Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

194,047 users have contributed to 42,907 threads and 257,904 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 19 new post(s) and 99 new user(s).

  • My 2 cents in this thread. Today I worked on a piece with much legato. It was first searching how to get things the way I want it. I discovered the edit page. By giving attack a number beneath zero (I did the ultimate, -2), the gap between notes is deminished. By increasing the sustain I discovered another way to make the legato more smooth.
    Furthermore I used the polyphone legato mode to have the opportunity to overlap tones when needed. The result of one short melody line (just a few notes) I send here. For me this legato is good, perhaps for others not, I don't know of course.

    Image


  • last edited
    last edited

    @MMKA said:

    My 2 cents in this thread. Today I worked on a piece with much legato. It was first searching how to get things the way I want it. I discovered the edit page. By giving attack a number beneath zero (I did the ultimate, -2), the gap between notes is deminished. By increasing the sustain I discovered another way to make the legato more smooth.
    Furthermore I used the polyphone legato mode to have the opportunity to overlap tones when needed. The result of one short melody line (just a few notes) I send here. For me this legato is good, perhaps for others not, I don't know of course.

    Thank you for sharing this. This mod really makes the Synchron Strings legato sounds it should be!!


  • last edited
    last edited

    @mobileavatar said:

    We do not have the experience but VSL should. By now, they should many convincing audio demos to clear our doubts. After all it is their product. VSL should convince us it's worthwhile to spend the time and not wasting it. Apart from us being the early adopters who purchased the product purely out of faith in the VSL brand, I am sure they want to attract news customers as well.

    The fact there is no convincing demo... it's already suspicious enough.

    The fact VSL has been very quiet after last week release, it's even more suspicious.

    Don't be surprised when they announce new product(s) in July... as a way to divert our attention.

    Exactly.  

    VSL needs to post some great sounding new Synchron Strings Demos, produced using the new Synchron Player, where are they ?  Nothing to hear so far. Maybe they need some more time, hopefully not a few months until we get to hear some new demos. But if they do post some new demos that sound wonderful, showing the quality of the legatos, shorts, longs, and other articulations, that will make us go Wow !  Is that Synchron Strings Playing ? then this will change everything as far as the negative perception, or aura this library has surrounding it. 


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Beat Kaufmann said:

    I think that some are disappointed because they were expecting the Chamberstrings or another Dimensionstrings library - now simply integrated with "space". But this is a string orchestra of great proportions - similar to the Appassionata Strings and not for playing Baroque Music
    It's not even Appassionata Strings. It's more akin to Orchestral Strings, like the basic building block.

  • last edited
    last edited

    @muziksculp said:

    VSL needs to post some great sounding new Synchron Strings Demos, produced using the new Synchron Player, where are they ?  Nothing to hear so far. Maybe they need some more time, hopefully not a few months until we get to hear some new demos. But if they do post some new demos that sound wonderful, showing the quality of the legatos, shorts, longs, and other articulations, that will make us go Wow !  Is that Synchron Strings Playing ? then this will change everything as far as the negative perception, or aura this library has surrounding it. 

    Don't know what you're expecting. You already know for a fact that the Synchron Player changed nothing about the samples, the sound or the scripting. Why are some new demos miraculously supposed to convince you of something that the already existing ones didn't?

    Really don't understand your position here. You got the library. Install it already and try it out for yourself! Otherwise, let it go. Not trying to be argumentative - I genuinely don't understand your position.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @JimmyHellfire said:

    Don't know what you're expecting. You already know for a fact that the Synchron Player changed nothing about the samples, the sound or the scripting. Why are some new demos miraculously supposed to convince you of something that the already existing ones didn't?

    Really don't understand your position here. You got the library. Install it already and try it out for yourself! Otherwise, let it go. Not trying to be argumentative - I genuinely don't understand your position.

    Ok than to me it seems that you have still explore the Synchron-Player a bit more. (Even if the Support is really horrible lazy) The Answer is: You cant use the Library with VI the way you can with the SyPl.

    And yes after the development Work is done it is up to those who care about the m,usic to explore it.

    Still my humble opinion is that it still needs it's time to adapt kind of the musical language developed with previous Libraries and Plkayers to the new one. Than we will see, what it really is about the new Library and its ambitious Player.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @muziksculp said:

    VSL needs to post some great sounding new Synchron Strings Demos, produced using the new Synchron Player, where are they ? Nothing to hear so far. Maybe they need some more time, hopefully not a few months until we get to hear some new demos. But if they do post some new demos that sound wonderful, showing the quality of the legatos, shorts, longs, and other articulations, that will make us go Wow ! Is that Synchron Strings Playing ? then this will change everything as far as the negative perception, or aura this library has surrounding it.
    Don't know what you're expecting. You already know for a fact that the Synchron Player changed nothing about the samples, the sound or the scripting. Why are some new demos miraculously supposed to convince you of something that the already existing ones didn't? Really don't understand your position here. You got the library. Install it already and try it out for yourself! Otherwise, let it go. Not trying to be argumentative - I genuinely don't understand your position. He's been offered this advice numerous times, but continues to stand firm with his, shall we say, unique perspective. I can't fathom purchasing something of this value and not bother even installing it. Sometimes I think there are people who are more about collecting the tools and talking about them, than using them. If music is a spectator sport for you, save the money, and simply enjoy the work of others...but for goodness sake, give the endless repetitive requests for new demos a rest! Just my two cents.

  • I must say I agree with fahl5. This is a huge new library, there are lots of new features, and it has depth. I would not presume to judge such a serious undertaking without at least doing a whole project with it, which is what I am doing at the moment. And so far I like it. I'll have more to say, but not before I know it MUCH better than I do at this point. When I first started using VIPro there were lots of things I didn't see the reason for, but now I understand them. I'm sure the same thing will happen with the Synchron player.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @AntoineM said:

    I own every other VSL string libraries. I love all of them, especially Dimension Strings.

    This one is the only one I frankly do not like. The main reasons: 

    • Lack of basic articulations such as a real portamento
    • Cheap/fake articulations (fp/sfz)
    • Lack of expressiveness in high velocities
    • No divisi like in LASS.
    • No real innovation.
    • => Bad value for money!

    And so much wait for so few… 

    I also feel that VSL do not care about customer feedback. They never « pamper Â» their customers. Plus, if you lose or break the painful dongle, you are totally f..cked.

    My level of satisfaction so far : 2 / 10 (for the flautandos and some shorts).

    Ha. Basically my review. Have the Super Package, so basically everything. Love most of VSL but always missed a bit more singing legato. Sad that SS1 didn't work out as promised, and actually fail the most with its legato. 

    The flautandos sounds great and already sits in a film. But unfortunately that's kinda it. Found another string library that have filled the gap. Probably last time I'm pre-ordering a library.

    2/10 😞


  • last edited
    last edited

    @AntoineM said:

    I own every other VSL string libraries. I love all of them, especially Dimension Strings.

    This one is the only one I frankly do not like. The main reasons: 

    • Lack of basic articulations such as a real portamento
    • Cheap/fake articulations (fp/sfz)
    • Lack of expressiveness in high velocities
    • No divisi like in LASS.
    • No real innovation.
    • => Bad value for money!

    And so much wait for so few… 

    I also feel that VSL do not care about customer feedback. They never « pamper Â» their customers. Plus, if you lose or break the painful dongle, you are totally f..cked.

    My level of satisfaction so far : 2 / 10 (for the flautandos and some shorts).

    Ha. Basically my review. Have the Super Package, so basically everything. Love most of VSL but always missed a bit more singing legato. Sad that SS1 didn't work out as promised, and actually fail the most with its legato. 

    The flautandos sounds great and already sits in a film. But unfortunately that's kinda it. Found another string library that have filled the gap. Probably last time I'm pre-ordering a library.

    2/10 😞

    Hi saxmand,

    Thanks for the feedback.

    That's very unfortunate, maybe VSL has something to say about this.

    Sadly, so far they are not replying, or at least letting users know that they are concerned about the dissatisfaction with Synchron Strings 1 quality, and that they might be willing to fix any issues, or even re-do a big chunk of this library to improve it. 


  • Considering the expenses of developing libraries/recording/editing, I wouldn't keep my hopes to high. At least that's where I am now...

  • Now that I have just done a little project with the Synchron Strings, I want to mention a few things I LIKE about them. And I also have and use all the other VSL strings.

    1) Ability to control the degree of marcato attack note by note,

    2) ability to crossfade between different degrees of vibrato,

    3) ability to do the above at the same time!

    4) crossfading from normal to soft legato and vice versa,

    5) more velocity levels.

    Some (not all) of these things were possible before, using crossfaded patches, but even there, with a lot more work.

    It's taking me a while  to learn the new player, but so far I think it's worth it.

    I'll have more to say as I work more with it.