Yeah, I just tried MIRx which gave me results I don't like ( f.ex. 2nd chamber violins only in the front right side and not front left-mid side). I did not try it for a long time and maybe I did somtehing wrong, so -disappointed and a little anxious- I downloaded MIRpro24 with the Vienna Konzerthaus IRs of 4GB (30 min. with 3 MBit downstream ) and after settelling it the results were much more like I was expecting.
Is there any chance to make the MIRx solution sound almost like the pretty fast and good results with MIR Pro?
-
MIRx and MIR Pro will sound identical, provided that you use the settings of the former within the latter (a.k.a. "MIRx Mode")
MIRx will receive updates, that's for sure - but of course MIRx will not receive the functionality of MIR Pro. 😊 This would be against the whole idea of MIRx, obviously.
BTW: If you want to use different stage positions with MIRx than the ones provided by the presets, there's always the possibility to use the General Purpose settings for that task.
HTH,
/Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library -
@Dietz said:
Awww, come on ... don't be petty. Feed-back is the new feed-forward, if you get my drift. ;-)
Dietz, I think you misunderstand. Nothing petty going on here. I was talking about feedback. Not feedback. You know, that horrible howl in the speakers. Like I heard yesterday at a session, when the assistant forgot to do something with the digital desk whilst we were re-amping. Wowser....!
DG
-
@Dietz said:
All is good. I know your were talking about feedback, not feedback - but I mean feed-back, not feed-forward. You know, not all compressors are equal ... ;-D
IOW - it was just jolty wordplay.
Don't talk to me about compressors. I think that I ate so many biscuits yesterday, that my trousers are acting as compressors at the moment. [^o)]
DG
