@Banquo said:
...edit: and ''MiR'' !!!
Damn, they have been busy in Vienna.
This should be good!
Certainly no question of what is being released now - just how good it is and of course the cost!
Rob
189,942 users have contributed to 42,692 threads and 256,886 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 3 new thread(s), 10 new post(s) and 44 new user(s).
@Banquo said:
...edit: and ''MiR'' !!!
@Banquo said:
...edit: and ''MiR'' !!!
@Duncan S. said:
MIR is most definitely going to require its own machine, at least with current technological limitations. One simply can not work with that many IRs (several hundred at a time) while doing other tasks. Perhaps with the introduction of quad-core processors and the lifting of the RAM barrier we will see computers powerful enough to handle both MIR and a certain amount of, for lack of a better term, compositional elements, but for the moment I can't see it as feasible.
It's important to remember that MIR is not just a mix panel or reverb plugin, it's designed to serve as the primary front end for the VSL library. What, exactly, that will mean remains somewhat unclear - at least to me.
Dietz, please feel free to contradict me on any of this; I'm just rehashing what I've read.
Duncan
@Austin Haynes said:
If MIR *requires* a computer just for it's purposes then is it assumed that one has to have more than one computer to properly use Symphonic Cube? I hope this is not the case....
@Christian Marcussen said:
What is scary is how expenssive this will be... but whats equally or more scary is how expenssive it will be in terms of new computers, cables, soundcards and mixers to get everything connected.
@Christian Marcussen said:
What is scary is how expenssive this will be... but whats equally or more scary is how expenssive it will be in terms of new computers, cables, soundcards and mixers to get everything connected.