I'm actually doing something similar right now. I'm having to work only from my Macbook Pro so I had to cut down how many reverbs I could use. So right now I have 1 instance of Altiverb .. using the TODD AO set .. although this time there's no fancy routing .. it's just Altiverb at the end of the routing and I'm using the Speaker placement to determine how much dry signal comes though.
.
The sound is actually quite pleasing .. as if it's in the stage that the IR's come from. Only problem is that of course it now needs another reverb on top to give it a more 'produced' feel. But this is a pretty good problem to have. Cos otherwise the stereo width .. EQ .. and all else sounds pretty good. So I would say one can work this way .. using AV to give an overall 'real room' impression .. and then using your favourite artificial reverb to give more essence to the tail.
-
Hi Hetoreyn,
Interesting! The Todd AO Stage is the exact IR setting I'm considering for this stategy. However, it would be nice to have an A/B comparison.
This is what I'm imagining:
A: Altiverb instances only with the reverb knob turned beyond 100% to give it nice amount of tail something like 125% or more (i.e. "enough to simulate the produced sound just using Altiverb").
B: Same amount of Altiverb instances as test A, but with the reverb knob set to 100% or a little less (also, as I mentioned before...keep the tail engaged in your Altiverb instances). Then run that output through a "good" hardware reverb (or suitable plug-in) to add the extra bit of tail (i.e. "the produced sound").
Now, which would sound BETTER? Would there be a clear winner, or is it just a toss-up? If I could afford a Bricasti M7, I'm guessing that scenerio B is how I would use it with VSL.
Brian
-
Hi All,
I just discovered that Altiverb sampled a Lexicon 480. Though this is no substitute for a great hardware reverb, I think it's an acceptable solution for a plug-in outbound reverb that approximates the use of hardware without having to buy something new if you already own Altiverb. Here are the settings I'm using for the outbound portion, as the room portion is Altiverb Todd AO. I think it sounds better than extending the Reverb Time on Todd AO instances. I should do an A/B comparison, but I want to first post my Todd AO template with a decent audio test to see if I'm approaching this the right way
Brian
-
Interesting Brian. I hadn't considered this 'sampled' 480 (just thinking it would never even get close to the real McCoy) - but admittedly I hadn't even tried it.
I use Wizoo's W2 on the an FX bus in Cubase to wash over everything after either Todd AO (or Fox - which I have been liking better on denser material). I really like those results but will try this ASAP.
Anyone else tried this with Fox or Todd AO?
Rob
-
Hey Brian (others using scoring stages)
This Lexicon 480 is quite good. Thanks for the tip.
Rob
(Brian - noticed that you had the 'EQ' activated in the instance of AV - did you roll off the lows on the 480 to prevent mud on the final mix? Seems to have worked nicely here.)
-
Hi Rob,
Yes, I did roll off the lows on the 480, it helps. Thanks for the reply to this thread! I didn't know Audio Ease had sampled the Fox scoring stage...thanks for that tip! I think the 480 is pretty good for me because I don't really want to buy any new hardware or software at the moment. I have heard good things about Wizoo's W2 though.
Brian
-
Hi
Yes, this is exactly what I do. I have altiverbs for the room, one for each depth. Then I run the TC Powercore with VSS3 for the additional reverb, I really do think it adds that little bit extra polished feel to it. Also added the TC Powercore finalizer or if you can afford it the MD3 on the master channel really helps in the mastering process.
-
Thanks Simsy!
If you don't mind me asking, which powercore hardware do you own?
Glad to hear that you have good experiences with the VSS3. To be honest what I really want is a Bricasti, but I can't afford it so I'm trying to decide if I go cheaper, would it be worth the expense...or just deal with Altiverb while saving my pennies and maybe in a few years get a Bricasti.
The MD3 is also big draw to the powercore for me, but I'd be curious to see how it compares to the Vienna Suite mastering plug-ins? I really like the Vienna Suite package, but if the MD3 sounds better, I'd rather spend $1500 on it then $500 on Vienna Suite. Then again, if there isn't that much difference (since the MD3 powercore is ported from the system 6000, and is not the actual system 6000) I'd rather save a $1000 and go with the Vienna Suite.
Anyway, sorry to unload all the stuff that has been swimming around in my brain! [:P]
Thanks. Brian
-
I remember 15 years ago chaining together two reverbs all the time (PCM 70, TC, etc.) to get a smoother, more 'expensive" sound. This worked real well with the cheap to mid-priced units of the day, as the studio I was working at didn't have the 480L or something similar.
So needless to say I still do this with the software verbs as well. Very effective, IMO.
Clark
-
Interesting idea Clark - worth trying - just wondering if the 'mud' builds up. Have you tried the new Acousticas Lex 300 IR - very smooth - especially 2.6- and higher tails.
Rob