Sprio,
I agree with the sentiment - the whole library should be as open as possible and to the widest range of users. And in many ways it is - but the user would have to do a considerable amount of work to create the "Instrument" from the samples. I know quite a lot of us have started that interesting and rewarding process.
Also agree that an idependent like Kontact would be ideal. HALion 1 just did not work in the Mac Logic/Performer Environment - and whilst I use Cubase SX and Neundo 1.6 for some music development these are just not my cup of tea - (forgive the fun but there is nothing logic about them) and I suspect that until they fully support Pro-Tools hardware users will continue to shun them as well.
I find that I cannot agree your statement:
....."but with VSL and EXS24...I'm afraid you are porting your library to but a small minority of the soft sampler community"........
I am sure that Herb and the team did their own research on this subject - my information is that the ESX is the most widely used softsampler in the Mac community - and IMO if the ESX were fully ported to the PC enviroment rather than the cut down ESXSP VST version is would be adopted by more users.
Leaving that issue aside - perhaps some third party might take on the task of porting (under license) the VSL Library to multiple soft samplers.
tattie
I agree with the sentiment - the whole library should be as open as possible and to the widest range of users. And in many ways it is - but the user would have to do a considerable amount of work to create the "Instrument" from the samples. I know quite a lot of us have started that interesting and rewarding process.
Also agree that an idependent like Kontact would be ideal. HALion 1 just did not work in the Mac Logic/Performer Environment - and whilst I use Cubase SX and Neundo 1.6 for some music development these are just not my cup of tea - (forgive the fun but there is nothing logic about them) and I suspect that until they fully support Pro-Tools hardware users will continue to shun them as well.
I find that I cannot agree your statement:
....."but with VSL and EXS24...I'm afraid you are porting your library to but a small minority of the soft sampler community"........
I am sure that Herb and the team did their own research on this subject - my information is that the ESX is the most widely used softsampler in the Mac community - and IMO if the ESX were fully ported to the PC enviroment rather than the cut down ESXSP VST version is would be adopted by more users.
Leaving that issue aside - perhaps some third party might take on the task of porting (under license) the VSL Library to multiple soft samplers.
tattie