Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

192,118 users have contributed to 42,832 threads and 257,540 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 13 new thread(s), 40 new post(s) and 200 new user(s).

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    P.S.: I wouldn't make that rent-bet with me if I were you; how will you generate those endless loops when you're homeless and without electricity? You'd have to play an instrument!...
    I do not personally generate loops. So there is zero possibility I will have said that I did. This is all a straw man you require in argumentation. I have said however, that I came to composition as an instrumentalist. My juries at conservatory were before the La Salle quartet, Violin Partita #3 by JS Bach in front of a grim Henry Meyer for instance and I never got a grade below A. 

    I should produce some loops, professionally since it's something I could get paid well for if I find a way for placing them. I through-compose based in improvisation. I never use someone else's rhythm, basslines, etc.. It's anathema to me. I am so far from fitting your sad attempts to slap up a straw man it's insane. So I endeavored to make myself clear in the first things I typed. Which you decided to forget, or something, in your haste to justify your bs.

    If you would like to wager real money that you can provide me with a useful transcription of particulars of my music, I really could use the money. I have no doubts here. It will be a gobsmacking amount of work. I'm in, you?


  • last edited
    last edited

    @civilization 3 said:

    Notation for me is a middleman in the thought process I don't need or desire. It just isn't the thing in itself. Before DAWS, it's how we recorded the idea we know we'll forget, and beyond that the convenient means for communicating the idea to another musician. It is utterly inadequate

    Yes, notation is so inadequate -  like Mahler's 2nd Symphony for example.  I was just watching a very well-done documentary on it, so it came to mind.  Anyone today would have done so much better with a DAW, wouldn't they?  Notation is so old...

    You really are unable to follow what I said completely? For me, for what I in 2012 with a vocabulary that did not exist in that time, it is a middleman I do not have any use for. For my own music. I have a great satchel of notated works no one will ever hear. I am happy to use the tools available to me in the present to get around this, yes, dated paradigm. And I look forward to further innovations.

    If you would like to demonstrate Mahler's 2nd by a notation program, render VSL, what-have-you from that, my point about its being a short hand of signs to indicate what to do, while the performers behind a conductor provide the missing ingredients, will be revealed in full. Don't kid me about this.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @jasensmith said:

    Sorry to chime in late here and I didn't have time to read the whole thread but I recently purchased EW's Silk and there are some one note performances in that library that I have mixed feelings over.  On the one hand, I agree with Erik that a composer can't call himself a composer, with a strait face, if he/she is leaning so much on these software "crutches" if you will.  In fact, they are more like "wheelchairs" and "retirement homes" for some so-called composers out there.  If they're just runs or tremelos I don't have a problem with that. 

    On the other hand, I wasn't familiar with the abilities and attributes of some of the exotic instruments sampled in Silk so the one note performances saved me a lot of research and Google searching.  I must admit that I did apreciate that.

    I can honestly say that I never incorporated any of the performance samples from Silk in any of my compositions.

    I have used two from RA. These are mostly rather hopeless. they are designed to get a superficial flavor. These are technically loops, by the way, the scales in VSL libs are loops, the timpani rolls and all of this are loops. They are useful, many of them cannot be got in the piano roll off of single hit samples.

    The EWQL tunings are also not documented so it's largely a matter of trial and error. Many of them are names that do not have much meaning to a musician of the particular school in fact. And frankly if you rely on google for your understanding it will remain sketchy.

    I entirely agree with the idea someone is a joke as a composer if they do not have this understanding and only ever have relied on prefabrications they bought. But the thread title is so bellicose I'm surprised it's even allowed here. 


  • Civ - I never got a grade above A as far as I can remember. [<:o)]

    The fact of the matter is - there will be more and more sample libraries that are solely or include loops of recorded phrases played by orchestras. There are in fact, quite a few sample libraries now that include tutti notes. One of the old ones in samples is effects usually played tutti. I remember doing an orchestral job where we'd set up one or two of these sample orchestral effects and then set about taking them apart in order to notate them for a real orchestra. How insane is that? Didn't take as long as I thought it would though.

    The bottom line is the type of films made for current audiences. Films haven't been made for people like me for donkeys years. Ergo, filmcore music is going to be also for current audiences. Let me try to quantify that.

    Yesterday, being driven back from an auction, for fun I counted how many drivers I could see, driving while on their mobile telephones. Over a mile distance, I spotted four. Films today are for people who like to drive and use their mobile phones at the same time. And so is the music. It's mainly made for and by people with poor attention spans. Loud noises and big CGI is what they want. And that's what they generally get. That's the big money today. So I wouldn't get too worried about looped sample libraries.


  • I had a delusion for a very short time of being a classical soloist. I expected to get graded worse by that Henry Meyer, having the gall to play that one. Maybe he felt sorry for me. 

    I don't watch a lot of movies. I am watching the tv program "Fringe" now and I have found the music of this guy Giacchino quite distasteful. I think where he isn't strictly from pedestrian (or minimal) he's copying someone's score. Clever boy, but...

    Sure the world is going right down the tubes... I would hope my POV on the prefab use and people that are not, will never be musicians and in my experience disrespect musicians out of a special resentment, is clear enough. I found myself tilting at windmills and decided to step back. But as far as these libraries, it's just some tools. I haven't bought any of them. There was that one Zero-G thing more or less for horror movie composers I was looking at, I think it was kind of innovative.

    I used to hang at another forum that can get to quite contentious, and I tell you what, a thread title like this thing has would not be tolerated. 


  • @civilization 3: (with the risk of providing too much entertainment for moderators and friends)

    1) Don't try at this late stage of the game to contradict yourself, it's too late for that sadly... Never before have you "agreed" that using sets of fully composed-orchestrated-performed measures of music was (as you chose to say) an anathema, which is all I ever said really. But what am I saying? You have a split personality (apparently war-tugging for that single brain-cell). In the same post you suggest that when you call someone to extemporize on your chords/rhythm/whatever, you still consider the whole piece to be your music. Well, legally it is (I never addressed legalities - you can spew out a whole track made completely out of Symphobia-stencils and legally it's still yours...), but in reality, those measures that any other musician contributed from their own imagination are a collaboration! And don't bring up examples like Lutoslawcki, Ligeti, or Cage (not that you would/could), I have explained about them in older posts. And of course I have in the past qualified my objections to such practices by admitting that true professionals who actually can notate/program those performances, sometimes use these softwares for reasons of expediency or quality of sound (as they are actually recorded live), so again, line 1 of this paragraph...

    2) This is a symphonic forum, the Vienna Symphonic Library forum. My signature pertains - and always has - to symphonic music and I include film-symphonic-music to my definition. Although I believe that a composer in any genre must be able to either write/program or play his music (or he does not merit the title), in this forum I am concerned almost exclusively with symphonic music, so don't talk to me about my signature.

    3) Your "lack of articulateness" is a given. And there was never a "desperate attempt to dismiss" what you have said on my part, I just never addressed anything that was off-topic (see symphonic music pertinences)

    4) Maybe you should restrict yourself to that other totalitarian and politically correct (hence, retarded) forum where they sensor free expression when it is considered offensive. Lest we forget, my title here is not targetting anyone specifically, unless... you read too much of yourself into it?... Which leads us to 

    5) If you feel the need to tell us what a great musician you are by citing Meyer (who knows, maybe he liked your  t i t s - I can see Hal flashing Dietz), it is too late for that as well. In fact, you know nothing about music, do you? At all I mean. I'm greatly surprised to see PaulR is even bothering with you... I can safely make that kind of generilization since you believe that the most gifted composers of the western tradition (~1750-~1910) "wrote puerile melodies". That includes Mozart, Schubert, Bellini, Chopin, Bizet, Tchaikovsky, Verdi, etc., while you NEVER refer us to any superior composers of melody. Further, you publicly suggested that Wagner's entire contribution to music was the invention of "some horns"(!!). Don't make me waste time digging up that post of yours...

    And don't say I am being elitist, since a) I at least have never heard anybody from Jazz, Rock, Ethno, or other kinds of music, disrespecting or failing to appreciate the incredible melodic gifts of the above composers, summarily! And b) I am not necessarily ensnared by the masterpieces of the classical tradition, nor do I make "gods" out of a specific kind of composer. Each to their own in matters of taste of course, but for example, in the proverbial desert island scenario, I will take the entire oeuvres of Pink Floyd and Abba with me, rather than those of say Glazunov and Nielsen (to cite well known composers).

    P.S.1: You have a syndrome against notation. No one said it's perfect, but I think it is because you know ****-all about that as well, so it scares you. I'm certainly game to take you on with that bet of yours - I certainly will use the money, provided it is worth my while, and that you remember that 'music notation' provides for its own meta-typography, and even verbal instructions, regarding musical passages that cannot be "conventionally" scripted. That includes the use of symbols and drawings for when the effect is more important than the actual pitch or rhythm (see Penderecki, or for more extreme example, Logothetis).

    P.S.2: Will you please stop sharing your straw-fetish with me henceforth...


  • Erik, I think the days of just using one sample library for working writers is long gone. Actually, Symphobia has a great sound to it as I'm sure you'll agree. I hear VSL mixed with many other similar genre libraries all the time. I've had Symphobia for about 4 years maybe and never used it enough. I think what I'm going to do is some library music with many mixed sounds from VSL and others and see what it sounds like. I haven't done anything for a year since my Logic Desk broke down. But it's now been replaced. I can't sit there clicking with a mouse. I have to have a Logic Control Desk or it's a no go. Time to do some music.

    Just for fun - someone give me a style to write in. Not classical but more film like. NOT John Williams. That would be like copying my m- m- m- mother!  

    [O]


  • Yes of course I agree Paul, if I had enough in the bank I would purchase most of what there is in order to combine the best of all worlds, and not because I need someone else to orchestrate an augmented chord for me, but at least you are someone that has the background to understand my objections...


  • ... someone called me ...?


    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • last edited
    last edited

    @Dietz said:

    ... someone called me ...?

     

    Hey Hal, it's about time.  What's up with those pod bay doors dude.  It's a bit nippy out here so any time you want to open them... 


  • FROM DEVELOPER'S WEBSITE

    Be Original!

    ... With the included phrase and rhythm generators you can generate thousands of phrases based on your requirements. The Idea Tool will generate a multitrack composition the way you want. You just need to set the conditions and rules of the tool and press the "Generate" button. This application is an infinite source of inspiration (ed. yeah...), and soon you will be wondering how you could have ever worked without it (ed. you couldn't so you didn't/wouldn't).

    Music Interpretation

    Whenever you import a MIDI file or record from your keyboard, RapidComposer will analyse the notes, fill the master track with harmonies, and convert the notes to parametric representation (ed. woooww!!...). The advantage of separating the form and harmony is significant, e.g. you can play back a Bach piece using the chords of Hotel California! (ed. Damn!..) Or listen to your composition in another key, or with another chord progression. The possibilities are endless (ed. unlike yours...).

    ____________________________________________________

    (Sung to McCartney's and Jackson's old tune): "The song is mine.... No, no, no, no, no, the song is mine!" etc...

    P.S.:  Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept Deaf & Inept

    My favourite loop!! I made it myself!!!! Now I'll just have to run it through VapidComposer to harmonize it...


  •  civ3 -

    Sorry about that somewhat harsh post of mine.  Of course you aren't actually against notation!  I was responding to my delusional perceptions as usual.   Actually I agree with a lot of what you AND Errikos both say.  You are both fine musicians, just approaching things from two different directions I would say.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @civilization 3 said:

    I had a delusion for a very short time of being a classical soloist. I expected to get graded worse by that Henry Meyer, having the gall to play that one. Maybe he felt sorry for me. 

    I don't watch a lot of movies. I am watching the tv program "Fringe" now and I have found the music of this guy Giacchino quite distasteful. I think where he isn't strictly from pedestrian (or minimal) he's copying someone's score. Clever boy, but...

    I'm sure you could have been. 

    I was really enjoying Luck. And then they had to take it off after the first series because of health & safety re: the horses, unfortunately. I think the creator and original writer is David Milf. I like his work quite a bit. Very Shakesperean in his attitude and the actors always deliver very well in his TV creations.

    Giacchino may have done some music to Die Hard 4. I'm don't know without looking it up and I never look anything up unless it's to do with cameras or camera crews. He may have done the music to Lost (which was drivel - I lasted 2 shows) and something called Alcatraz, which definitely harks back to older times of TV. Just entertainment without having to think, which is fine sometimes. 

    I mean copying scores is quite common if you think about it. A lot of the time it's not really copying but 'sounding like' and a lot of that may have something to do with orchestration techniques and requiremnets made by producers/directors  - Aw man, I want it to sound just like that last Hans Zimmer movie' ect.


  • Hi Dietz,

    maybe it's time for a little software update...

    ... this would create a completely new meaning for the term "user control" [:^)]

    Cheers

    Klaus


  • [Y] *ROFL*


    /Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    P.S.1: You have a syndrome against notation. No one said it's perfect, but I think it is because you know ****-all about that as well, so it scares you. I'm certainly game to take you on with that bet of yours - I certainly will use the money, provided it is worth my while, and that you remember that 'music notation' provides for its own meta-typography, and even verbal instructions, regarding musical passages that cannot be "conventionally" scripted. That includes the use of symbols and drawings for when the effect is more important than the actual pitch or rhythm (see Penderecki, or for more extreme example, Logothetis).

    P.S.2: Will you please stop sharing your straw-fetish with me henceforth...

    No, your STRAWMAN has that problem. Your strawman must scare easy, too. 'In fact you know nothing about music'? This is truly desperate argumentation. It is just cyberbullying. You the man, though!
    Pathetic, desperate, JUVENILE behavior.

    notate this, then: accurately to the point I could get people to perform every pitch, every nuance of rhythm just so: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/18778361/25.%20SPACED.mp3

    As though a symphonic transcription. You can call any instrument whatever you like. I don't mean vague gestural symbols, I mean every note. Your assertion is 'notate every note or it isn't yours' is it not? Good_luck.

    go ahead and bet the farm.

    PS: your entire content here sums to 'you're stupid, therefore your points are invalid'. In a thread that announces to the community you require people you don't know to be inept and deaf, in order to seem superior, it's a great fit.

    "I'm greatly surprised to see PaulR is even bothering with you..." Well, you sure are. [Y]


  • last edited
    last edited

    @civilization 3 said:

    I had a delusion for a very short time of being a classical soloist. I expected to get graded worse by that Henry Meyer, having the gall to play that one. Maybe he felt sorry for me. 

    I don't watch a lot of movies. I am watching the tv program "Fringe" now and I have found the music of this guy Giacchino quite distasteful. I think where he isn't strictly from pedestrian (or minimal) he's copying someone's score. Clever boy, but...

    I'm sure you could have been. 

    I was really enjoying Luck. And then they had to take it off after the first series because of health & safety re: the horses, unfortunately. I think the creator and original writer is David Milf. I like his work quite a bit. Very Shakesperean in his attitude and the actors always deliver very well in his TV creations.

    Giacchino may have done some music to Die Hard 4. I'm don't know without looking it up and I never look anything up unless it's to do with cameras or camera crews. He may have done the music to Lost (which was drivel - I lasted 2 shows) and something called Alcatraz, which definitely harks back to older times of TV. Just entertainment without having to think, which is fine sometimes. 

    I mean copying scores is quite common if you think about it. A lot of the time it's not really copying but 'sounding like' and a lot of that may have something to do with orchestration techniques and requiremnets made by producers/directors  - Aw man, I want it to sound just like that last Hans Zimmer movie' ect.

    I may be being unfair to Mr Giacchino. I tried to watch that Star Trek picture and the music took me out of it to the extent I had to bolt, and I looked it up. He's a very Hollywood type, the best schmoozer in the biz, you know. But in Fringe, I noticed this: the first season the credits for the score are restricted to his name. A lot of it really sooked. There is this one thing someone is using a lot that I like, a dissonant brass cluster that bends. Using an awful lot. to the point of distraction for me. But there is at the same time this ham-handed romantic style and music that is quite moving. It seems like two people.

    Later, I think the second season, you see two names, Giacchino and one Chris Tilton. I didn't see that at first but I had gotten to think more of the good music was prevailing.

    Sometime later, the credits have Tilton's name first. I get the impression Giacchino's the name, and the boss, until it's not the name, as the evidence is overwhelming or Mr Tilton spoke up in some fashion. By this time the music is mostly truly brilliant.

    Worst TV theme ever, written by the producer JJ Abrams. Who seems to want to employ Giacchino.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @civilization 3 said:

    notate this, then: accurately to the point I could get people to perform every pitch, every nuance of rhythm just so: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/18778361/25.%20SPACED.mp3

    This is an electronic-music track you MORON!! [Sorry, this is a polite forum.] You don't notate that!! What does it have to do with orchestral/symphonic music, or even its virtualization (even if there are instrumental samples in this)?!?!? Symphonic, orchestral, instrumental (what else do I call it?!) music is and always has been my preoccupation here - whether you could "get" that or not...(well, 'not', as it happened). Be that as it may, a lot of what is in the foreground and some parts in the background are perfectly notatable, especially when you allow for glissando lines and some modern notation. Can't you tell??

    However, and I don't know whether the track is yours, I was doing stuff like that during my first year at university for my Electronic Composition major (in my 2nd year I did better of course). This isn't to say "I am a better composer than you"; it is to tell you that I know what's involved, and I used to know (it's been decades almost) how to build something like that from scratch (from just a sine wave) through writing code, instead of using ready-made sounds and just tweaking them... Why am I saying all this? You always - arrogantly - assert that all I understand (or like) is dated, dead music, and that I'm reactionary to anything that isn't that and - allegedly - challenges me.

    That's how much you know about music and about me... I have admitted that you know much more in terms of studio set-up and machines and softwares talking to one another through cables and the ether; in short, that you are a superior studio technician to me. I never meant that you could approximate my knowledge in the actual creative aspects of academic electronic music (yes, I don't mean head-bobbing DJ crap, to which I am blissfully indifferent). Just because I prefer to write for acoustic instruments it doesn't mean that I am ignorant of other musical areas; I just have my preferences, and of course my own opinions regarding their worth (my prerogative, as is yours when dismissing all the classics).

    I am not going to address anything else, as my debating skills have been proven time and again to be far above and beyond anything you could ever comprehend. Enjoy your meek ignorance and writing your straw-inspired tracks.

    ADDENDUM: It occurred to me that you might think you have proven your point regarding a perceivable incongruity - false as it happens - between my signature and what I am saying above; i.e. that there is in fact music that can be one's own, without the possibility/need of traditionally notating it. NO! I also put MIDI in my signature, which is a broad way of saying that in any case, one has to be responsible for every - or as many as possible - musical event(s) in one's own composition, even if the music is the result of an algorithmic/mathematical/controlled-indeterminacy process (also encompassing in that way serious electronic composition). One has to be able to either notate, play, or program/generate as much of the musical material as possible, by oneself. If orks just collate block musical phrases and chunks that someone else came up with and recorded, and then just thatch(!!) them together with some puerile/insignificant materials of their own, then they are just deluding themselves, and damaging everybody else.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Pusteblumi said:

    Hi Dietz,

    maybe it's time for a little software update...

    ... this would create a completely new meaning for the term "user control"

    Cheers

    Klaus

    This I would find scary...behold the eye of the Sauron...[:-*]


  • last edited
    last edited

    @Errikos said:

    FROM DEVELOPER'S WEBSITE

    Whenever you import a MIDI file or record from your keyboard, RapidComposer will analyse the notes, fill the master track with harmonies, and convert the notes to parametric representation (ed. woooww!!...). The advantage of separating the form and harmony is significant, e.g. you can play back a Bach piece using the chords of Hotel California! (ed. Damn!..)

    Now, this really is abysmal...

    ...our author probably ment to say "...of separating the melody and the harmony...", but he also seems to be blissfully ignorant of the fact that different harmony can substantially change the percieved form of the piece, that is, that form and harmony cannot be arbitrarily separated, as the harmony happens to be constitutive to how we percieve the form...