euphemism
n : an inoffensive expression that is substituted for one that is considered offensive;
Later tonight I will post the long list of Euphemisms that Russell Cox* has used to perpetuate his hostilities on this board towards other members and how speaking in this manner is an ego-protective mechanism for looking at real things metaphorically so that you can think of them differently or on a different level than they really are. It is often done in patients who have a dissassociative disorder with reality, such as schizophrenics. It can be from growing up in an insulated envirnoment or having been subjected to certain abuses. My own contention is that the disorder is nothing more than living in an alternate reality, which in my opinion is not wrong, nor a disorder by the clinical terms. But when communicating outside of this reailty one should try to be prepared for unexpected social recourse as a result of the schizophrenia. In other words, you can be this way and there is nothing wrong with it, but knowing you are is part of the medicine needed to surivive in the reailty that is not your own.
Since we are going to go unmoderated here (as Dietz,Dot, and CM have proclaimed), I am going to go ahead with an analysis of Russell Cox and his use of uncivilized language and psycho-speak to berate others and other's ideas, later tonight. I did not look forward to wasting my time with this, but now I do as it seems I'm the only one able to understand Russell's disfunctional methods of communication. And as well, he asked me to explain. I look forward to it. It's not often that a musician, composer can also understand such complexities as the inner mind. I intend to be completely objective and in no way say anything towards Mr. Cox that might be considered anything other than unbiased objectivety. I still like the guy even. But the things he said were not nice/civil/respectful/whatever-you-want-to-call-it, even if he, CM, Dietz, Peter0302, and Dot don't understand why. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's right.
Evan Evans
P.S. Maybe Mr. Cox could heed CM's words, and "not feed the trolls" (which by the way CM, is a euphemism).
*(I understand how to spell Russell Cox, but perhaps the keyboard did not echo my more responsive command; and perhaps a name with so many double letters has harbored extra sensitivites to an otherwise harmless mistake that often occurs with such a spelling, let alone other words)
n : an inoffensive expression that is substituted for one that is considered offensive;
Later tonight I will post the long list of Euphemisms that Russell Cox* has used to perpetuate his hostilities on this board towards other members and how speaking in this manner is an ego-protective mechanism for looking at real things metaphorically so that you can think of them differently or on a different level than they really are. It is often done in patients who have a dissassociative disorder with reality, such as schizophrenics. It can be from growing up in an insulated envirnoment or having been subjected to certain abuses. My own contention is that the disorder is nothing more than living in an alternate reality, which in my opinion is not wrong, nor a disorder by the clinical terms. But when communicating outside of this reailty one should try to be prepared for unexpected social recourse as a result of the schizophrenia. In other words, you can be this way and there is nothing wrong with it, but knowing you are is part of the medicine needed to surivive in the reailty that is not your own.
Since we are going to go unmoderated here (as Dietz,Dot, and CM have proclaimed), I am going to go ahead with an analysis of Russell Cox and his use of uncivilized language and psycho-speak to berate others and other's ideas, later tonight. I did not look forward to wasting my time with this, but now I do as it seems I'm the only one able to understand Russell's disfunctional methods of communication. And as well, he asked me to explain. I look forward to it. It's not often that a musician, composer can also understand such complexities as the inner mind. I intend to be completely objective and in no way say anything towards Mr. Cox that might be considered anything other than unbiased objectivety. I still like the guy even. But the things he said were not nice/civil/respectful/whatever-you-want-to-call-it, even if he, CM, Dietz, Peter0302, and Dot don't understand why. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's right.
Evan Evans
P.S. Maybe Mr. Cox could heed CM's words, and "not feed the trolls" (which by the way CM, is a euphemism).
*(I understand how to spell Russell Cox, but perhaps the keyboard did not echo my more responsive command; and perhaps a name with so many double letters has harbored extra sensitivites to an otherwise harmless mistake that often occurs with such a spelling, let alone other words)