I do now have the library since 3 weeks. After having installed the samples on my HD’s I did try to make some MIDI mock-ups of classical orchestral pieces, which was nice to learn and fool around with the library. But not sufficient, to have an idea about all the possibilities of VSL. So I did decide to investigate the library very systematically and every day I do consecrate 90 minutes in order to play every single patch and write down how it could be used in realizing a music production, and their qualities –or no qualities.....
Last week I did realize that this library is not as any other one I own. It is a visionary product, build not only for now but for the years to come. Of course we do have version 1.0 of VSL [;)].
I must say that, IMHO, there are many, but really many things which I would like before the so many times asked loops! Here the first and for me the most evident: Woodwind sounds are not on the standard now expected in the whole world. The oboe player was obviously not capable of using vibrato. It is even difficult to hear if this is an Viennese or a French oboe, it sounds terrible.... Sorry about this. Clarinet is somewhat better, but also not a very cultivated clarinet sound. Fagott (bassoon) sounds like a tuba. I did read about equalizing the sounds, but sorry again: First you have to have a decent recorded sound. This instruments are not on the level of the whole library!
The repetition tool does always stops going after a while, and keeps repeating the same sample. If I close the tool and reload the same configuration it will work again. I did try this on 3 different Giga Computers and it was the same. Maybe this is an already known problem, so I am sorry.
The performance tool is a genius idea but the practical realization is not optimal. IMO it should be integrated as a layer, plug-in or whatever in the sequencer. The ideal way would be a thing like ¨"Virtual Maestro Tools" from Roman Beilharz. I am not a tech guy, so I can not really do contribute, but what I know is that I hate to open the performance tool and search the rigt file every time I want to change patch.
Iwan Roth
http://www.iwanroth-sax.com
Last week I did realize that this library is not as any other one I own. It is a visionary product, build not only for now but for the years to come. Of course we do have version 1.0 of VSL [;)].
I must say that, IMHO, there are many, but really many things which I would like before the so many times asked loops! Here the first and for me the most evident: Woodwind sounds are not on the standard now expected in the whole world. The oboe player was obviously not capable of using vibrato. It is even difficult to hear if this is an Viennese or a French oboe, it sounds terrible.... Sorry about this. Clarinet is somewhat better, but also not a very cultivated clarinet sound. Fagott (bassoon) sounds like a tuba. I did read about equalizing the sounds, but sorry again: First you have to have a decent recorded sound. This instruments are not on the level of the whole library!
The repetition tool does always stops going after a while, and keeps repeating the same sample. If I close the tool and reload the same configuration it will work again. I did try this on 3 different Giga Computers and it was the same. Maybe this is an already known problem, so I am sorry.
The performance tool is a genius idea but the practical realization is not optimal. IMO it should be integrated as a layer, plug-in or whatever in the sequencer. The ideal way would be a thing like ¨"Virtual Maestro Tools" from Roman Beilharz. I am not a tech guy, so I can not really do contribute, but what I know is that I hate to open the performance tool and search the rigt file every time I want to change patch.
Iwan Roth
http://www.iwanroth-sax.com