@Robert Kral said:
But putting a price on even just one legato instrument....VERY tricky!!!
I wouldn't think so. herb states the VIP price is based off of the number of new samples from first edition. Granted this is probably a divisional number based off of the estimated samples instead of the actual sample count. It wouldn't be too hard to take the total number of samples of the cube and divide the price by those samples to get XXX (do the same for the performance set), take the total number of samples in the flute and flute ensemble in the cube and PS to get YYY, and then multiply XXX by YYY. You'd get a true cost based on the number of samples in the flute. (It seems like right now herb is charging about 2 cents -- 0.01929103 -- per sample for the first edition and 1 cent per sample -- 0.01361352 -- for the pro edition on the old pricing system whereas it's just
slightly higher for the first edition { 2 cents -- 0.02122638} and pro edition { about 1 and a half cents-- 0.01442823} samples.)
Then, I'd see where it comes out at -- if it's something like 78.21 for the entire flute I'd would make it either 79.99 or 89.99. That would make sense from a business standpoint (cost of running extra discs just for the flutes, packaging, etc.) and to the consumer. If someone's really interested in the library they will save up for the whole library, but if someone really only wants one or two instruments then this is the way to go. Granted, they pay more per instrument, but that's the price you pay for that little luxury.
Or at least that's how I see it, even as a consumer. Honestly, even at how low the pricing is even if it
doubled you'd still be getting your money's worth as the price per sample beats almost anyone else I've seen. I could be wrong though.