Are you interested in an Orchestration community thread?

[hermitage59]

There have been many threads and discussions here about orchestration and it's role in the whole composition process. Those who have read my collection of posts will understand i consider it essential as a skill, equal to composition.

However, Orchestration is an individual 'thing' much the same as composition, and my preferences and views are just one opinion. There are many members here who have shown through demonstrations, and posted work, that they are particularly skilled in the art of orchestration.

Is there an interest from others of you to share this information on a regular basis to those who may wish to know but may not have formal training in music theory?
I mean no disrespect when i say this, and have worked with many great musicians who couldn't read a note, but could improvise or 'lug' better than formally trained types. (With general exceptions both ways)

It would require some thought to explaning the process from a 'non note reader's' point of view, and keeping in mind the need not to stifle natural ability with a lot of long winded explanations.

The VSL library of sound gives a great opportunity to bring to life wonderful layers of sound, and many other sonic variations far in excess of the slow and often tedious work of planning a score note by note in a formal sense.

Some basis principles of Orchestration and Theory could give many, collectively, a chance to utilise that investment in many more ways.


Are you interested?


Regards to you all,


Alex.

[Holgmeister]

...

[dpcon]

We talk about that kind of thing here all the time. In fact VSL renamed this forum to it's present title such is our interest. So go for it.

Dave Connor

[mathis]

@Holgmeister said:

No School, no University extension here, but a bunch of private dull & ignorant teachers that kill the last remaining piece of creativity in their students before they finished the notorious "Czerny" book.

There´s a reason why I left Germany for study... [:'(]

Yes, guys, go ahead. I already löearnt a lot about orchestration is this forum. It´s up to you to make it more lively again.

[ralf]

@Another User said:

No School, no University extension here, but a bunch of private dull & ignorant teachers that kill the last remaining piece of creativity in their students before they finished the notorious "Czerny" book.

That's not true. You're ignorant yourself if you mark your "creativity" above everything else when you're a student. If one don't want to learn then why study at all? You'v already got your creativity, right? And as Bruckner said:

"Erst die Regel, dann das freie Schaffen!" and "Kontrapunkt ist nicht Genialität, sondern nur Mittel zum Zweck"

A wise man [:)]

[mathis]

The second quote is reasonable, but the first one is simply dumb.

[Holgmeister]

...

[Holgmeister]

...

[mathis]

Well, I´m always good for Ordnung und Disziplin! [:D]

I have no clue about instrumentation, I never went through some real theoretical breakdown. If there´s a question about instrumentation popping up and I think I can answer it (which is rarely the case) I´ll answer it.

[William]

Though I hate to contradict the great Bruckner I agree with that first quote being wrong. The main reason is some of the musicians I admire most - for example the great Blues players - never learned any rules but just absorbed them. Learning should probably be unconscious anyway. If you are interested you will learn almost instantly without rules. If you are not you will forget every rule a few minutes after learning it. Though maybe rules can inspire you sometimes. I remember being told to avoid all parallel fifths in music theory. I did so in the class exercise, but then went home and wrote an entire piece based on parallel fifths. I felt much better afterward.

[PaulR]

@hermitage59 said:

There have been many threads and discussions here about orchestration and it's role in the whole composition process. Those who have read my collection of posts will understand i consider it essential as a skill, equal to composition.

Are you interested?
Regards to you all,
Alex.

Go for it Alex - however, I'm not quite sure what you mean and how it would work.
This would mean members having to post examples of work - or just snippets from work they are having trouble with?

I would be no use anyway, because my ideas about orchestration are shall we say, a little different.

I'm more interested in the Herrmann style of orchestration and even more so in that 'sound'. That sound is based on weird micing techniques tht Herrmann discovered when working for CBS radio - but a lot of members don't like it. They want everything to sound like a 'real' orchestra' when it's being played live in an auditorium. I have no interest in that particularly, because when things come out of TV speakers, it's not really relevent.

Anyway, very quick, garbled ramble here because I now find i have to go out for a walk (if you can call it that in my case) along the beach. Humph!

[ralf]

@Another User said:

Of course I am continously learning, try to improve every day, but nobody will ever stop me again writing my own music, especially not prussian rulekeepers. My advise: Never listen to that phrase, just start making music.

This is the year 2005, why do we teach people 1850-style? Do we have not moved on in our culture? Why is it always "Ordnung und Disziplin" (i.e. order & discipline, these so called german values)

Well of course [:)]
You must have met some really strange teachers.
I am a german music teacher myself. When I was a little younger (I'm still 27) I had the same attitude: Why should I learn such stuff? Why can't I write my own music? Why am I not allowed to do this or that (even when it sounds great) and so on...

Today I suffer from these thoughts cause I realized that I can't combine perfect clean composing style with my creativity all the time. We are talking about symphonic instrumentation and composition. Jazz is something totally different as well as Herrmann is (He was a genius in his own way. I currently teach Psycho score at school).
I admit that the first Bruckner quote is unfair because you need to know the context in order to understand what he meant when he said that to his students (after he did he always blinked with his eyes and said "But if you take a little freedom you have more [:)]. But he always knew that you need all the tools that are available in order to compose with your total creativity in action.

That so called Ordnung und Disziplin is absolutely fine - it was in 1850 and still is today. There's so much music junk out there cause so many talented musicians think they only need their creativity. And everyone wonders why their music is forgotten soon after it's composed. Those old guys survived until today - there's a reason for that [[;)]]

Best Regards

[hermitage59]

To All,
I was thinking of a pool of ideas, related directly to at least basic guidelines for where each instrument sounds generally best, that sort of thing. For example, unless you do it for a reason, you don't try to write flutes below bassoons.
There are certainly no hard and fast rules, nor should there be. But there are some principles that can in effect, unlock more of the creative process. Not all knowledge is bad, it's just the delivery that can be daunting, and sometimes a complete waste of time. (e.g. uninspired, mechanical instruction)

There are certain styles that have a particular sound, for example Beethoven is quite different to Tchaikovsky. Why?
And John Williams writes in a different way to Bernstein.
And where do they put the instruments to create that sound?

Which combination of instruments at what dynamic level produce an organ sound without the organ?


I've had a couple of emails already from people who would like to read music and understand a little more about the process and why. It may be useful, and potentially fruitful.





Regards

[PaulR]

@ralf said:

Jazz is something totally different as well as Herrmann is (He was a genius in his own way. I currently teach Psycho score at school).

What do your students think of the Psycho score Ralf? Where did you get the score btw - I have been trying to get Herrmann scores for years without any luck so far.

[hermitage59]

Here we go with some tips and tricks.

The orchestra is generally thought of as 4 separate families, Strings, Woodwind, Brass and Percussion.
However, sometimes this way of understanding creates a reluctance in composing to mix them unless in loud passages (Tutti). And there acertain combinations that fit together better than others.

Strings and woodwinds are fairly close bedfellows. But because of the differences in tone, a woodwind instrument at a fairly medium dynamic marking, say mf, can easily stick out and not blend so easily.

It is a general guideline that in normal 'play' at a medium dynamic, 1 w/w instrument will equal a section of strings, based on tone and naturally more penetrating sound.

So, marking the w/w one dynamic marking lower can help. This doesn't affect the strings, but the tone of the w/w e.g. clarinet tends to thicken the sound without
being noticed.
Strings= mf
Clarinet=mp

Like any guideline this is not hard and fast and depends what you're trying to do.

Excluding percussion, the next combination of W/W and Brass is fairly close too.
The W/W tends to soften the brass sound, and the brass in turn add weight to the W/W. Again this depends on markings. At a soft volume, e.g pp, the trombones and tuba blend fairly well with bassoons and clarinets, as do the horns, giving the W/W a weightier feel without the penetrating tone.

More to follow.

Regards,

Alex.

[hermitage59]

And in addition there are a couple of instruments that help the blending process.

Bassoons have long been written with French Horns, as they add a little sharpness and timbre without sticking out. Likewise, a combinatin of Bassoons, Clarinets and French Horns can create a smooth full sound at a soft dynamic without any of the instruments sounding out of place.

It's also intersting to note that one brass instument, trumpet or trombone generally equals 2 horns. So when you write a brass section piece it's worth bolstering the horns to match the sound more closely and get better balance.

Regards,

Alex.

[hermitage59]

This is generally true for horns and W/W as well. 2 Horns to one clarinet seems to blend well.

Strings and Brass are further apart and it's normally harder to blend the two families. The tones are quite distinctive and tend to stay separate in the 'ear'.

So, back to our link instruments.

Strings at mf
Trumets and trombones at mf

Bassons and horns, or clarinets and horns provide a useful link and help merge the two families closer together.


Next, we want to thicken the Cellos a little in an accompanying part, possible longer notes. French horns are good at this, and 2nd or 4th horns provide a nice blend with cellos for a fuller sound, without destroying the sound of the cellos. This again depends on dynamics. The clarinets too are useful, especially with the violas. If the violas are written against full sections of 1st and second violins, it's possible and helpful to add the clarinets to the violas to bolster their part(Again the horns can fill this role if they are written below middle C or close to it). Makes an interesting sound too.

More to follow,

Regards,

Alex.

[hermitage59]

It's fairly important to note that horns don't behave like other sections.

Horn players in a modern orchestra tend to be specialist 'high or low' musicians.
Because of the nature of the instrument and the demands placed on it, the Horn section is generally split as follows:

1st Horn=High
2nd Horn=Low
3rd Horn=High
4th Horn Low

And high or low means pitch.


Alex.

[mathis]

@hermitage59 said:

And high or low means pitch.

Oh, I thought you meant drinking level..

[hermitage59]

That's in another section under 'Instrument Families........Consumption!'

Regards

Alex!