Hi Dietz—

Could you elaborate a bit on the proper use of compression in this context (or any context—I’m quite ignorant about this)? It’s been my very limited experience that compression can sometimes make certain instruments actually sound even more prominent (louder) in a mix. What sort of settings would you recommend I use to “tame” the solo parts so they don’t sound too large in comparison to the strings? If there’s already a thread on this subject could you post a link?

Many thanks,
Jay

Jay, this is simply very beautiful. GREAT JOB!

Your dynamic perfomance is outstanding. It would be great to have a look in your midi file.

What made you choose GOS for sordino strings?

I understand your point about hiding the violins. EQ-wise try to dampen the trebles a bit (beyond say 8 kHz) and push a bit around 400 Hz, maybe this helps a bit. What articulations did you use for violins? Sometimes I thought a more kind of sfz attack could help. Perfomance articulations are not always the best choice, I found.

The Panteon is really flexible reverb and there are several possibilities to get a darker sound, most common of course the locut filter (or hidamp). This simply cuts of trebles. But the interesting part of this reverb begins when you fiddle around with density and spread parameters and predelays. Did you read the manual? I found it quite informative. Especially that metallic character you should get rid of with adjusting these parameters.
Instead of just send less violins in the reverb try different reverbs for the different instrument groups, so don´t be shy with Panteon instances. I sometimes have altogether seven or eight reverbs and ambience generators running.

Again, thank you very much for posting it, it was a real pleasure listening to it!
Bests,
- Mathis

@JBacal said:

Thanks for taking the time to listen. I hope you enjoy it. Best,
Jay

Very enjoyable to listen to. Must take you ages to do something like this Jay! Thank you for sharing this. Well done! [:)]

@JBacal said:

Hi Dietz?

Could you elaborate a bit on the proper use of compression in this context (or any context?I?m quite ignorant about this)? It?s been my very limited experience that compression can sometimes make certain instruments actually sound even more prominent (louder) in a mix. What sort of settings would you recommend I use to ?tame? the solo parts so they don?t sound too large in comparison to the strings? If there?s already a thread on this subject could you post a link?

Many thanks,
Jay

Jay, our Mixing- And PostPro-Forum should contain quite a few threads on this (and related) topics.

HTH,

/Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library

Mathis—

Thanks for your tips on EQ and reverb. I will read the Pantheon manual and try fooling around with the controls you suggest.

Originally, I wanted to use only VSL products, but the con sordino strings in Opus 1 have a lot of “detail” and the violas have a lot of high-pitched overtones that I didn’t want. There is probably a way to EQ them to create a smoother and softer sound, but unfortunately I don’t really have the mixing skills yet. The GOS con sordino strings were closer to what I wanted out of the box, so I went with them.

I agree that I should have tried using more articulations for the strings. This was partially out of laziness and partially because con sordino strings in the libraries I own have a limited number of articulations. Also I only have 1 computer and 768 MB of ram so I generally try to limit the number of articulations I use so that I can hear as many of the instruments simultaneously as possible. This makes balancing the instruments against each other a lot easier. I created some pseudo sfx articulations with CC #11, but I know they’re a poor substitute for the real thing. Next time I’ll go the extra mile and use more articulations.

I’ll try to post the midi file soon.

Best,
Jay

@JBacal said:

If anyone’s interested I can post the midi (or Cakewalk) file so they can see exactly what’s going on.

I, for one, would love to see the MIDI file, as I am still in the early stages of trying to learn how to use VSL.

Best DG

Here's the midi file.

http://hometown.aol.com/jbacal/music/Pavane.mid">http://hometown.aol.com/jbacal/music/Pavane.mid

If anyone has questions about it, don't hesitate.


--Jay

@JBacal said:

Here's the midi file.

http://hometown.aol.com/jbacal/music/Pavane.mid">http://hometown.aol.com/jbacal/music/Pavane.mid

If anyone has questions about it, don't hesitate.


--Jay

Thanks; I'll have a look at it over the weekend, when everyone else is enjoying the sun [:(]

DG

NOTE: Almost all patches in Pavane mock-up are multilayer multi-dynamic modwheel crossfade legato performance instruments (except for harp, pizz strings and string harmonics). Please see Mother Goose thread for details about creating many of these multi-dynamic modwheel performance patches.


--Jay

Very good indeed Jay, very well put together. You beat me at it ! [:@] [:D]
I've started a version of that beautiful piece myself a while back as a pet project to learn the VSL and get inside Ravel's orchestration and writing. I've only done the first 20 bars so far...

A few minor comments in terms of accuracy with the score. I find the solo horn in the opening a bit too present. it should be more delicate. It's marked pp and in your version it sounds more like mf. It's not only a mix thing it's also the timbre itself. Not sure if you have a pp solo horn on the Opus.
The very first harp gliss seems a bit late to me. Overall your tempi seem a tad too slow. Don't take me wrong your rendition is very musical and sounds fine but these are a few things I noticed that may not be faithful to Ravel's score.

You are now in the club of the distinguished VSL masters!

=m=a=r=c=

Hi Marc—

You’re correct about the French horn. It’s a custom modwheel combination of pand mf legato performance layers. I felt that adding the mf layer made the passage more expressive and more “French horn-like.” I probably went too far.

The tempo is indeed in large part slower than the score indicates. But William encouraged me to take more liberties with tempi, and so I did. I’ve actually heard recordings that are even much slower than this. It’s hard to know what’s “right.”

I’m not too knowledgeable about the realization of harp glissandi. I’ll have to listen more closely to my actual recordings and hear how a real harpist does this.

Most importantly, please finish your version and post it! I for one would be very interested to hear someone else’s solutions to the same technical problems as well as someone else’s musical interpretation of this gorgeous music. I think this would be very interesting and educational. And besides, you can never hear too many versions of this beautiful piece!

Best,
Jay

I chose that piece because it was short! It still feels like a gigantic tasks to do a midi mockup of it with the VSL. I' ll see if I can do a few bars every day, it will stll take me a while. How much time do you think you spent on it?
In any case I really doubt I can do as good as you did. [:)]

=m=a=r=c=

Marc B,

I worked on the piece off and on over a period of about 10 days. Hopefully, future pieces will go faster for me with more experience. And if I win the lottery, a second or third computer will also help. For example, I would balance the woodwinds and then "lock" them in by creating an audio track. But then after hearing them in context with the strings I would want to change something about the woodwinds or change the tempo and so I would have to redo the ALL the woodwinds again and then create a new audio track. This was frustrating and time consuming. If I could keep all the instruments and articulations in midi until the final mix, this would save a lot of time and yield a better end result as well.


--Jay

Marc,

I just relistened to the first harp gliss and you're right, it is more than late, it's in the wrong place! The gliss must have gotten accidentally shifted a couple of beats in my sequencer. Oops! I'll have to fix that. Thanks for noticing.

--Jay

No worries Jay, it did not sound at the wrong place because you would have heard it. I felt bad pointing those minor points when the whole was so masterfully put together. Glad you did welcome my feedback!

=m=a=r=c=

Wow! This demo is beautiful! I told alot of my freinds to visit this site to listen to this demo and the 'La Mer' demo. Just amazing what the VSL can do, isn't it! My freinds listened to these demos and some became discouraged that they were going to lose their jobs as musicians to this technology. I don't think that will happen though,
-Julie

Jay-
Sorry to trouble you, but I am trying to learn from your demo. I opened it in Cubase and see a bunch of instruments that I don't know. What is 'solo double', and 'ambient'? Will you give a list of the 'score order' of your mockup? I would like to know exactly what you are doing here so there are no secrets. [:)] It is really so good, and would help me a great deal. But, I also understand that you are busy and may not be able to do this. Either way, thanks very much for the demo and midi file.
Julie

Hi Julie,

I’m honored to help if I can. The “Solo double” instruments are solo instruments that I used to double ensemble instruments in order to give them more “individual” character. The “ambient” track is an ambient noise sample included with GOS (Garritan Orchestral Strings). It adds a subtle layer of coughs, chair squeaks, paper rustling, etc.

Here’s a complete list of tracks in my midi mock-up and the names of the actual samples I used. If you have any more questions don’t hesitate to ask. I’m happy to reveal all my “secrets.”

Best,
Jay

Flute 1 – OPUS 1 FL1_perf-leg_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO (custom patch that combines both p and f performance legato layers – see the "Ma Mere L'Oye" thread for the .art files to create this)
Flute 2 – OPUS 1 FL1_perf-leg_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO

Oboe – Miroslav OB LN ST (but I’m sure new VSL Horizon oboe will be even better!)

Clarinet 1 -- OPUS 1 KLB_perf-leg_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO (custom patch)
Clarinet 2 -- OPUS 1 KLB_perf-leg_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO

Bassoons -- OPUS 1 FA_perf-leg_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO (custom patch)
Bassoons 2 -- OPUS 1 FA_perf-leg_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO
Bassoons long notes -- OPUS 1 FA_pV_sus

Solo Horn -- OPUS 1 HO_perf-leg_p-mf_2Lay-MOD MONO (custom patch)
Horn 2 -- OPUS 1 HO_perf-leg_p-mf_2Lay-MOD MONO

Sordino Violins -- GOS 1st Vln WARM Sordino EXP
Violins pizz -- OPUS 1 Vln-14_pz-sl
Sordino 2nd Violins -- GOS 1st Vln WARM Sordino EXP
Sordino Violas -- GOS Vla WARM Sordino EXP
Violas pizz -- OPUS 1 VA-10_pz-sl
Sordino Cellos -- GOS Cellos WARM Sordino EXP
Cellos pizz -- OPUS 1 VC-8_pz-sl
Sordino Double Basses -- OPUS 1 KB-6L_sus_2Lay-mod
Bass pizz -- OPUS 1 KB-6_pz-sl

Harp harmonics -- OPUS 1 HA_flageolette
Harp -- OPUS 1 HA_normal

Violins Harmonics – GOS 1st Vln Harmonics 1
Violas Harmonics – Vla Harmonics

Violins Solo Double -- Horizon Solo Strings Vl_perf-det_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO (custom patch)
2nd violins solo double -- Horizon Solo Strings Vl_perf-det_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO (custom patch)
Violas solo double -- Horizon Solo Strings VA_perf-leg_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO (custom patch)
Cellos solo double -- Horizon Solo Strings VC_perf-leg_p-f_2Lay-MOD MONO (custom patch)

Ambient -- GOS Ambient Noise (C3, D3, E3, F3, G3)

Very impressive work, indeed. I agree with pretty much all the points made, so really nothing much to add. But I've been wondering whether anybody has found "Ambient" samples anywhere other than GOS? They really add a great deal to the "live" mood of it, so I'd love to get my hands on some... Or, if anybody has any tips on how one might fake an ambient track, it would be much appreciated.

J.

Jay-
Thank you so much for sharing the instrument list. I will try it right now! I really appreciate it, and will learn alot from it. For the doubles, are they EXACTLY the same midi track, or are they slightly changed to avoid phasing problems? Or would you only hear phasing problems with exactly the same patch doubled?
Great job,
-Julie