Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

181,658 users have contributed to 42,178 threads and 254,544 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 1 new thread(s), 2 new post(s) and 49 new user(s).

  • Vienna Server/VE3 maximum RAM load?

    How much RAM/VE3 instances are folks able to load into the Vienna Ensemble Service? Right now mine quits after 2.75 gigs within three instances of VE3, even though I have another 8-10 gigs of free RAM still available. I know the VSL guys have reported much better results. Is there a way around this? Jason

  • last edited
    last edited

    @jasongravesmusic said:

    How much RAM/VE3 instances are folks able to load into the Vienna Ensemble Service? Right now mine quits after 2.75 gigs within three instances of VE3, even though I have another 8-10 gigs of free RAM still available. I know the VSL guys have reported much better results. Is there a way around this? Jason

    It depends on your OS. What OS are you using?

    DG


  • Mac OS 10.5.2

  • last edited
    last edited

    @jasongravesmusic said:

    Mac OS 10.5.2

    That's your answer then. There are no 64bit versions of VE for OSX yet, hence the RAM limit.

    DG


  • So can I somehow run multiple instances of the Server to access more RAM? As it stands now I was better off, performance-wise, running individual instances of VE2 on my host machine. What is VSL referring to about making duplicate copies in the manual for Mac folks (pg 9)? Is that for standalone on the host computer or for the slave? Thanks! Jason

  • last edited
    last edited

    @jasongravesmusic said:

    So can I somehow run multiple instances of the Server to access more RAM? As it stands now I was better off, performance-wise, running individual instances of VE2 on my host machine. What is VSL referring to about making duplicate copies in the manual for Mac folks (pg 9)? Is that for standalone on the host computer or for the slave? Thanks! Jason

    I'm afraid that you'll have to wait for one of the Mac users on this forum to help you further, as I use Windows XP.

    DG


  • Thanks, man. I'm also talking to Ilio tech support and will post my results.

  • I have exactly the same problem as you do. I've worked through this very methodically and the fact remains exactly as you state it:

    VE3 when run as a network application as a plug-in within a DAW can only address a total of 3 gigs of samples single computer. 

    Multiple instances within the networked version do not increase the amount of RAM you can address on a single machine. 

    Multiple instances of VE2, when run as a standalone, can address more RAM on a single computer than VE3 as a networked plugin.

    These are the facts. I don't know if this is a 32bit OS issue. Comments, anyone?

    VE3, to be successful, will need to address more RAM, or the licensing approach must be adjusted to accomodate the need to spread a library over mulotiple slave computers. We cannot buy multiple full licenses for every collection to use them in a networked setup. The solo strings library, for example, seems a perfect candidate for the potential of VE3. But with the restriction that the license cannot be shared across the two machines, and each machine cannot address more than 3 gigs of samples, this dream evaporates. It was a beautiful dream, I might add, and it's one that only the amazing VSL could ever have given us.

    The best solution available to Mac Users right now is a Mac Pro with 16 or more gigs of RAM running multiple instances of VE2. I cannot find my way past these conclusions.

    Thoughts anyone?

    Fitz 


  • Fitz, the best solution for using the plugin version of VE3is XP64 or Vista64, no matter what your computer. When VE3 is 64bit on OSX, then that will be an equally good solution.

    DG


  • OK DG, then here's a question. My Daw is a Mac (Digital Performer). Can VE3 running on my Mac in OSX connect to VE3 server slave Mac Pro running Vista? Fitz

  • Fitz:

    According to the folks at VSL you can run your DAW on OSX on one machine and VE3 on any other machine (including a Mac Pro) running XP Pro 64 or Vista 64. As DG says, when there is a 64-bit OSX compatible version of VE 3, then you will be able to do the same thing with a MacPro running Leopard.

    One of the features of VE3 is, obviously, that the slave computer does not need to have an audio or MIDI interface - - since it receives MIDI from and  sends audio back to the DAW via ethernet. It seems likely that the cost of Vista 64 will be less than that of a MIDI and an audio interface - - which would be necessary if you were to run multiple instances of VE2 on the slave under OSX. Another limitation of the multiple VE2 scheme is that, according to the folks at VSL, you can run only three VE2 standalones - - each with about 2.5GB of samples on a MacPro running OSX.  This still leaves you with a lot of unused RAM if you have 16GB or more.

    There is one additional complication: OSX can read disks formatted for Windows but Windows cannot read disks formatted for OSX. This means that, if your sample libraries are on Mac formatted drives, to use VE3 under Vista 64 or XP Pro 64, you will have to copy the libraries to a Windows formatted drive or drives or reformat your current library drives as Windows drives and reinstall the samples. The good news is that, according to CM, a MacPro running OSX can stream samples from Windows formatted drives - - so when an OSX compatible 64-bit version of VE3 is released, you will not, theoretically, be compelled to repeat this process in reverse.


  • last edited
    last edited

    @fitzpatton_14145 said:

    OK DG, then here's a question. My Daw is a Mac (Digital Performer). Can VE3 running on my Mac in OSX connect to VE3 server slave Mac Pro running Vista? Fitz

    I agree with the above post. It seems the simplest solution for you, and if you want to run in Leopard when VE is 64bit on OSX, then you have the choice. It will certainly be interesting to compare which OS is best for sample streaming, and whether the potential crackle/pop situation, on first playing of your piece, that sometimes appears on OSX, is eliminated when using VE3.

    One further thought. I've just bought a few copies of XP64, which were relatively cheap (OEM), as I bought some hard drives at the same time. I believe that as the current wisdom is not to sell your first born in order to buy RAM and hard drives from Apple, you might be able to get a very good deal on either XP64 or Vista.

    DG


  • last edited
    last edited

    @stevesong said:

    according to CM, a MacPro running OSX can stream samples from Windows formatted drives

    the most important thing is: as performant as from an HFS+ formatted drive ....

    the drawback is: OS X can not write to NTFS formatted drives (though there are free tools available to make that work too)

    whenever i need to read HFS+ formatted drives on windows systems i use MacDrive, but for this we have to wait for a 64bit and VISTA compatible version

    christian

     

    ps: for the newer mac users: HFS+ is a filesystem which apple now calls *mac-formatted* and for storing sample data one should always choose *not journaled*


    and remember: only a CRAY can run an endless loop in just three seconds.