Something that was alluded to on another thread by JBM was very interesting: the fact that composers using samples are always using them as a mirror of normal orchestras. Of course when a conventional orchestra is being imitated, as in a film score perhaps, that is understandeable. But the art of using samples, if there is one, has absolutely no need to emulate the balances or numbers or makeup of the orchestra. Like having twenty flute parts along with seven bass drums and a viola section, or huge numbers of brass that could never be assembled in real life, etc. This could easily be as natural a part of sampled music as a normal orchestra, and yet everyone without thinking always just does the same old conventional approaches to assembling the orchestral forces.
When ones looks at how certain composers such as Varese or Messeien or Bernard Herrmann created completely unconventional ensembles without the ease or practicality of sampled sounds, this becomes even more noticeable. I think it is time composers did more defying of conventional practice to create new sonorities based upon previously impossible combinations.
When ones looks at how certain composers such as Varese or Messeien or Bernard Herrmann created completely unconventional ensembles without the ease or practicality of sampled sounds, this becomes even more noticeable. I think it is time composers did more defying of conventional practice to create new sonorities based upon previously impossible combinations.