@dpcon said:
No question as to disagreeing because I would point to Beethoven for anyone who wanted to see great horn writing. I do agree with Adler who uses LvB 6th as his second example. Kennan sighting the horn in the 5th as dramatic and arresting. Piston sighting the Pno Cto 5 saying the natural horn, with all it's limitations had a vital and lasting influence on melody and harmony. This style can be heard in Goldsmith's writing in Patton (my favorite rookie) so I don't understand any impractical or errant influence upon a student.
Well let me remind you of a famous example then. Beethoven 5th Symphony, 1st movement, Recapitulation of the 2nd subject. The Horns play the first 4 notes and the Bassoons play the next 2. Obviously, this is because the notes weren't available to the Horns for the whole phrase. Now let's transfer that to a sample rendition. OK, a good musician would naturally make the volume of the Bassoons match the Horns and thereby get an incorrect view of the relative dynamic ranges of these instruments.
My point is that unlike William (pointing a gnarled finger...!), I think that studying the imitators (poor Tchaikovsky) is often better than studying the Masters, for a view of the safest way to do things. When the knowledge of what is correct has been assimilated, then it is the time to look at how the innovators break the rules, and why it works.
DG