Vienna Symphonic Library Forum
Forum Statistics

199,670 users have contributed to 43,184 threads and 258,998 posts.

In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 6 new post(s) and 50 new user(s).

  • Orchestral Composition Contest - $1,200 Prize

    Whatever stupendous product is coming on Nov. 26 will undoubtedly cost a pretty chunk of change. If you'd like a shot at winning $1,200 to help pay for it, please consider entering the First Annual Fauxharmonic Orchestral Composition Contest.

    information

    Site: http://www.fauxharmonic.com
    Contest Poster (PDF): http://www.fauxharmonic.com/contest_poster.pdf

    Eligibility
    There are no restrictions regarding the age, nationality, state of residence or gender of the applicant.

    Instrumentation
    Standard orchestra or smaller (3333, 4331, timpani, percussion, keyboard, harp, and strings). Condensed scores or sketches and scores that include soloists or extra instruments will not be considered.

    Duration
    Compositions should not exceed 12 minutes in duration.

    Materials
    Send one full score with an optional corresponding cassette tape or compact disc recording of the work (MIDI realizations are acceptable).

    The composer’s name must not appear on any of the submission materials.

    A sealed, unmarked envelope containing the composer’s name, address, phone number and email address must be attached to the score.

    Fee
    There is a non-refundable entry fee of US$20 per composition entered. Make checks or international money orders payable to:
    The Fauxharmonic Orchestra LLC

    Deadline
    Applications must be received by
    March 1, 2006

    Judges
    A panel of judges will be chosen by The Fauxharmonic Orchestra. Each judge will be a performing instrumentalist, conductor, or composer, and each will evaluate all scores separately and without knowing who composed the work. Judges will forward selected compositions to the conductor of The Fauxharmonic Orchestra, who will make the final decision. The judges will not provide entrants with written or verbal commentary.

    Where to Send Submissions

    The Fauxharmonic Orchestra
    800 Ridge Road
    Hamden, CT 06517
    USA

    Please email me with any questions ... and good luck!

    - Paul Smith
    http://www.fauxharmonic.com

  • Wonderful ... yet something else I can't enter ... seems somewhat mean to post this kind of competition on a 'SAMPLE LIBRARY!' based forum site. I know there's a few who can write real score but most of us are here because we can't! [:'(]

    I'd like to see a VSL competition, since we could all enter that one.

  • last edited
    last edited

    @hetoreyn said:

    Wonderful ... yet something else I can't enter ... seems somewhat mean to post this kind of competition on a 'SAMPLE LIBRARY!' based forum site. I know there's a few who can write real score but most of us are here because we can't! [:'(]


    What makes you think that?

    DG

  • Well who'd bother buying an expensive sample library to exactly imitate real players if they could just take their music to a real orchestra!

    Or are you saying that everyone here except me can read and write score at a professioanl level!

  • Hetoreyn,
    Just to clear something up. There are many here who can read and write yes. But there are also pro's who can't, although they're a little thinner on the ground.
    And it's important to remember that even if we can read and write, unless we're in an orchestra or already 'popular', it's unlikely we'll hear our stuff played live, as most orchestral administrators these days tend to stick to the old favourites, and/or play film music excerpts. So pros who write are just as likely to use a sample library as those who don't, so they can hear what they've written. IMO sample libraries have released a lot of 'trained pros' from the frustration of never hearing their work played live. And in reality there is an irony in this. When you write and perform with a sample library and get it out to the public with resulting sales, the orchestral beaurocrats are more likely to play your stuff, particularly if it becomes popular, so the circle is reversed.
    And being able to play your own work the way you want to hear it provides a release from the restriction of being at the whim of others. (Generally non playing administrators. Hrumph!)

    Regards,

    Alex.

  • Fair enough, point taken [[;)]]

  • last edited
    last edited

    @hetoreyn said:

    Well who'd bother buying an expensive sample library to exactly imitate real players if they could just take their music to a real orchestra!


    Most people who hire me can't read a score, so I need to give them a reasonable demo of what the final sound is going to be. As for the library being expensive, it is probably the cheapest part of the "tools of my trade" [[:|]]

    DG

  • last edited
    last edited

    @hetoreyn said:

    Wonderful ... yet something else I can't enter ... seems somewhat mean to post this kind of competition on a 'SAMPLE LIBRARY!' based forum site. I know there's a few who can write real score but most of us are here because we can't! [:'(]

    I'd like to see a VSL competition, since we could all enter that one.


    Hetoreyn, I merely posted the contest notice here because it seemed to be the highest concentration of motivated orchestral composers I could find in one spot!

    If you'd like to enter the competion with no written score and JUST a midi realization, that would be acceptable, too. Just indicate that your MIDI file IS the score and there will be no semantic splitting of hairs, nor any detriment in judging your entry.

    - Paul H. Smith
    http://www.fauxharmonic.com

  • Okay, I think I'd like to submit someething. But in the instrumentation what does 3333, 4331 indicate. Is there a brass section?

    It's all new to me!

    Tah

    (PS, I apologise for my prickly post .... I really must avoid the message boards first thing in the morning [:O]ops: )

  • 3 Flutes (incl. piccolo)
    3 Oboes (incl. Eng. Horn)
    3 Clarinets (Incl. Bass Clarinet)
    3 Bassoons (Incl. Contrabassoon)

    4 Horns
    3 Trumpets
    3 Trombones
    1 Tuba

  • Are there restrictions to the complexity of the piece? Or the complexity in regards to individual parts (seeing you outruled soloists of any kind)?

    Thanks for mentioning it here!
    PolarBear

  • No restrictions on complexity. No soloists means, well, imagine a situation where you have a person standing in front of the orchestra (or sitting, as in the case of Yo Yo Ma) versus a situation where someone already in the orchestra plays a solo. The latter would be fine for this contest, but the former, concerto-like setting would not be accepted.

    - Paul

  • Hello:

    Hetoreyn: Like several others on these forums, I am a professional composer/orchestrator/arranger who has the good fortune of having a great deal of my music played by high quality orchestras or bands and even getting some of it recorded. Even so, I have purchased the VSL Pro and other libraries and a system to use them as have many serious musicians of whom I'm aware. You might be surprised at how many professionals welcome these products and use them extensively. I think it is a mistake to think that only people who don't read music will use the VSL and other such tools. Certainly they are a wonderful aid to people who have the music inside them yet haven't had the opportunity or desire to study traditionally. However, they are also extremely useful for professionals or those who have the traditional writing skills but no access to an orchestra. Even for professionals, usually the only music you get to hear played by a good orchestra is that which is commissioned for some specific reason. If you are writing art music, your great symphonic masterpiece [:D] or something you dreamed the other night, you are not likely to hear it and certainly not likely to get it recorded. Also, as hemitage mentioned, there is no better sales tool than these libraries. Non-musicians simply cannot get the idea from your score.

    Paul: Thanks for posting the contest info. You are likely correct about this being at least one place with a high concentration of composers all together. I hope I can submit something for it.

    Poppa

  • Very succinct and clear.

    I point I would add is that unlike Herr Beethoven, I certainly cannot hear the music in my head and so am in desperate needs of good quality libraries to help me calibrate when I am writing original stuff. It's pretty hard even to get amateur orchestras to try things out, so you do tend to be confined to hearing real stuff for commissions only.

    Having said that, I am thinking about a trip to Eastern Europe to hire an orchestra for a recording session. There are snippets on the forum on this. Anyone had good experiences?

    As for the fauxharmonic orchestra - it's a fantastic name. Now let me see if I can put something together!

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    I certainly cannot hear the music in my head


    I have a 'reverse' problem: I hear lots of things in my head but can't get t out fast enough (making me loose most of it). And to my dissapointment, I can't exactly pinpoint what notes I'm hearing, so when I do remember phrases, pieces or whatever, I waiste time (and consequently loose idea's) trying to figure out what notes it all were.

  • The contest looks appealing.
    I would like to have some clarification though, about those numbers for a standard orchestra. I saw them on the site: 3333 and 4331. Does this apply to the strings? What does it mean? [*-)]:
    Thanks!

  • last edited
    last edited

    @paulhenrysmith said:

    3 Flutes (incl. piccolo)
    3 Oboes (incl. Eng. Horn)
    3 Clarinets (Incl. Bass Clarinet)
    3 Bassoons (Incl. Contrabassoon)

    4 Horns
    3 Trumpets
    3 Trombones
    1 Tuba

  • Well, thank you! I overlooked your earlier post.

  • last edited
    last edited

    @Another User said:

    I certainly cannot hear the music in my head


    I have a 'reverse' problem: I hear lots of things in my head but can't get t out fast enough (making me loose most of it). And to my dissapointment, I can't exactly pinpoint what notes I'm hearing, so when I do remember phrases, pieces or whatever, I waiste time (and consequently loose idea's) trying to figure out what notes it all were.

    wellsdeckers:

    As I see it, you describe two problems.

    1. Remembering what you hear for some length of time.

    2. Getting what you hear out of your head and into the world.

    I also used to have this problem. All of my life I have heard massive amounts of music in my head 24 hours a day (since age 6) but I couldn't get it on to paper ( I am old so it was paper then). Always, it would be not quite right or sometimes not even close to right.

    Consider this: When you speak with someone or read a book or article, it's fairly easy to remember the main ideas there because you understand what you saw or heard. If an average person sees an interesting building or a computer program or a football game s/he can only remember so much but well trained professionals can remember many details because they understand what they are seeing. It's the same with music.

    This is the key and finding it changed my life! I was fortunate to get the opportunity for some very demanding musical training. It did not interfere with my creativity or confine my talents, it did not force me into directions I didn't want to go. It gave me freedom to express what was in my head because I began to understand it, to break it down and I eventually reached the point where I could just write down what I was hearing. Now, I can honestly say I'm almost never surprised when I hear the live version of what I have written. It is exactly what I heard in my head. The sound in my head is so clear that it's like a live band or orchestra is playing right in front of me. I can pick out the individual instruments, the notes and phrases, everything. This is one of the reasons it took me so long to get into computers and music. I didn't need to to hear what the music sounded like and the quality has only recently reached the level that it is becoming comparable to live music. It's not there yet but it's getting very good.

    If you have the option of getting to a good school or a private teacher I strongly recommend that you take it. For people who can already hear music it is vitally important. At the very minimum you need the following:

    1. Ear Training - This may be the most important thing of all for you. In my opinion you should make this the number 1 priority in your development. Not everyone is lucky enough to hear music in their heads. Because you can, you must train yourself to understand what you are hearing.

    2. Orchestration/Arranging - Many people would put Harmony before this and they are probably correct but, for me, Orchestration and Ear Training are the true keys for people who really hear the music already.

    3. Harmony and Advanced Harmony - The better you understand the components of music the easier it will be for you to remember and to translate what you are hearing.

    4. Composition - This is the skill and technique of taking what you hear and crafting into a piece that realizes all the potential in your ideas.

    There's much more, of course, and other people will have their own ideas but, IMO, these are the most essential basics for the issue you described.

    Of course, I don't know anything about your life so I don't know what is possible for you, what styles of music you are into or what you believe. But I am speaking from my own experience. If you can get the proper training and commit yourself to it, I truly believe it will change your musical life. It will show you how to take the gift you have inside and and bring it out into the world. Good luck!

    Sorry for such a long post but I felt very strongly about what you said.

    Be well,

    Poppa

  • Well Poppa, thanks for your suggestions.
    I will definately start with 'ear training' (just before the summer I had a very short period where I did succeed a little bit in getting ideas notated as I was hearing them, until my work consumed me).
    As a matter of fact, I'm strongly thinking about a 'carreer-change' since my a/v-editing work is taking too much of my painting and composing time, both of which are my true passions.
    But making a living has #1 priority so its not gonna be a fast nor easy process.

    But I'll start training my hearing... any exercises to be found on CD or something??

    Thanks again for your suggestions. [H]