Flautando is only included in the Pro Edition String module.
I'll have a look at the muted brass part.
best
Herb
I'll have a look at the muted brass part.
best
Herb
201,563 users have contributed to 43,250 threads and 259,300 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 1 new thread(s), 2 new post(s) and 57 new user(s).
@dpcon said:
Dietz,
Totally convincing ambiance in the Mahler. How did you manage that?
Dave Connor
@Dietz said:
Instruments that seem too "near" (harp, piatti and the like) got a dedicated TrueVerb for additional ER-information.
@herb said:
portamento and Schindler:
that's interesting, because I think Perlmann did this exactly to get different timbres. He always performed the first of the two repetitiv intervall changes on the same string (with portamento - it's much easier to play with portamento), the second on 2 different strings (without portamento).
So he does more or less the same we do, avoiding repetitiv sounding passages.
Dance macabre:
Only a few notes of that part passage do have vibrato, and I used them to get more randomness in this repetitiv passage. There are a lot of nonvibrato patches in the soloviolin, and I used all of them, but I wanted more different options.
Personally I realy don't care about such issues. If it sounds convincing to me, it's OK for me.
best
Herb
[...]
Dietz,
You used the same impulse? What parameter(s) did you change for the three busses? Pre-delay only? Or did you also tweak the EQ-curves?
Peter
@PaulR said:
Jesus Daryl, I sometimes wonder what's going on in your head. These are SAMPLES for Christ Sake. It's not real you know - it's real in the sample context, sure, but this endless fkg comparison with real players is becoming almost obsessional.
It's an ongoing developement, this business with samples and as time goes by, R&D in this field will make things even better as time goes on.
Best
PR
@DG said:
It looks as if I'm going to have to refrain from posting if nobody is interested in hearing my views [:(]
DG
@PaulR said:
Actually Daryl, I requested your company in the Dynamics thread earlier today, but you may have missed it. This is because of just what we're talking about here and your conducting expertise.
Of course I and everyone is interested in what you say. It's extremely interesting -it's just sometimes a softer approach - and before you say 'hark who's talking' -I would agree! [:D]