Anyone of your 'courageous' ones tried this latest version???
A very timid Rob Elliott [:O]ops:
A very timid Rob Elliott [:O]ops:
-
Rob-- I was wondering the same thing. I got 5.0.5.0 loaded, and all *seemed* to be fine-- then I go out of town for a few days and discover that within 24 hours that versions have come and gone rather conspicuously.
I do find this very troubling, especially when the new and improved 5.0.6.1 seems to have caused one user a problem already. [*-)]
The mere exodus of two versions in such a short time indicates that one set of problems continues to be exchanged for different set of problems.
It feels odd to have the now defunct 5.0.5.0 still running, but until I hear otherwise or until 5.0.5.0 totally falls apart on me, I'm going to hold my ground until further reports come in.
-
@JWL said:
Rob-- I was wondering the same thing. I got 5.0.5.0 loaded, and all *seemed* to be fine-- then I go out of town for a few days and discover that within 24 hours that versions have come and gone rather conspicuously.
I do find this very troubling, especially when the new and improved 5.0.6.1 seems to have caused one user a problem already. [*-)]
The mere exodus of two versions in such a short time indicates that one set of problems continues to be exchanged for different set of problems.
It feels odd to have the now defunct 5.0.5.0 still running, but until I hear otherwise or until 5.0.5.0 totally falls apart on me, I'm going to hold my ground until further reports come in.
I am on 4.9.x and staying there!!! Longer loading times at least allow me to work. My clients could care less that the protection software of my sample library is having its issues - don't you know [:'(] (the clients have little or no empathy). However as another poster has said, waiting to load up cues with a director and producer sitting in here - can be frustrating. There's only so much talking about the weather one can do. [[;)]]
Hopefully Syncrosoft will get their act together - until then I am staying with what works.
Rob
-
@Austin Haynes said:
There is now a 5.0.6.2 on Syncrosofts website. I tried it out yesterday and i haven't experienced any issues as of yet. [H]
Austin - you are a braver man than I [:D]
Thanks for the report. Any faster load times Austin?
Rob
-
For the record:
I installed v 5.0.6.2 yesterday
I launched it and got a strange and disturbing error message. I supressed panic and restarted my Mac, and License Control Center opened perfectly and found all my stuff.
No other problems so far....in fact, here's the great news:
With all 10 VI's on my system, it used to take around 8 minutes to open the VI standalone.
Now - - - I had to log out and back in and do it again because I thought I was dreaming - - - 1 (ONE) minute!!!!!
Brave new world!
Regards - Colin
-
@musos said:
For the record:
I installed v 5.0.6.2 yesterday
I launched it and got a strange and disturbing error message. I supressed panic and restarted my Mac, and License Control Center opened perfectly and found all my stuff.
No other problems so far....in fact, here's the great news:
With all 10 VI's on my system, it used to take around 8 minutes to open the VI standalone.
Now - - - I had to log out and back in and do it again because I thought I was dreaming - - - 1 (ONE) minute!!!!!
Brave new world!
Regards - Colin
Colin - you are making me want to be brave, but, er, I don't know.... [8-)]
-
@JWL said:
Rob:
I will if you will, if that's any consolation...
After all, what would you attempt if you knew you could not fail? [:P]
Ok - if you put it that way - first thing in the morning - for now its off to spend time with humans [[;)]]
Rob
-
please don't forget to re-boot after installing something ... OSX (as a UNIX-like system) keeps running processes in memory and re-reads the updated files only after all instances of an application are removed from memory.
best choice would be to reboot before and after an update to make sure all conditions apply.
so strange behaviour of a more complex program after an update without a reboot shouldn't take you wonder ...
christian
and remember: only a CRAY can run an endless loop in just three seconds. -
@JWL said:
Rob:
I will if you will, if that's any consolation...
After all, what would you attempt if you knew you could not fail? [:P]
Ok - if you put it that way - first thing in the morning - for now its off to spend time with humans [[;)]]
Rob
Did the update-- and did 5-6 reboots before Syncrosoft kicked in. It's working okay-- no appreciable difference from 5.0.5.0.
Oh-- I had to totally dump my Directory Manager and reload it, too.
-
Hi,
made the updates, first loading time is still about 5 minutes, the rest is fast, as it was already in the last version.
(G5 DP2.5, 4.5 GB Ram, 10.4.7)
Hope it will get faster...5minutes still a long time, specially when clients are beside you & waiting.
Greets:
HTF
-
Hi,
made the updates, first loading time is still about 5 minutes, the rest is fast, as it was already in the last version.
(G5 DP2.5, 4.5 GB Ram, 10.4.7)
Hope it will get faster...5minutes still a long time, specially when clients are beside you & waiting.
Greets:
HTF
I also have similar results with the latest. With 2.6 gig of samples - it takes about 5 minutes on all four slaves.
Rob
-
It wold be useful for users to report start times for the VI standalone or AU with no samples loaded (first instance initialisation) then there can be a clearer comparison.
The sample header load time though equally important is not, i suspect, affected by the recent VI and Synchrosoft updates.
VSL are stating initialisation times of 50-60 seconds - mine are currently 2:30 as an AU 1:50 as a standalone. (G5 2.5 dual OSX 10.4.7 , Logic 7.2.1.
Julian
