompack bundle.  Like you, I'll just end up getting them all anyway, especially after hearing the konzerthaus organ where it belongs.  

A question for you: when you apply MIRacle, what settings do you tweak to properly "crossfade" from MIR's tail?  Do you decrease the gain of MIRacle so it "superimposes" on MIR or do you tweak the pre-delay so it "takes over" where MIR leaves off?  

Dietz,

Again, I can't thank you enough for how much time you're going to save me panning and fading in the coming years.  I'm excited to dig deep into this program.

One last question, if I may:

Is there any way to see the EQ graph of the different character presets (like Silk, Air, etc.)  I ask because I'd be interested in matching the character preset of a Vienna instrument to a similar, non-Vienna instrument.  For example, I'd like to match the "Bite" character of the Vienna nylon guitar to a Turkish Oud instrument from Kontakt.

Thanks for indulging my endless curiousity.

- Sam

regarding Miracle, so far I've just been using some of the "hybrid" presets that come with it, which generally have ~50ms of predelay.  Dietz may have much more to say about that, which I would like to hear also.

There are lots of algorithmic reverbs which can work fine for this, but Miracle works great and sounds good, included with MirPro and has some room specific presets.  Main thing is to block the ER's in the algorithmic reverb so that you only hear the long tails from it after predelay. 

@Dewdman42 said:

Main thing is to block the ER's in the algorithmic reverb so that you only hear the long tails from it after predelay. 

MIRacle doesn't add ERs in the actual sense of the word, it's all about the late reverb tail.

@Dewdman42 said:

Main thing is to block the ER's in the algorithmic reverb so that you only hear the long tails from it after predelay.

@Dewdman42 said:

[...] I guess there are no absolutes but can you say anything about why or when we might want to adjust the predelay in Miracle for hybrid scenarios? I guess it would depend on the room and how much we want the ER’s to stand out, but I’d be interested in your wisdom here

It depends on the room, of course, but also on the sound you're aiming for. If you want the algo reverb to be less of an obvious effect and more like some an unobtrusive layer a you will choose longer pre-delay. If you need a dense and clearly artificial tail, the pre-delay will have to be shorter.

... in the end, it's a decision I take on a case-by-case basis. 😊 Sorry that I can't supply you with hard rules.

had a feeling you'd say that ;-)  but makes sense and the info you provied is useful.

Dietz,

I had too much coffee and thought of an off-topic, hypothetical mind-bender to pose to you:

Let's say you and your crew captured a top-notch, state of the art mixing/monitoring studio the same way you've captured MIR impulses of the current venues. 

Let's also say that you own a pair of studio monitors with a completely flat, perfect frequency response. 

Also, also, let's say that you place these monitors and yourself in a perfectly anechoic room that, to absolute perfection - matches the dimensions of the mixing room you captured the MIR impulses in and sit down to mix.

If you then load up MIR with the "mixing room" venue, select any song or whatever that you want to mix, and pan the outputs to precisely where the studio monitors are in the actual anechoic chamber, would you effectively get the same exact audio feedback as if you were playing that song through studio monitors in the mixing room itself?

*twilight zone music*

- Sam

Yes, but only at midnight on a Blue Moon, after dancing five cycles counter-clockwise around your DAW with your eyes closed and your your left index finger in your right ear.

*Herman Munster theme song*

;-D